House of Commons Hansard #122 of the 36th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was animal.
The House resumed consideration of Bill C-14, an act respecting an agreement with the Norway House Cree Nation for the settlement of matters arising from the flooding of land, and respecting the establishment of certain reserves in the province of Manitoba, as reported (without amendment) from the committee.
Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation ActGovernment Orders
The Speaker
The House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the report stage of Bill C-14. The question is on Motion No. 1. A vote on this motion also applies to Motion No. 2.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, I think you would find unanimous consent for the members who voted on the previous motion to be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberals voting nay.
Manitoba Claim Settlements Implementation ActGovernment Orders
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
John Reynolds Reform West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members vote yes.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, the members of the Bloc Quebecois are in favour of this motion, of course.
Yvon Godin NDP Acadie—Bathurst, NB
Mr. Speaker, the NDP members present are voting yes to this motion and I would like to add the member for Churchill.
Norman E. Doyle Progressive Conservative St. John's East, NL
Mr. Speaker, the Progressive Conservative members vote no to this motion.
John Nunziata Independent York South—Weston, ON
Mr. Speaker, on behalf of the residents of York South—Weston, I vote yes to the motion.
André Harvey Liberal Chicoutimi, QC
Mr. Speaker, I vote nay on this motion.
Jake Hoeppner Reform Portage—Lisgar, MB
Mr. Speaker, Portage—Lisgar votes yes.
Réjean Lefebvre Bloc Champlain, QC
Mr. Speaker, I will be voting in favour of this motion.
(The House divided on Motion No. 1, which was negatived on the following division:)
Division No. 1391Government Orders
The Speaker
I declare Motion No. 1 lost. I therefore declare Motion No. 2 lost.
The next question is on Motion No. 3.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree I would propose that you seek unanimous consent to apply the results of the vote on Motion No. 1 to the motion now before the House.
Division No. 1391Government Orders
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
Division No. 1391Government Orders
Some hon. members
Agreed.
(The House divided on Motion No. 3, which was negatived on the following division:)
Bob Nault LiberalMinister of Indian Affairs and Northern Development
moved that the bill, as amended, be concurred in.
Bob Kilger Liberal Stormont—Dundas, ON
Mr. Speaker, if the House would agree, I would propose that you seek unanimous consent that members who voted on the previous motion be recorded as having voted on the motion now before the House, with Liberal members voting yea.
Division No. 1392Government Orders
The Speaker
Is there agreement to proceed in such a fashion?
John Reynolds Reform West Vancouver—Sunshine Coast, BC
Mr. Speaker, Canadian Alliance members present vote yes and I would mention that the hon. member for Skeena has left.
Stéphane Bergeron Bloc Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, Bloc Quebecois members will be voting against the motion.