House of Commons Hansard #348 of the 44th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was documents.

persons with disabilitiesdocumentsbenefitliberaldisability tax creditscandalgreen slush fundcost of livingauditor generalconflict of interestpovertyliberals200 a monthcharter of rightsrcmpcommonsconservativeplaceprivilegesinformationsdtcprivilegeconservativescommunityclawbackselectionseniorsdoneamountcorruptiondebateincomeliftndpknowpointleaderhandneedsformerinsidersgettingindividualsfix

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Human Resources, Skills and Social Development and the Status of Persons with Disabilities Members debate the adequacy and implementation of the Canada disability benefit. The NDP moves to concur with a committee report calling for the benefit to be sufficient to lift recipients out of poverty, accessible, and protected from clawbacks. They criticize the Liberal government's $200/month benefit as inadequate and a broken promise. Liberals defend it as a significant first step and the first national program. Conservatives supported the bill but argue the Liberals lacked clarity [/debates/2024/10/3/tracy-gray-1/] and rejected anti-clawback amendments. The Bloc also expresses disappointment with the amount and consultation. [/debates/2024/10/3/andreanne-larouche-1/] 25200 words, 3 hours.

Petitions

Reference to Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Members debate the government's refusal to hand over documents regarding the Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC), or "green slush fund," to the RCMP despite a House order. The Speaker ruled this refusal is a prima facie breach of parliamentary privilege, halting other House business. Conservatives allege corruption and cover-up, citing conflicts of interest and past scandals. Liberals defend their stance, raising concerns about Charter rights and judicial independence and accusing Conservatives of hypocrisy and political obstruction. 27100 words, 3 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives accuse the government of corruption, particularly regarding the SDTC green fund scandal where insiders funnelled $400 million, and for refusing to hand over documents to the RCMP. They highlight declining living standards, claiming Canada is now poorer than Alabama, criticize the bail system, and demand an election.
The Liberals highlight progress on the Canadian dental care plan, support for Canadians with disabilities, and students. They defend their record on housing and environmental protection, and their support for supply management. They accuse Conservatives of attacking charter rights and lacking viable solutions.
The Bloc demands a royal recommendation for Bill C-319 to increase Old Age Security for seniors aged 65-74 and end age discrimination. They also criticize Liberal-appointed senators for obstructing Bill C-282 that protects supply management.
The NDP criticizes the housing crisis and delays in marine safety regulations. They call for an adequate Canada disability benefit, protection against residential school denialism, and action against corporate greed to lower costs for families.
The Green Party raises concerns about poisoned drugs and the need for harm reduction funding. They also address the use of unparliamentary language regarding individuals out on bail, emphasizing the importance of respect and not jumping to conclusions.

Adjournment Debates

Homelessness and capital gains tax Tracy Gray criticizes the NDP-Liberal government for failing to address homelessness, citing rising numbers of unsheltered individuals. She links homelessness to housing affordability, blaming the government's policies. Jaime Battiste defends the government's plan to increase the capital gains inclusion rate, arguing it will create a fairer tax system and generate revenue for housing initiatives.
Wildfires and forest management Dan Mazier questions the environment minister about Parks Canada officials considering political optics over proper forest management regarding prescribed burns before the Jasper wildfires. Jaime Battiste defends the government's climate policies, emphasizing carbon pricing as essential and blaming climate change for the wildfires' devastation.
Carbon tax and climate change Marc Dalton criticizes the carbon tax, alleging it enriches Liberal insiders and increases costs for Canadians. Jaime Battiste defends the carbon tax as essential for fighting climate change and accuses the Conservatives of serving big polluters. Dalton blames Liberal policies for wildfires. Battiste insists climate crisis is real.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Government AccountabilityAdjournment Proceedings

6:50 p.m.

Sydney—Victoria Nova Scotia

Liberal

Jaime Battiste LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations

Madam Speaker, the Conservative member opposite said one thing that I will totally agree with. He said we do not know the facts. I have never heard anything more true coming from that side of the aisle.

As Canadians face ever-increasing droughts, wildfires and extreme weather events, the need to continue taking action on climate change has never been greater. Climate impacts have already reduced Canada's GDP by $25 billion. By 2055, without significant emissions reductions, these costs are projected to soar to between $80 billion and $103 billion. Who knows what kind of future we are leaving to our children?

Addressing climate change now is essential, not just for our environment, but for our economy and for our future. This summer, Canadians, including the member opposite, watched in horror as many parts of Canada were ravaged by wildfires. Canadians are looking to government to put forward concrete action to combat the effects of climate change. That is exactly what pollution pricing does.

As the member opposite knows, there is no federal price on pollution in the province of British Columbia. However, the Conservative Party is obviously not interested in what the government has to say. Maybe its members will listen when the Bank of Canada says that a price on pollution contributes less than 1% yearly to inflation rates. The reality is that the Conservative Party has no plan when it comes to fighting climate change.

With the new revelations that the senior Conservative advisers are confirming they would let the industrial polluters off the hook, combined with the report that the Leader of the Opposition met with dozens of oil and gas CEOs at a private fundraiser, the Conservatives' motives are very clear. This was never about helping Canadians. It was always about the efforts to serve their ultrarich, big polluter friends, especially those in the oil and gas industry.

The Conservatives' position on carbon pricing is clearly designed to create political cover for them trying to help their leader's friends in big oil and gas and other heavy industries to pollute for free, while ending the Canada carbon rebate and leaving Canadians on the hook to pay for the costs of that pollution.

We know the cost of doing nothing far outweighs the cost of our actions. Our government is stepping up to protect the environment so future generations will have an environment that is livable. It is a shame that other parties will not do the same.

As spoken

Government AccountabilityAdjournment Proceedings

6:50 p.m.

Conservative

Marc Dalton Conservative Pitt Meadows—Maple Ridge, BC

Madam Speaker, the member talked about fires. We have heard a controlled burn was recommended in Jasper. There was political push-back within the Liberals saying maybe they do not want to do that. Why? It is because it goes against a narrative of climate change. In fact, wildfires cause about one-third of carbon emissions in the world.

When we tax the trucker who brings in the food, when we tax the farmer who grows the food, and when we tax the grocer who sells the food, it is the consumer who pays for it. The Liberals are totally out of touch.

As spoken

Government AccountabilityAdjournment Proceedings

6:50 p.m.

Liberal

Jaime Battiste Liberal Sydney—Victoria, NS

Madam Speaker, the Conservatives are always looking for scapegoats to blame for wildfires or anything else. They are looking at bureaucrats. Shame on them. They know that the climate crisis is real. Scientists, for 20 years, have said that this is the truth. Most Canadians understand this and most Canadians are asking us to do more.

If we do not invest in climate solutions now, including carbon pricing, we will all face higher costs in the future. We have seen fires in Jasper, hurricanes in my ride in Cape Breton, snowfalls and tremendous weather events. The Conservatives always want to point the finger at something besides what they have known for 20 years, which is that the climate crisis is real and we have to act.

I really hope that, at some point, the Conservatives will stop putting political points above the future generations of Canadians.

As spoken

Government AccountabilityAdjournment Proceedings

6:50 p.m.

The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès) Alexandra Mendes

The motion that the House do now adjourn is deemed to have been adopted. Accordingly, the House stands adjourned until tomorrow at 10 a.m. pursuant to Standing Order 24(1).

(The House adjourned at 6:55 p.m.)

As spoken