House of Commons Hansard #88 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was energy.

Topics

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Peter Schiefke Liberal Vaudreuil—Soulanges, QC

Mr. Speaker, that is a wonderful question. I thank him for providing me with an opportunity to conclude my remarks in responding to that question.

Canadians understand that the implications of inaction far outweigh the implications of action. That holds true for current and future generations of Canadians. We owe it to them to be sure, and to all of those who came before us and made the hard choices that were necessary to build a strong Canada that we can all be proud of.

For these reasons, and more, I wholeheartedly support the ratification of the Paris agreement, and I encourage all hon. members of the House to support it as well.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Conservative

Alupa Clarke Conservative Beauport—Limoilou, QC

Mr. Speaker, I commend my colleague from Vaudreuil—Soulanges on his speech. I have a question for him.

I think my colleague is well aware that many Canadian municipalities, especially in rural areas, sadly have no public transit to speak of. Nonetheless, countless workers have to put gas in their cars to get to work.

What does his government intend to do for the workers who will be unable to afford rising gas prices resulting from the carbon tax? What does his government intend to do to help these people get to work?

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:25 p.m.

Liberal

Peter Schiefke Liberal Vaudreuil—Soulanges, QC

Mr. Speaker, I thank the hon. member for the question.

First, our government is making record investments in public transit, including through our budget 2016-17. This will give many cities such as Montreal, Toronto, and Vancouver the opportunity to develop public transit systems that are accessible to people currently without access.

Second, through our budget, we are going to invest in science and technology to promote the manufacture of electric vehicles so that people have a less expensive way to get to work.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Anthony Rota

It being 5:30 p.m., pursuant to order made Tuesday, October 4, 2016, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of Motion No. 8 under government business.

The question is on the subamendment. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the subamendment?

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Anthony Rota

All those in favour of the subamendment will please say yea.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Anthony Rota

All those opposed will please say nay.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

5:30 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Anthony Rota

In my opinion the nays have it.

And five or more members having risen:

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the amendment to the amendment, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #117

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

The Speaker Geoff Regan

I declare the amendment to the amendment lost.

The next question is on the amendment. The question is as follows. Shall I dispense?

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

An hon. member

No.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

The Speaker Geoff Regan

[Chair read text of amendment to House]

Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the amendment?

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

No.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

The Speaker Geoff Regan

All those in favour of the amendment will please say yea.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Yea.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

The Speaker Geoff Regan

All those opposed will please say nay.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

Some hon. members

Nay.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:10 p.m.

The Speaker Geoff Regan

In my opinion the nays have it.

And five or more members having risen:

(The House divided on the amendment, which was negatived on the following division:)

Vote #118

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:20 p.m.

The Speaker Geoff Regan

I declare the amendment lost

The next question is on the main motion. Is it the pleasure of the House to adopt the motion?

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

6:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed

No.

Paris AgreementGovernment Orders

October 5th, 2016 / 6:25 p.m.

The Speaker Geoff Regan

All those in favour of the motion will please say yea.