That's a very good question.
It goes back to not having an instrument to actually have some lessons learned from the process. There are no mechanisms in place. There haven't been, to date, mechanisms in place that review the decisions all the way down and back to adjudication, tracing back the cases that were returned from the Federal Court all the way through the tribunal, then the departmental review including the initial adjudication.
If that was the case, there's the likelihood that within that process, or that mechanism, some things would have been considered critical at the adjudication process that may not be considered critical now. That's what we said before. In some cases, it's worth the time and effort to ensure that the evidence available is presented at adjudication rather than adding it later on to a review or appeal process.