Mr. Chair, our motion has to do with the fact that the chairperson of the National Capital Commission should be bilingual. Under the NCC's current structure, it now has a chairperson and not a chief executive officer, as it did before.
Nevertheless, the fact remains that the chairperson, namely the person carrying out that function, must be comfortable in both French and English. The person must be bilingual at the time of the appointment for the simple reason that, in the national capital region, be it in Quebec or Ontario, in Gatineau, Chelsea, La Pêche—I may be forgetting a town—or Ottawa, there are francophones. The chairperson must attend general meetings or even larger public gatherings. For instance, at one point, an event was held at the Casino Lac-Leamy in Gatineau. When the current chairperson, Mr. Mills, was appointed by the current Minister of Foreign Affairs and the minister responsible for the National Capital Commission, Lawrence Cannon—who was the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities at the time—he read introductory remarks in French. Actually, it was not when he was appointed, but rather when I attended the general meeting. When he was appointed, Mr. Cannon said that Mr. Mills would learn French, that there would be no problem.
He will go to Chicoutimi to learn French.
Mr. Chair, when I attended that meeting, he was not able to answer any of my questions in French. That happened in at least two meetings. There was another meeting that took place at Place de la Chaudière, on the Hull-Aylmer side. He could not respond in French at that meeting either, or at the most recent one.
If the government considered it important to have a bilingual person in the job, a person who was not bilingual should not have been chosen. There are other people who are bilingual who could have been chosen, people who could have done the job, if only out of respect for francophones in Gatineau and Ottawa. They are entitled to have a chairperson of the National Capital Commission—an important part of the federal government—who will represent them adequately in their own language.
We miss Mr. Beaudry a lot in this respect. When he was asked a question in English, he would answer in English, and when he was asked a question in French, he would answer in French.
With that in mind, we need to ensure—and this is the purpose of the amendment—that the chairperson of the National Capital Commission, the person who sits on the board of directors of this crown corporation, can speak and understand French, in the same way that they can speak and understand English. That is our rationale, Mr. Chair.