Oh, oh!
House of Commons Hansard #167 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was opposition.
House of Commons Hansard #167 of the 42nd Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was opposition.
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan
The hon. member for Edmonton West is having trouble restraining himself. I would ask him and others to remember that they are not allowed to interrupt. I know he seems to be blaming his colleague next to him from Calgary Signal Hill. He would not want to be blaming somebody else for that, of course. The hon. government House leader still has the floor, and I know that he and others all want to hear her finish her answer.
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Liberal
Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON
Mr. Speaker, the discussion paper that was offered to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs to broaden the scope of this study was exactly that, to hear ideas and really bring this place into the 21st century. During the election campaign, we made commitments to Canadians. We are committed to delivering on those commitments. We will ensure that we modernize this place.
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Conservative
Luc Berthold Conservative Mégantic—L'Érable, QC
Mr. Speaker, this Liberal government is demonstrating an arrogance that has never before been seen in this House.
For the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons, discussing means imposing. Discussing means crushing the opposition. In order to show that the Liberals are all-powerful and allow the Prime Minister to show up in the House only once a week, she is once again proposing to unilaterally impose new rules.
Is it because she herself no longer has any confidence in her own government that the leader wants to change rules that should not be changed without the unanimous consent of all members of the House?
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Waterloo Ontario
Liberal
Bardish Chagger LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister of Small Business and Tourism
Mr. Speaker, during the election, we promised to bring real change to Parliament, and our objective has always been to make Parliament more effective, open, and transparent.
We made specific commitments regarding the use of prorogation, the inappropriate use of omnibus bills, the strengthening of committees, the improvement of financial oversight, and greater accountability during question period. We are going to implement the promises that we made to Canadians. I encourage all members to take part in the conversation—
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Conservative
Blake Richards Conservative Banff—Airdrie, AB
Mr. Speaker, the Liberals say they wanted to have a supposed discussion on the Standing Orders, but it turns out that it was just a Trojan Horse for what they really wanted, for the Prime Minister to only have to show up once a week. Now they are trying to ram through changes to the House that they could make without amending the Standing Orders. Even the Liberal member for Malpeque said, “I strongly believe that you have to have at least consensus from the main parties to change the rules of the House.”
If the Prime Minister will not listen to common sense on this side of the House, will he at least listen to reason from one of his own Liberal MPs?
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Waterloo Ontario
Liberal
Bardish Chagger LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister of Small Business and Tourism
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to rise in the House and correct the record, because when it comes to the ideas that we have shared with Canadians, when it comes to a prime minister's question period, that day would be in addition to the other days that the Prime Minister is in the House. This would hold the government to greater account. It would allow not just leaders of the opposition, but for private members to ask the Prime Minister questions directly. We have shown that this can work. It is not just about holding this government to account, it is about holding future governments to account. Let us be more open and more transparent, just like we committed to Canadians.
Democratic ReformOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Liberal
Ruby Sahota Liberal Brampton North, ON
Mr. Speaker, Canadians deserve to know how political parties are funded. The Minister of Democratic Institutions is leading our government's efforts to bring a new level of openness and transparency to political fundraising. Could the Minister of Democratic Institutions update the House on the efforts to shed light on political funding?
Democratic ReformOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Burlington Ontario
Liberal
Karina Gould LiberalMinister of Democratic Institutions
Mr. Speaker, Canadians deserve more open and transparent information about political fundraising. We will be bringing forward legislation to give Canadians information about fundraisers involving cabinet ministers, party leaders, and leadership contestants. Canadians will know about the events in advance, where they are being held, the cost to attend, and they will know who attended them.
I note that the Liberal Party of Canada chose on its own to bring in open, transparent fundraising rules. I encourage all parties to be open and transparent when it comes to political fundraisers.
Forestry IndustryOral Questions
2:50 p.m.
Conservative
Todd Doherty Conservative Cariboo—Prince George, BC
Mr. Speaker, last week was a dark week for the over one million Canadians who are supported by Canada's forestry industry. The minister said that the U.S. trade action did not come as a surprise and that job losses are to be expected. Stories of work curtailment and mill closures are being heard right across our country. One small mill owner in my riding today is writing a cheque in the millions. He is not sure how much longer he can keep the doors open.
The minister did not have answers last week, so I am asking the Prime Minister. Will he stand today and tell the hard-working forestry families what his plan is now that they are facing uncertain times?
Forestry IndustryOral Questions
May 1st, 2017 / 2:50 p.m.
Winnipeg South Centre Manitoba
Liberal
Jim Carr LiberalMinister of Natural Resources
Mr. Speaker, our government disagrees strongly with the punitive measures that were taken by the American government last week, and we understand that our first responsibility is to protect the workers and the producers and the communities that will be affected. We are having conversations with our provincial counterparts from every region of this country, to make sure that all governments work together to ensure that those who need protection will get it from us and our provincial counterparts.
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
NDP
Thomas Mulcair NDP Outremont, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister is today in this House breaching parliamentary tradition by refusing to answer questions. Stephen Harper took all questions every day during the Senate scandal. The Prime Minister wants to change the fundamental rules of Parliament in order to help himself. Why all of this? Well, because he says he values question period and accountability. That is why he wants to scrap it.
If that is true, why does he not stand and start asking Canadians to listen to answers to some of our questions for once, instead of his usual platitudes or non-answers?
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Waterloo Ontario
Liberal
Bardish Chagger LiberalLeader of the Government in the House of Commons and Minister of Small Business and Tourism
Mr. Speaker, during the campaign, we committed to—
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Some hon. members
Oh, oh!
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan
Order. The hon. government House leader has the floor. One at a time.
Standing Orders of the House of CommonsOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
Bardish Chagger Liberal Waterloo, ON
Mr. Speaker, during the election campaign, we committed to bringing real change to the way that this government will govern. This government committed to Canadians to listen and to engage them in the very real challenges they are facing. We will continue to do that. What is clear is that this place needs modernization. We can improve the way that we work together in the House of Commons. We know that is exactly what Canadians expect. I encourage all members to be part of that conversation and to really bring this place into the 21st century.
Social DevelopmentOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Liberal
Yves Robillard Liberal Marc-Aurèle-Fortin, QC
Mr. Speaker, the Government of Canada committed to developing a Canadian poverty reduction strategy. A consultation process was launched in February to give people the opportunity to discuss key poverty-related issues online and in person. My colleagues from Laval and I will be holding a public consultation to hear what our constituents have to say.
Would the Minister of Families, Children and Social Development tell us what the deadline is for holding consultations?
Social DevelopmentOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Québec Québec
Liberal
Jean-Yves Duclos LiberalMinister of Families
Mr. Speaker, I thank the member for Marc-Aurèle-Fortin for the leadership he has shown in his community and for his work with the Standing Committee on Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities.
National consultations will inform our country's first-ever poverty reduction strategy and help us build a fairer and more inclusive society. I encourage all members to contribute to creating our first poverty reduction strategy by holding consultations between now and June 30 so we can give all Canadians a real and fair chance to achieve their potential.
Softwood LumberOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Conservative
Bernard Généreux Conservative Montmagny—L'Islet—Kamouraska—Rivière-du-Loup, QC
Mr. Speaker, the U.S. government just announced new tariffs to the tune of 20% on Canadian softwood lumber imports. The Prime Minister promised on March 10, 2016, that a new agreement would replace the one reached by the Harper government and that it would be concluded within 100 days. It has now been more than 400 days.
The Liberals still do not have an agreement, jeopardizing the 370,000 direct and indirect jobs in Canada's forestry sector.
Why is the government waiting and why did it wait to do something about this?
Softwood LumberOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
University—Rosedale Ontario
Liberal
Chrystia Freeland LiberalMinister of Foreign Affairs
Mr. Speaker, it was the former Conservative government that allowed the agreement to expire. We are now dealing with the fifth softwood lumber dispute. Our workers and producers have never been found guilty. We strongly oppose the decision by the U.S. Department of Commerce to impose an unfair and punitive tax. The charges are unfounded. We will continue to raise this issue with the United States. I want to point out that we want a good agreement for Canada, not just any agreement.
Foreign InvestmentOral Questions
2:55 p.m.
Bloc
Xavier Barsalou-Duval Bloc Pierre-Boucher—Les Patriotes—Verchères, QC
Mr. Speaker, yes, we will have to agree to wait.
I wanted to ask the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development if he planned to evaluate the sale of Canam to American Industrial Partners, but I already got my answer. In fact, he will not be able to evaluate it, because the government changed the law.
Basically, because the Liberals were sick of being harassed about the sale of leading Quebec companies, they decided to change the law, so there is no longer any problem; it is settled.
Now we are stuck with the Canadian government's laissez-faire economic policies, which are dangerous for our economy.
How many more flagship companies do we have to lose before the minister will admit that he made a big mistake by increasing the threshold—
Foreign InvestmentOral Questions
3 p.m.
Liberal
The Speaker Liberal Geoff Regan
Order.
The hon. Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development.
Foreign InvestmentOral Questions
3 p.m.
LaSalle—Émard—Verdun Québec
Liberal
David Lametti LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Innovation
Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague for his question.
We are obviously aware of the situation involving Canam, and we are watching it closely. What I can say is that we are creating a positive environment for investment and economic growth in Quebec and across Canada, in order to create good jobs. We will continue to do everything we can to improve the Canadian economy.
Softwood LumberOral Questions
3 p.m.
Bloc
Marilène Gill Bloc Manicouagan, QC
Amidst all this talk of growth and improvement, Mr. Speaker, we are dealing with yet another softwood lumber crisis, the fifth in 35 years.
This is going to be really devastating for Quebec, our regions, our families, and our communities. Forestry workers know that they cannot count on the 40 Liberal MPs from Quebec, who have said nothing. How many sawmills will have to close their doors before the government wakes up?
For the fifth time, is Ottawa going to abandon Quebec's forestry sector, or will it at the very least provide loan guarantees to help it get through this crisis?