Evidence of meeting #133 for Status of Women in the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was women.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Myrna Dawson  Director, Canadian Femicide Observatory for Justice and Accountability
Suzanne Zaccour  Director of Legal Affairs, National Association of Women and the Law
Heidi Rathjen  Coordinator, PolySeSouvient
Marie-Claude Richer  Director, Rebâtir
Élise Joyal-Pilon  Lawyer and Director, Rebâtir
Amy Jarrette  Deputy Commissioner for Women, Correctional Service of Canada
Kathy Neil  Deputy Commissioner, Indigenous Corrections, Correctional Service of Canada
Clerk of the Committee  Ms. Tina Miller

12:55 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Let's remember to speak through the chair.

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

I'm sorry, Chair.

While my colleague spoke highly of it here, what she posted on social media and what her colleague, a fellow MP, posted was not positive whatsoever. Also, moms can't participate if they've been convicted of an offence against a child or an offence that could reasonably be seen as endangering a child, and they're not subject to a court order or other legal requirement prohibiting contact with the child.

I think it's really important to get the actual facts out about the program and not misinformation to just generate outrage. Moms who are part of it are also required to participate in parenting skills training. It's believed that at least 25,000 children in Canada have a mom in prison, and StatsCan's most recent data, from 2011, showed that 48% of children residing in foster care are indigenous and that the majority of those kids have incarcerated moms. Overall, children of incarcerated mothers appear to be subject to more instability both before and after incarceration.

Anyway, Madam Chair, we are very supportive of doing this study. I would like to propose an amendment, however. I will keep one copy....

1 p.m.

Liberal

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

I can distribute that while you talk.

1 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

Thank you.

The motion would be amended as follows:

That the committee undertake a study of no less than three meetings on the institutional mother-child program immediately following the conclusion of the study on the rise in violence directed towards 2SLGBTQI+ and invite (i) the Minister of Public Safety, Democratic Institutions and Intergovernmental Affairs, (ii) the Commissioner of Correctional Services Canada

—and then we've added the following witnesses—

(iii) Emilie Coyle, executive director, Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies (iv) Senator Kim Pate, (v) Dr. Ivan Zinger, correctional investigator, (vi) Dr. Ben Roebuck, ombudsperson for the victims of crime, (vii) Benjamin Perrin, author, (viii) Emily O'Brien, founder, Comeback Snacks, (ix) Marlene Orr, chief executive officer, Native Counselling Services of Alberta, (x) Sandra Delaronde, Director of Giganawenimaanaanig, and that the committee reports its findings and recommendations to the House, and that pursuant to Standing Order 109, the committee request that the government table a comprehensive response to the report.

I'll move the amendment, Chair.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Would it be prudent of us to indulge both the NDP and the Bloc to include a witness as well?

1 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

We can always add more.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

We can add more.

I'll stick to your amendment.

1 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

Yes, my amendment still remains, Chair, and we could add, “and other witnesses as submitted by committee members.”

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Okay, thank you.

1 p.m.

Liberal

Pam Damoff Liberal Oakville North—Burlington, ON

This is something we've done at the public safety and the ethics committees, where we've actually listed witnesses. It doesn't preclude others from being—

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Okay, we have a motion on the table.

First, we have to deal with the amendment. Thank you.

Leah, go ahead.

Leah Gazan NDP Winnipeg Centre, MB

I'm supportive of the amendment and the proposed study. I think it's a very important study, particularly with our current study on gender-based violence, and particularly in Manitoba and the Prairies, where 85% of incarcerated persons—women—were the fastest growing population of incarcerated persons, which is much related to what we spoke about today regarding intergenerational trauma and colonization.

We talk about reconciliation, and we need to reconcile with the consequences it has had, particularly on indigenous and Black communities in this country; as the late Percy Tuesday, a residential school survivor, said, “Prisons are the new residential schools.”

I'm very supportive of the proposed study and how it would help to reunify and heal families.

Thank you.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Oh, Michelle, you were on the speaking list. I'm sorry.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Ferreri Conservative Peterborough—Kawartha, ON

Yes, you forgot me, Chair.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

I did.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Ferreri Conservative Peterborough—Kawartha, ON

Thank you.

I have no issue with this. I just want to clarify, again, that this has nothing to do with that, and to my colleague's point, I have a message here from Rodney Stafford.

It's the issue of the sex offenders and the child-killers who are sharing the same space as the program. That's never been studied. That's the issue, and I think we have to do due diligence on that.

I agree 100% with everything else. It's very important.

I ran into Terri-Lynne McClintic right outside the mother-child program. I saw it, and maybe it's an unintended consequence of the program, so I'll throw you a bone, but I think that—

1 p.m.

Liberal

Lisa Hepfner Liberal Hamilton Mountain, ON

I have a point of order. I think we're debating the motion.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Ferreri Conservative Peterborough—Kawartha, ON

I'm just responding to what Ms. Damoff said.

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Let's first speak to the amendment. Are we good with the amendment?

1 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Ferreri Conservative Peterborough—Kawartha, ON

Yes. The only question I have is about there being no less than three meetings.

From a clerk's perspective, regarding “immediately following the conclusion of the study on the rise in violence directed towards”, when is that? Is that the next study?

The Clerk of the Committee Ms. Tina Miller

Yes, that's the next study.

1 p.m.

Conservative

Michelle Ferreri Conservative Peterborough—Kawartha, ON

Is there any appetite to do this study first, just based on what is happening?

Is there any negotiation on that? Do you just want to do it after?

1 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

First, we have Sonia, and then we will go to Andréanne.

Sonia Sidhu Liberal Brampton South, ON

Thank you, Madam Chair.

Madam Chair, I support my colleague's amendment to the motion. The witnesses she's proposing for the panel have extensive expertise on human rights. We need to hear from them to get a complete picture of the institutional mother-child program.

It's also essential that we go ahead with the study we are doing on violence against the 2SLGBTQ+ community first, because violence against that community is also on the rise.

However, I'm very supportive of the amendment because the data is crucial. We need to see the picture and to see what is there.

Thank you.

1:05 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Shelby Kramp-Neuman

Go ahead, Andréanne.