I would just add on that point the work I did with the Association of Atlantic Universities was very early on, but we were trying to get a more consistent approach to sexual assault policies, particularly on the issue of recording, and that is partly for another big issue around universities, how much of the response has to do with making universities a safer place for women and others who are victims and how much is public relations. It's not good public relations to have high sexual assault statistics; therefore, on either count—and sometimes you do things for the wrong reasons but they're so good—they want to get a definition that is more consistent.
If a particular university seems to have a very high rate, it may in fact mean that they have a very good reporting system, because of course this is grossly under-reported. They have done the kind of training. They have people who others feel comfortable going to and reporting, so they have very high statistics. Somewhere else that has a very poor system has low statistics, and people say, “Great, we should go there; it's a safe place.” It might be just the opposite, actually.
I agree with Professor Chambers that in general, there obviously needs to be flexibility to design unique aspects of it, but I think there can be parts of it that are fairly universal. Speaking of universal, there is the other point you made that maybe these policies should always apply to the whole community, not just students. Maybe all these policies should be accessible to people who need them in a very difficult time. Maybe you need to have some reasonably standard definitions of what is sexual assault. I think there can be both. It's like federalism. There are some national standards and there's provincial diversity, and I think you could do the same thing with universities.
Very quickly while I'm here, I had another thought, which may be a really bad one, on federal jurisdiction. I think one might make an argument that the crisis of sexual assault on university campuses is a big enough one such that it's peace, order, and good government under federal jurisdiction, although I won't make any friends provincially. It seems to me that in some ways it's a very strange argument, though maybe not so strange if you actually look at the statistics about how serious this is.