Thank you, Madam Chair.
This is a quick question going back to the question of old age security for permanent residents and other people who have a shorter term than 40 years in the county—the residency requirement, as they say. You may be aware that there have been proposals before the House to reduce that residency requirement from ten down to, say, three years, hypothetically. What would a measure like that cost, considering that for each increment you put in play, presumably the benefit would decline also, because it's always taken as a percentage of the 40 years, isn't it? There's eligibility, but once you cross the eligibility line, then the benefit changes depending on residency.
Could you explain that?