House of Commons Hansard #112 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was children.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Criminal Code First reading of Bill S-224. The bill amends the Criminal Code to simplify the definition of exploitation for human trafficking offences, removing the requirement for survivors to prove an element of fear in their abuse. 100 words.

Citizenship and Immigration Members debate a motion condemning Russia's invasion of Ukraine and calling for Canada to develop measures to support Russian dissidents, human rights defenders, and conscientious objectors fleeing Russia. Discussions highlight Canada's provision of weapons and energy security for Europe. Some Liberals express disappointment with the debate's timing, alleging it delays environmental legislation. The NDP and some Conservatives condemn comments by Alberta's Premier on Ukraine, while the Bloc calls for meaningful diplomatic dialogue. The importance of supporting figures like Vladimir Kara-Murza is emphasized. 24100 words, 3 hours.

Petitions

Strengthening Environmental Protection for a Healthier Canada Act Second reading of Bill S-5. The bill [^/debates/2022/10/18/monique-pauze-1/] strengthens the Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), which has not been updated since 1999, to better protect the environment and human health from toxins and improve air and water quality. While the bill introduces a [^/debates/2022/10/18/richard-cannings-4/] "right to a healthy environment" in its preamble, members debate whether this offers true enforceability or is merely a "pseudo-right" [^/debates/2022/10/18/monique-pauze-6/]. The Bloc Québécois and NDP support the bill at second reading, hoping for substantial amendments in committee to strengthen this right and other provisions. 5200 words, 30 minutes.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives heavily criticize the government's role in the rising cost of living, citing inflationary taxes and a housing bubble. They repeatedly call to cancel plans to triple the carbon tax, which impacts home heating, gas, and groceries. They also condemn tax increases and past funding scandals.
The Liberals emphasize their commitment to helping low-income families with dental care and rental assistance, along with the GST credit and climate action incentives. They defend their efforts to fight climate change and invest in a green economy. The party also addresses border security contracts, support for Ukraine, and measures against anti-Semitism.
The Bloc demands transparency on Roxham Road contracts, questioning "national security" as a pretext. They criticize the new policy to fast-track energy projects and oil exploration without environmental assessments. They also highlight the government's delayed response to the Ottawa convoy.
The NDP demands a recession plan and expanded EI coverage for all. They advocate for bold climate action and an industrial strategy for clean energy jobs, particularly for Alberta workers, and question Roxham Road contracts.

Motion That Debate Be Not Further Adjourned Members debate the Liberal government's motion to end debate on Bill C-31, which proposes dental care for children and rental support. Liberals and NDP urge swift passage to committee, citing the urgency for benefits. Conservatives and Bloc Québécois decry the use of closure, questioning the bill's design, cost, provincial jurisdiction, and the government's delivery capacity. 4400 words, 35 minutes.

Government Business No. 20—Proceedings on Bill C-31 Members debate a programming motion for Bill C-31, which aims to provide cost-of-living relief through dental care for children and a one-time rent subsidy. Liberals argue the motion is necessary to expedite support for vulnerable Canadians, while Conservatives criticize it as undemocratic and contributing to inflation. The Bloc Québécois raises concerns about provincial jurisdiction, while the NDP emphasizes the bill's importance in filling dental care gaps. 8500 words, 1 hour.

National Ribbon Skirt Day Act Second reading of Bill S-219. The bill seeks to establish January 4 as a National Ribbon Skirt Day to celebrate Indigenous women, girls, and two-spirited people. Members across parties support the bill, recognizing ribbon skirts as symbols of strength, identity, and resilience. Some members, like the NDP, suggest amendments to include all Indigenous cultural practices. Conservatives stress the need to address the Indian Act's discriminatory aspects and ensure Indigenous women's voices are heard in reconciliation efforts. 7900 words, 1 hour.

Government Business No. 20—Proceedings on Bill C‑31 Members debate Bill C-31, proposing a Canada dental benefit for children under 12 and a $500 housing top-up for renters. Liberals support it as crucial for affordability. Conservatives argue it's an admission of failure on inflation, criticizing federal spending and lack of provincial consultation. The Bloc questions federal jurisdiction, advocating for health transfers. The NDP welcomes the dental plan, pushing for broader affordable housing solutions. 9500 words, 2 hours.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 2 Second reading of Bill C-31. The bill proposes a dental benefit for children under 12 and a one-time $500 rental housing benefit to address cost of living. Liberals and NDP support it as a necessary first step, citing current gaps in care and the need to help vulnerable Canadians. Conservatives argue it is a "costly coalition" spending scheme that duplicates provincial programs, urging for health transfers instead. The Bloc Québécois supports the goals but claims the bill infringes on provincial jurisdiction and lacks consultation. 24600 words, 3 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Natural ResourcesOral Questions

2:40 p.m.

North Vancouver B.C.

Liberal

Jonathan Wilkinson LiberalMinister of Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, let me just say that a fact is a fact. The projects that he is talking about were assessed under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012, in which Stephen Harper took out all of the environmental protections. One of the big reasons why these projects did not proceed is because they completely gutted the environmental assessment process.

We have put in place better rules to ensure that good projects are going to get built in this country, and we are certainly moving in that direction.

TaxationOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB

Mr. Speaker, the winter months are coming across the country and Canadians are hesitating to turn on the heat. Why? Because they are already paying more for gas. They are already paying more for groceries, Now, thanks to the Prime Minister, they are paying more for home heating, in fact, in some cases, 300% more.

Will the Prime Minister cancel his plans to triple the taxes on gas, groceries and home heating?

TaxationOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Laurier—Sainte-Marie Québec

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault LiberalMinister of Environment and Climate Change

Mr. Speaker, it is interesting that those members would talk about energy poverty, because when they were in power, the first thing they did was cut energy efficiency projects for the lowest-income Canadians. Hundreds of people were laid off. That is the first thing they did when they came into power in 2006.

Then what did the Conservatives do? They eliminated subsidies to help Canadians buy electric vehicles. Then what did they do? They limited support for renewable energy projects. If there is energy poverty in the country, it is because the Conservative Party was in power for 10 years.

TaxationOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

Some of the comments have not been very parliamentary. I want to remind hon. members about that.

The hon. member for Edmonton Riverbend has the floor.

TaxationOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

Matt Jeneroux Conservative Edmonton Riverbend, AB

Mr. Speaker, under the Prime Minister, people cannot afford to heat, eat and live. Does he not realize almost half of Canadians are $200 away from insolvency? A recent report now indicates that families spend more on income taxes, at 43%, than they do on basic commodities, at 35.7%. That means that the young couple that emailed me from my riding, James and Debbie, cannot afford to put their little girl into skating.

Will the Prime Minister cancel his plans to “just in” increase their taxes?

TaxationOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

University—Rosedale Ontario

Liberal

Chrystia Freeland LiberalDeputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance

Mr. Speaker, we understand Canadians are struggling with the cost of living. That is why we have a plan to double the GST tax credit. I am really glad all members of the House, including the members opposite, are supporting that plan and Canadian families will be getting nearly $500 in inflation relief soon.

Now it is time to get together and support the rental payments and support dental care for kids under 12. By the way, I wish the members opposite would support, for Edmonton families, our great day care plan, which is lowering the day care cost for that family by 50% this year.

Climate ChangeOral Questions

October 18th, 2022 / 2:45 p.m.

NDP

Laurel Collins NDP Victoria, BC

Mr. Speaker, Canadians want bold climate action and workers want to know they will have well-paying jobs for the future, but the Liberals have failed to deliver. Instead, they are giving billions of dollars to rich oil and gas companies, while workers and communities struggle.

Unions, environmental organizations and workers have been calling for a clear path forward, an industrial strategy and investments in good, clean jobs. The global economy is already moving toward a clean energy future, and Canada is failing to keep up.

My question is simple. Why is the Liberal government leaving Canadian workers behind?

Climate ChangeOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

North Vancouver B.C.

Liberal

Jonathan Wilkinson LiberalMinister of Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, certainly, I agree with the hon. member that we do need to have a proactive economic strategy that ensures Canada seizes the opportunities that will be created through a low-carbon transition. That is why we brought forward a critical minerals strategy, a hydrogen strategy. That is why we are working on regional energy and resource tables with most of the provinces and territories, and eventually all of them.

Certainly, those are the conversations the hon. member and I have been having, as we have actually talked about a number of these issues. I certainly look forward to continuing that work going forward.

Climate ChangeOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

NDP

Charlie Angus NDP Timmins—James Bay, ON

Mr. Speaker, Alberta workers have delivered a very clear message to Ottawa today that the energy transition is happening and they need the Prime Minister to show up. We see that Biden is transforming the American economy with well-paying union jobs, yet the Prime Minister has missed every climate target he has set. Clean energy represents a $61-billion opportunity in Alberta.

We know the Alberta Conservatives would throw workers under the bus just out of ideological spite, but my question is for the Prime Minister. Is he willing to work with the Alberta Federation of Labour on establishing its plan for a clean energy transformation?

Climate ChangeOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Saint-Maurice—Champlain Québec

Liberal

François-Philippe Champagne LiberalMinister of Innovation

Mr. Speaker, we have been working with labour across the country. In fact, we are going to be the first country in the world to be producing green steel, green aluminum, and we are working on green batteries.

We do not need to look back very much. Just look at the announcement we made with Rio Tinto recently. While it is going to be reducing its emissions, the site itself will be the largest site in the world to be producing titanium to be on the global market. Just recently, we broke ground on the Dofasco plant in Hamilton.

We are going to be producing green steel that is going to be part of the car of the future. The country is on the way to win at every step of the way.

National DefenceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Liberal

Julie Dzerowicz Liberal Davenport, ON

Mr. Speaker, as the world grows darker, we are stronger together. Last week, the Minister of National Defence participated in a meeting of NATO defence ministers and visited Poland to address key challenges to our collective security, including increasing our support for our Ukrainian partners.

Could the minister tell the House how Canada continues to step up and support NATO, as well as the brave Ukrainian military fighting back against Putin’s brutal and reprehensible attacks?

National DefenceOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Oakville Ontario

Liberal

Anita Anand LiberalMinister of National Defence

Mr. Speaker, last week, in Poland, I signed a memorandum of understanding, strengthening the defence relationship with Poland, and committed 40 Canadian Armed Forces engineers to help train Ukrainians. Then at NATO, I announced another tranche of military aid for Ukraine, including cameras for drones, satellite services, 155 millimetre ammunition and additional aid.

We will stand shoulder to shoulder with Ukraine in the short and long term.

Public Services and ProcurementOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the Liberal members of the Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics worked very hard to convince us that Mr. Guay, who received $28 million for his land in Lacolle, had never met with any MPs from their party to talk about those contracts.

However, we know that Mr. Guay attended at least four cocktail party fundraisers for the Liberal member for Châteauguay—Lacolle.

Will the Prime Minister admit that, contrary to the testimony in committee, the member met with Pierre Guay on several occasions?

Public Services and ProcurementOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Markham—Stouffville Ontario

Liberal

Helena Jaczek LiberalMinister of Public Services and Procurement

Mr. Speaker, as the Prime Minister said, the rental agreement was negotiated based on fair market value to arrive at a competitive price.

In their testimony yesterday, the public servants and Mr. Guay made it clear that Mr. Guay was approached by public servants to negotiate a lease and that no public office holder was involved in the negotiations for this lease.

Public Services and ProcurementOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Pierre Paul-Hus Conservative Charlesbourg—Haute-Saint-Charles, QC

Mr. Speaker, what is clear is that Mr. Guay was paid $28 million for contracts awarded without tenders.

In committee, the Liberals did everything they could to suggest there was never any contact with elected members. However, Mr. Guay is known to have attended at least four cocktail party fundraisers with the Liberal member for Châteauguay—Lacolle.

Is there a conflict of interest, yes or no? Could land have been leased from someone who is not a Liberal donor?

Public Services and ProcurementOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Markham—Stouffville Ontario

Liberal

Helena Jaczek LiberalMinister of Public Services and Procurement

Mr. Speaker, again, the contract award has been clearly revealed by our department. The government has been delivering open and fair procurement processes, while obtaining the best value for Canadians in all that our government is contracting in terms of the needs during the Roxham Road situation.

Diversity and InclusionOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

Mr. Speaker, for over a month, the Prime Minister's Office knew the public rantings of a known anti-Semite and then continued to fund him until he was caught. This is not incompetence, it is purposeful and condones the very real and growing anti-Semitism.

The Prime Minister, the Minister of Canadian Heritage and the Minister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion knew. They knew for a month and they did nothing. It is hard to imagine a month of silence of hate-fuelled bigotry against any other group in our country.

Who else knew and why is no one on the other side being held accountable for promoting hate with Canadian tax dollars?

Diversity and InclusionOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

York South—Weston Ontario

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen LiberalMinister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion

Mr. Speaker, this is a very important question. Anti-Semitism, hate and racism have no place in our society. I have said this before and I will say again that the anti-Semitic, violent, racist statements made by this individual and the organization are reprehensible and vile. The funding to this organization has been cut.

Our government will never tolerate this hate, and we are implementing new measures to make this never happens again.

Diversity and InclusionOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Melissa Lantsman Conservative Thornhill, ON

Mr. Speaker, it took two days to cut funding to Hockey Canada and it took one week to cut funding to the WE scandal.

The Liberals condemn it now because they got caught, because the media asked them, because they could not hide it any more. It took a month to do and say nothing about a racist anti-racism consultant they knew spewed public hatred. They continued to fund him for a month.

Who is getting fired for this?

Diversity and InclusionOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

York South—Weston Ontario

Liberal

Ahmed Hussen LiberalMinister of Housing and Diversity and Inclusion

Mr. Speaker, there is absolutely no doubt that the comments made by this individual and this organization are absolutely appalling. We condemn the anti-Semitism, racism and hatred that he has spread over a number of years.

I want to thank my colleague, the member of Parliament for Mount Royal, for bringing this individual to our attention. When this issue was raised, we immediately asked the department to confirm the project funding details and inform us about the procedural next steps. After the review, we followed the process in place, cut the funding to this organization and demanded the money back.

Public SafetyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Bloc

Rhéal Fortin Bloc Rivière-du-Nord, QC

Mr. Speaker, nearly nine months ago, convoys of transport trucks were heading to Ottawa, announcing their plans to lay siege to the city.

We learned yesterday that hotel operators knew they were coming. They warned the City of Ottawa that, in the middle of the pandemic, 15,000 people were trying to book every hotel room in the city for three months. Ultimately, only the federal government did not see the siege coming.

When the government says that it was in constant communication with the City of Ottawa before the trucks arrived, what were they talking about, if not this? Were they exchanging recipes?

Public SafetyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Eglinton—Lawrence Ontario

Liberal

Marco Mendicino LiberalMinister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, we invoked the Emergencies Act because it was an unprecedented situation. Witnesses testifying at the commission have demonstrated that people's lives were disrupted, including families and young people who needed cancer treatments and care for other very serious illnesses.

In an effort to manage the situation, we first sent RCMP officers to help the City of Ottawa, and now we are going to work with the judge to learn from the experience.

Public SafetyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Bloc

Rhéal Fortin Bloc Rivière-du-Nord, QC

Mr. Speaker, the problem is that they did not manage the crisis. The total lack of leadership on the part of this government is telling. That is what the mayor of Ottawa, Jim Watson, showed the commission today.

He personally spoke with the Prime Minister on January 31, day three of the crisis, to ask for police reinforcements. He then spoke with the Minister of Public Safety on February 3. It took three more weeks for Ottawa to take action, three weeks. If the situation was so urgent that the Emergencies Act needed to be invoked, then why did it take three weeks to deploy police officers? It is urgent, but there is no rush?

Public SafetyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Eglinton—Lawrence Ontario

Liberal

Marco Mendicino LiberalMinister of Public Safety

Mr. Speaker, with all due respect for my colleague, the timeline is very clear.

From day one of the illegal blockade, we managed the situation by providing the resources, the RCMP officers and all the tools that the police needed. Now we are going to co-operate with the commission to learn from the experience. It is a very serious situation.

We invoked the Emergencies Act because it was necessary, and it worked very well on the ground.

TaxationOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Ted Falk Conservative Provencher, MB

Mr. Speaker, last year, the average family spent 36% of their income on basic necessities like food, shelter and clothing. Do members know what percentage was spent on taxes? It was 43%. That is over $40,000 per household, and the Prime Minister is planning on tripling the carbon tax, further penalizing families when they purchase their basic necessities. The Prime Minister is also planning a payroll tax increase on January 1.

Will he recant and offer some relief to struggling Canadian families?