House of Commons Hansard #166 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was women.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives relentlessly questioned the Prime Minister about alleged Chinese foreign interference in Canadian elections. They demanded transparency regarding his knowledge of funds from Beijing to candidates and parties, warnings about candidates in interference networks, and the lack of action against diplomats and police stations. They called for an independent inquiry and for his chief of staff to testify.
The Liberals address concerns about foreign interference, denying federal candidates received money from China. They advocate for an independent special rapporteur to examine mechanisms and restore confidence, while defending existing oversight bodies like NSICOP. On International Women's Day, they highlight efforts against gender-based violence and commitment to $10-a-day childcare and abortion access.
The Bloc criticizes the Prime Minister's refusal to establish an independent public commission of inquiry into foreign interference in Canadian elections. They reject his solutions of a secret committee and a special rapporteur, asserting that existing measures did not work and that the integrity of democracy is at stake.
The NDP demand a public inquiry into foreign interference to restore electoral confidence. They also advocate for Indigenous women and girls through a red dress alert, call for inclusion of trans women in the hate combat plan, and urge support for the Official Languages Act.

Resignation of Member Members pay tribute to Marc Garneau, the Liberal MP for Notre-Dame-de-Grâce—Westmount, upon his resignation after 14 years. Speakers from various parties praise his distinguished career as an MP, minister, and the first Canadian astronaut. They commend his dedication to public service, his respectful demeanor, and his challenge to members to act with dignity in the House. 4000 words, 40 minutes.

National Strategy on Flood and Drought Forecasting Act First reading of Bill C-317. The bill establishes a national strategy for flood and drought forecasting. It aims to use advanced technology to create accurate prediction systems, addressing environmental damage and financial losses across Canada in cooperation with stakeholders. 100 words.

Employment Insurance Act First reading of Bill C-318. The bill amends the Employment Insurance Act and Canada Labour Code to provide a new 15-week EI period for adoptive and intended parents. It aims for greater parity in parental benefits and acknowledges unique attachment needs for adoptive families. 200 words.

Old Age Security Act First reading of Bill C-319. The bill seeks to improve seniors' financial health by extending the 10% Old Age Security increase to all seniors at age 65 and raising the Guaranteed Income Supplement eligibility threshold for working seniors. 100 words.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act First reading of Bill C-320. The bill amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to provide crime victims with timely and accurate information about offenders' sentences and parole eligibility, aiming for transparency and a stronger voice for victims. 300 words.

Petitions

Online Streaming Act Members debate a motion regarding Bill C-11, An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act. The government proposes to accept 18 of 26 Senate amendments, while respectfully disagreeing with eight others, primarily to avoid interpretative issues, maintain the CRTC's regulatory flexibility, and keep the bill's focus on including online undertakings in the broadcasting system. Conservatives argue the bill would stifle digital creators and censor online content. 8800 words, 1 hour.

Pandemic Day Act Second reading of Bill S-209. The bill proposes establishing March 11 as "Pandemic Observance Day" to commemorate the impact of COVID-19. Members discuss remembering victims, honouring frontline workers, and learning from the pandemic for future preparedness. While broadly supported, some members criticize the government's handling of the pandemic response, citing incompetence and corruption. 5500 words, 45 minutes.

Adjournment Debates

Mental health funding parity Gord Johns criticizes the government for failing to achieve parity between mental and physical health funding, citing a constituent's struggle to afford addiction treatment for his son. Élisabeth Brière defends the government's investments in mental health services through bilateral agreements with provinces and territories, and online support portals.
Seniors and rising food costs Mel Arnold accuses the government of failing seniors amidst rising inflation and food costs. Mark Gerretsen defends the government's record, citing increased OAS pension, restored GIS/OAS eligibility age, and CPP enhancements. Arnold dismisses one-time payments as insufficient, while Gerretsen insists he gave a thorough answer.
Impact of the Carbon Tax Kyle Seeback argues the carbon tax is failing to reduce emissions and hurting families, citing increased food bank use and financial instability. Élisabeth Brière defends government actions, highlighting reduced child care costs, increased employment, and inflation relief measures, arguing that the carbon tax provides rebates to families.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

SeniorsAdjournment Proceedings

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Mel Arnold Conservative North Okanagan—Shuswap, BC

Madam Speaker, again we have a non-answer from the Liberal government. The Liberals claim to be helping. One-time payments will be swallowed up with half a month's rent because rent has gone up to $2,000 in 10 of our major cities. Grocery costs are rising 10%, and I do not believe that is an accurate number. I just spoke about a case of cauliflower for a restaurant going from $35 to $40 to $140 per case. Those one-time payments the parliamentary secretary talks about are going nowhere, and they are not helping seniors. The government continues to fail.

SeniorsAdjournment Proceedings

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Madam Speaker, I will admit that, from time to time, I rise in the House and some of the words that come out of my mouth might not be to their satisfaction in answering the question asked by a member opposite. However, I would encourage this member to review my answer because I gave a very thorough one.

These are not one-time payments. We restored the age of eligibility for GIS and OAS from 67 to 65. We enhanced the Canada pension plan. We reduced income taxes. Yes, during the pandemic there was a one-time payment, but we did so many other things. For him to cherry-pick that one data point and not listen to my complete answer is very telling of where the Conservatives are on this issue.

Carbon PricingAdjournment Proceedings

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Madam Speaker, the carbon tax is an absolute failure. We have to measure it by two metrics, and the first metric is whether it reduced carbon emissions. On that metric, it is absolutely clear it is a failure, because carbon emissions have gone up under the Liberal government every single year. That is strike one.

The next thing is whether it is supposed to give more money back to Canadian families. The PBO report is unequivocal on this. When we factor in the cost of the carbon tax to the Canadian economy, most Canadian families actually end up behind on the carbon tax. If we factor in things like the cost of the carbon tax on farm families, we have an absolute and unmitigated disaster.

The carbon tax is a complete failure, and the Liberal government's plan is to increase it. It is not stopping climate change, it is not reducing emissions and it is financially hurting Canadians, and the government's decision is to increase it. Why is that relevant? I will give three statistics.

In my hometown of Orangeville, the number of seniors using the Orangeville Food Bank is up 415% since the government took over. That is the number of seniors who say, after eight years of the Liberal government, they cannot afford to feed themselves and now have to go to the food bank to help themselves out.

Twenty-five per cent of Canadian families are saying that if they get a $500 expense, they cannot pay it. Think about that. That is one-quarter of Canadian families. What is going to happen? The carbon tax is going to go up, and it is going to make things even worse.

Forty-five per cent of Canadian families are within $200 of not making ends meet. This is after eight years of a Liberal government. This is the wonderful world the Liberals have created.

They are going to say they have put in place programs, and they are going to list them off. They will say, “We did this to OAS. We did this to GIS. We did this; we did that.” Well, despite all that, the trail toward poverty for Canadians continues, so everything the Liberals are doing is not working.

What will make this worse is increasing the carbon tax yet again. What does that mean? It means farmers will pay a higher carbon tax. It means food coming from farms will cost more. The tractor that ploughs the field will have a carbon tax. The truck that picks up the food from the farm to take it to the processing centre will have a carbon tax. Taking the food from the processing centre to the grocery store will have a carbon tax. Heating the grocery store will have a carbon tax.

The multiplier effect of the increase to the carbon tax is going to make things even worse for Canadian families. What the Liberals are doing is not working. Their programs are not stopping Canadians from not being able to make ends meet. Will the Liberals finally see the light? Will they finally say they are going to cut the carbon tax so Canadians can pay their bills?

Carbon PricingAdjournment Proceedings

7:25 p.m.

Sherbrooke Québec

Liberal

Élisabeth Brière LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Mental Health and Addictions and Associate Minister of Health

Madam Speaker, allow me to show my colleague that our actions are working and helping Canadians. First, since it is International Women's Day, I want to recognize the achievements of Canadian women and reaffirm our government's commitment to eliminating systemic barriers so as to advance gender equality in Canada and around the world.

Our government is taking meaningful action to support women, and we can see the results. Our Canada-wide early learning and child care system is a good example. It is already delivering $10-a-day child care in nearly half of Canadian provinces and territories and has reduced fees by at least 50% in all other jurisdictions, with work on track to reaching $10 a day across the country in just three years. In addition, last year, labour force participation for working-age women in Canada reached a record high of 85%. This is something we can all be proud of.

That said, we understand that high inflation, a global phenomenon, is hurting Canadian families. Many Canadians are struggling to make ends meet. They have to make choices at the grocery store. They are struggling to pay rent or fill up their car.

Fortunately, inflation is gradually decreasing, and the OECD predicts that it will return to its target level by the end of 2024. Inflation in Canada, which was 8.1% in June 2022, is now only 5.9%. Although this rate is still high, it is lower than what we see in many comparable economies. For example, inflation is 8.6% in the eurozone and 10.1% in the U.K.

There is also some good economic news. For example, more Canadians than ever are working. With 150,000 new jobs created in January, our 5% unemployment rate is now close to historical lows. There are 800,000 more Canadians working today than before COVID hit. That is 126% of COVID-19 job losses recovered, compared to 112% in the U.S.

Canada had the strongest economic growth, since the fourth quarter of 2021, in the G7.

However, we understand that many Canadian families, including seniors, still need help to make ends meet. To make life more affordable for millions of Canadians, we budgeted up to $12.1 billion for new inflation relief measures, many of which will continue in 2023.

For example, our government moved forward with a permanent 10% increase to old age security for seniors 75 and over, which increased benefits for more than three million seniors and provides more than $800 in the first year to full pensioners.

We also provided a $500 payment to low-income renters who are struggling with the cost of housing.

Now that we have doubled the GST credit, a family of four that is struggling to pay its bills will receive up to $1,401.

Furthermore, benefits like the Canada child benefit, the GST credit, the Canada pension plan, old age security and the guaranteed income supplement are indexed to inflation.

I also want to talk about the price on pollution. Pollution is having an unprecedented impact on Canadians across the country, and something must be done about it. It is an economic necessity. Our pollution pricing system is driving the development of new technologies and services. We see it every day in this country.

I would like to remind my colleague that our pollution pricing system is putting money back in the pockets of Canadian households and provinces where the federal fuel charge applies.

In 2022-23, through climate action incentive payments, a family of four will receive $745 in—

Carbon PricingAdjournment Proceedings

7:30 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

The hon. member for Dufferin—Caledon.

Carbon PricingAdjournment Proceedings

7:30 p.m.

Conservative

Kyle Seeback Conservative Dufferin—Caledon, ON

Madam Speaker, I am sure that, with regard to the 415% increase in seniors using the food bank, those folks are going to be very happy to hear about the Liberal child care program.

Speaking of that program, most Canadian families cannot access it because there are just not that many spaces.

As for the other programs she has talked about, I said that those have already been announced and yet 25% of Canadian families are unable to meet a $500 expense and 45% of Canadians are $200 away from not being able to make ends meet, despite all of these programs.

When will they get it through their heads? It is not working. The programs are not actually stopping any of this.

What is actually causing it is the carbon tax, which is running up the price of everything. Cut the carbon tax and groceries will be affordable, heating one's home will be affordable and people will actually be able to make ends meet.

Do not talk about a program that has actually done nothing.

Carbon PricingAdjournment Proceedings

7:30 p.m.

Liberal

Élisabeth Brière Liberal Sherbrooke, QC

Madam Speaker, we are putting money back into Canadians' pockets with the price on pollution. We are getting women back into the workforce with $10 child care. This helps them make ends meet. We are also putting money back into Canadians' pockets with increases to the various benefits that I mentioned.

As we gear up for the 2023 budget, Canadians can rest assured that our government will continue to position Canada for success while ensuring that the most vulnerable receive the support they need, keeping our finances on a sustainable long-term path and protecting our environment.

Carbon PricingAdjournment Proceedings

7:30 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker Carol Hughes

The motion that the House do now adjourn is deemed to have been adopted. Accordingly, the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 10 a.m., pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 7:33 p.m.)