Hi. Thank you for having me here today.
I should say that I'm presenting wearing two hats today. I'm from the Newfoundland and Labrador Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse, which is a brand new organization, and I'm also involved with the Transition House Association of Newfoundland and Labrador, which is the provincial organization for all of the provincially funded women's shelters in Newfoundland and Labrador. I want to include some data from them as well.
I want to give you a quick overview about where seniors live in Newfoundland and Labrador. We have a population of about half a million in 300 different communities. We have approximately 150,000 people in the capital area, and everywhere else is a smaller community. We have many seniors in much smaller communities, and in some cases, we're talking about 200 people. There is considerable migration of working people to the capital city, which means we have many seniors who are living in continually more isolated situations.
Newfoundland's is also an aging population, very much so. In 2006, 13.4% of the total population was aged 65 and over. By 2016, seniors aged 65 and over will represent about 20% of our population. By 2026, they'll be 27% of it. At that point, I heard recently, the populations of Newfoundland and Labrador and Japan will be the oldest populations in the world. This means, obviously, that elder abuse is a concern for us as our senior population grows.
I should say that there haven't been any recent or current studies in Newfoundland and Labrador, nor are there any centralized systems to capture elder abuse statistics, so unfortunately I don't have any hard data.
But what I am going to give you is some numbers from the Seniors Resource Centre of Newfoundland and Labrador information line. This is a non-profit organization across Newfoundland and Labrador. They have a toll-free information line that is answered by seniors. It is really there to provide information and referral for any kind of service; it's not elder abuse-specific. However, back in 1990 they noticed that they were starting to get elder abuse calls. There were just three calls back then. By 2005 they were receiving 189 elder abuse calls. By 2010 there were 87.
This is a drop, but I think that's because of public awareness and because people are being referred to different sources. The numbers might sound small, but when you think about the fact that this is not an elder abuse line and yet these calls are coming in, they are actually quite significant. A large number of the calls coming in concerned financial abuse, but there were also calls around emotional and physical abuse and neglect.
There has also been a study called “Community Health Needs and Resources Assessment in Newfoundland and Labrador”, a study on seniors' issues. This wasn't specifically around elder abuse, but there was an elder abuse question in it. They asked 821 seniors in our province whether elder abuse was a problem, and 483 or 59% said no, 26% said somewhat, while 15% said they saw it as a major problem.
Because of these calls coming into the Seniors Resource Centre, the centre developed several projects to deal with them. They developed a speakers bureau about elder abuse and an interagency elder abuse committee to discuss the issue and share information. They did a guide, Looking Beyond the Hurt: A Service Provider's Guide to Elder Abuse, to help service providers understand where to refer people affected by elder abuse.
From this, the interagency elder abuse committee became the Elder Abuse Committee of Newfoundland and Labrador. It consisted of both government and community representatives. They worked together to develop a strategic plan to address elder abuse in Newfoundland and Labrador. This strategic plan ran from 2005 into 2010, and it made recommendations around six key strategic elder abuse issues. These were: public awareness and education, elder abuse legislation, a community response to elder abuse, training and screening for service providers, caregiver support, and research.
This was presented to government. I'm afraid that it was never officially adopted, but we recently did a review of the plan and were pleased to see that about 70% of what we had recommended had actually occurred. The areas that we feel still need development are screening for service providers, specifically around the home support area, and research.
One thing we wanted to do as part of the strategic plan was develop a community response, a network to ensure that seniors experiencing abuse didn't fall through the cracks. We had a project that was funded by the national crime prevention strategy and the Public Health Agency of Canada.
We went out and talked to the community to develop our own plan. We visited 26 communities, did more than 35 consultations, and spoke to approximately 400 people. This was done throughout our province. I can tell you that in every single community we went to, we held a public meeting, and in every single meeting there was at least one person who came forward afterward and told us they were being abused. It is really an incredible problem.
We asked seniors how they wanted to be helped. The answer is probably not surprising: they said they want options in how they ask for help. Some said they felt more comfortable calling a 1-800 number so they didn't know the person at the other end of the line. Some wanted to talk to people in their community.
They said that they wanted a community-based option, especially in the smaller communities; that there has to be accountability and follow-through; and that there also needs to be a way to deal with systemic problems.
Based on what we heard, we developed a model. Just to give you an idea of some components of our model, we are: a central elder abuse resource line; a provincial office; regional elder abuse consultants; response teams—these are multi-disciplinary teams to discuss cases; senior navigators in communities, who actually are trained seniors within communities who can be there as another person for seniors to talk to if they want help; a seniors' advocate office; and basic standards of supports for abused seniors.
As we did this work, we realized that a lot was going on in our province and that we needed to become a provincial network. I'm pleased to say that on October 4 we officially became the Newfoundland and Labrador Network for the Prevention of Elder Abuse. If you want to check us out, our website is www.nlnpea.ca. We consist of both government and community partners. Our goal is to share information about what is going on and to help improve referrals in the province.
There are other initiatives going on in our province. The Seniors Resource Centre has peer advocates in more than 80 communities. These are volunteer seniors who are trained to listen and to talk to seniors. They are getting additional training on elder abuse this year. They are being trained on how to ask the questions and are also giving presentations on the issue.
Our Department of Health and Community Services had a campaign about violence against older persons in 2008. This consisted of brochures, radio ads, and posters, and I think it was very successful.
We have something called regional coordinating committees, which are regional networks of anti-violence groups. They have been doing a lot of awareness issues in the community.
The provincial government is currently developing a training program for service providers. They're dealing with health boards, police, and home support, and the first phase is due to roll out soon. We're excited about that.
I think the public awareness of the issue has come a long way, but now we need to focus on coordinating services. If people are told to reach out and ask for help, they need the services to support them.
I'm going to switch my hat a little now and talk about some information from the women's shelters.
We have 10 shelters in our province, four of which are in Labrador. Before I came here, I asked all of the executive directors what they thought about the issue of older women in their shelters and what they thought needed to be done.
Two different pictures emerged from my conversations: one of them I'm going to call the larger shelters, but when I say larger shelters, I'm probably talking about six to 10 rooms, while the second is the smaller ones in northern communities.
In the larger shelters, they said that about 20% of their clients are 50-plus, but some feel that older women are not availing themselves of the shelter service because of mobility or health issues that the shelters can't support. For instance, some of them still have bunk beds. Also, communal living was a deterrent for many older women.
They noted that almost all of their cases were domestic abuse cases: lifelong partners who have been abusing, and it has grown old. They also noted that older women seemed more likely to leave an abusive situation and they felt that this was probably because they had children who were grown and had left the house so they were ready to do something.
The smaller shelters, I have to admit, actually surprised me. One reported that 80% of their clients were over 50. They said that in their community, communal living was less of an issue because everyone knew everyone anyway, and the seniors just filled the role of grandparents in the shelters. They said that they experienced mixed sources of abuse. Some was domestic violence from lifelong partners. Some was by newer, or what they called younger, partners, who were after pensions, and some was by children.
But I think what disturbed me the most was that they said that the older women didn't use the shelters to leave abusive relationships. They were literally used as a respite from the abuse, because there was no housing in the community. There was nowhere they could go. They were not prepared to leave the community. It was just a break from the abuse.
I then asked them to make some recommendations about what could be done. They suggested--