Our understanding is that the level of insurance that are being talked about, in the order of the billion dollars you referenced, would be sufficient coverage for the nature of the incidents that could potentially arise as a result of the care and attention being taken to manage the safe transportation of crude oil or other dangerous goods. The exposure to that level of liability coverage would seem unlikely because I believe, apart from Lac-Mégantic, which was a very unfortunate and unique situation, there haven't been situations arise prior that have tested or gone beyond the liability coverage arrangements.
On April 10th, 2014. See this statement in context.