I'll try to speak quickly because I'm going to get cut off.
I'm glad to hear we're all learning the best practices in the five countries you mentioned. I believe I heard you say, in answer to one of my colleagues' questions, that you feel we're ahead of the curve, or we're right up in the top group on how we're providing services to our veterans. I appreciate that, but I want to go back to what was mentioned by one other colleague about the remote sites, the rural areas.
My riding is in northern Ontario. I appreciate that he said “if” we could have a family doctor; we don't have family doctors in these areas. We're losing them as we speak. We're down to fewer than 25% of what we need for our community, let alone the challenges of a veteran who would move into that area, even the new veterans. We do have one, and I keep saying it around here and nobody ever listens, but I appreciate the huge problem that it is. In every community we already have an active organization that looks after veterans and is an anchor for many of them, and that is the Legion. No matter how we talk about it, we can't find a way to support them. They are the only institutions in these communities that have any ability to deal with some of the veterans.
I don't know the answer. I don't know who is going to have to think out of the box at some point to realize that to help our veterans and make sure there is some kind of anchor in a community, we must make sure the legions are still there. I don't know at what point we will think outside the box. We realize we can't support all service groups, but how do we make sure there is some recognition, some facility--not facility, that's not the correct word--something in a community that doesn't have doctors, that doesn't have many veterans?