All right.
I wanted to bring you back to this touch, see, hear, and look, because that is essentially the nuts and bolts of regulatory oversight. If one shifts from one system that we currently have to another one that's done by someone else and where you see paper, that seems to be where we're having a difficulty. How can you be so sure that the delegation of regulatory oversight, since Canada is at the forefront of this according to you, is not a mistake? How can you be so sure of that?
You may be right, but I want to know what makes you sufficiently satisfied that you assert that indeed delegation.... But you put some qualifiers on it. In the time I have left, I'd like you to explore that, because those are some of the concerns we have. You know as well that when this was presented to us, it was said that the SMS will be “in addition to”. Since then we've heard—and we'll hopefully wrap that up at the end—testimony saying that this is not quite the case, because we're delegating it.
You're right. That is the nub; that's where we are. So your comments in terms of that evolution, as you call it, would be useful.