House of Commons Hansard #55 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was c-14.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Criminal Code First reading of Bill S-228. The bill amends the Criminal Code to explicitly make forced or coerced sterilization without consent an aggravated assault, aiming to protect women, Indigenous women, and marginalized individuals in Canada. 200 words.

Extortion in Canada Pierre Poilievre requests an emergency debate on an "extortion crisis" across Canada, which he blames on Liberal border and justice policies. He proposes mandatory jail time, stronger borders, and clear self-defence laws. 600 words.

Bail and Sentencing Reform Act Second reading of Bill C-14. The bill [xnP89S] amends the Criminal Code, Youth Criminal Justice Act, and National Defence Act to tighten bail and sentencing rules. The government [X4TNeM] aims to strengthen public safety by expanding reverse onus provisions, adding aggravating factors for crimes against first responders, essential infrastructure, and retail theft, and restricting house arrest for serious sexual offenses. The Bloc [D0LKIk] supports sending it to committee but raises concerns about judicial discretion and the presumption of innocence. Conservatives [urGYcO] argue the bill is a "band-aid solution" that fails to repeal "soft-on-crime" policies [0kM28G] and restore mandatory minimums, attributing rising crime rates to past Liberal legislation. 49000 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's costly budget and reckless credit card spending, with the Parliamentary Budget Officer and Fitch Ratings warning of deterioration. They highlight increasing tariffs on Canadian goods after the Prime Minister's trips, declining housing starts, and rising food costs due to the industrial carbon tax. Concerns about surging extortion rates and bureaucratic luxury spending are also raised.
The Liberals defend their generational budget, emphasizing investments in infrastructure, housing, and defence. They highlight Canada's strongest G7 fiscal position and efforts to boost trade and create youth jobs. They also address extortion with legislative measures and support healthcare and cultural initiatives.
The Bloc criticizes the government's inaction on TVA layoffs, lamenting the abandonment of private broadcasters and Quebec culture. They also condemn the lack of support for the forestry sector, citing Arbec layoffs despite calls for wage subsidies.
The NDP presses the government on funding for universal pharmacare and demands a search and rescue base in Nunavut.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Members debate a question of privilege regarding the government's delayed response to the Parliamentary Budget Officer's request for information on proposed savings, with the government citing process and employee relations for the delay. 700 words.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act Second reading of Bill C-221. The bill amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to require that victims of crime receive not only eligibility and review dates for offenders' temporary absences, releases, or parole, but also an explanation of how these dates were determined. This aims to increase transparency and support victims, who often feel unheard or uninformed by the justice system. The bill builds on previous legislation that received unanimous support. 7200 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Rising Food Prices Warren Steinley argues that carbon taxes and packaging taxes drive up food prices, causing an affordability crisis. Wade Grant denies these claims, attributing higher prices to global forces and defending environmental policies as beneficial, not detrimental, to the economy. Steinley cites Sylvain Charlebois's disagreement with Grant.
Fuel tax and affordability Cheryl Gallant criticizes the Liberal government's fuel tax and spending policies, accusing them of corporate welfare and harming affordability for Canadians. Wade Grant defends the government's climate action policies, arguing that they are essential for economic security and a clean energy future.
Fentanyl and meth legality Dan Mazier asks if the Liberals believe smoking fentanyl and meth should be legal. Maggie Chi avoids a direct answer, stating provinces decide on safe consumption sites and the federal government supports communities through targeted investments and enforcement. Mazier repeats his question, but Chi again declines to answer directly.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Fraser Tolmie Conservative Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, SK

Mr. Speaker, I could never defend what the Liberals are standing for. I am appalled that they actually think this would be a good law.

I am asked questions about what the Liberals thinks. I do not get into their heads, but what I hear from my local police force is that police are tired of bringing in front of a judge someone who committed a crime, and then having them released within hours. It is appalling. In addition, people are afraid to come forward, because they know that criminals who were just arrested will come back and come after them.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:50 a.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, it is hard to believe the type of comments we are getting from the Conservative Party. Even though there are all forms of support for the legislation, the Conservative Party is determined to prevent the legislation from moving forward.

Let us be very clear to people who have been following the debate that the Conservatives, even though they talk about bail reform, are taking no action to support bail reform, because they want to use it as a political, partisan issue.

Will the Conservatives put party politics to the side, do what is in the best interest of Canadians, and allow the legislation to pass through?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Fraser Tolmie Conservative Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, SK

Mr. Speaker, victims do not care about partisan politics; they care about their public safety.

Why do you not put your partisan politics away and allow for changes so the victims can be protected instead of the criminals?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:50 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

The member used “you”. The Deputy Speaker did put his partisan affiliations aside.

Questions and comments, the hon. member for Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:50 a.m.

Conservative

Doug Shipley Conservative Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, ON

Mr. Speaker, the question is for my great colleague from the beautiful town of Moose Jaw, which I had the pleasure of visiting this past summer, and I met with some of the police, the law enforcement officers there. The member was unavailable to meet me as he was out of town when I got there.

There has been a huge rise in crime in Barrie, my city. In fact, one police officer in our town was stabbed by a gentleman who had been arrested and released on bail 17 times in two years. Are you hearing the same things in your area?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:50 a.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

I will just remind the member for Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte that he cannot use “you” referring to the Speaker. I was not there, so I actually do not know.

I invite the member for Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan to respond.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Fraser Tolmie Conservative Moose Jaw—Lake Centre—Lanigan, SK

Mr. Speaker, I am sorry that I was not in Moose Jaw at the time. I was stuck in traffic jam on Highway 400 just south of Barrie.

I am hearing the same things in my community, about people repeatedly being caught and released. What happens is that the people who are caught and released start ramping up their crimes; the severity gets worse.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

11:55 a.m.

Conservative

Kelly DeRidder Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, nine years of the Liberal government has turned Canada into a country where mothers kiss their children goodbye in the morning and pray they come home at night. Last month, Savannah Kulla, a 29-year-old mother of four, was shot dead in broad daylight in a Brampton strip mall. Her killer was a man who had already been charged with firearms offences and intimate partner violence, a man the Liberal justice system let walk free on bail.

This summer, Bailey McCourt stood in a courtroom and begged a judge to keep her violent ex-husband behind bars. He had already choked her unconscious. The judge released him anyway on $500 bail. Hours later, James Plover hunted her down and murdered her. Bailey's last words to the court had been that he would kill her. The Liberal system said that it would take a chance.

These were two women, and there were two killers who never should have been on our streets. That is the human cost of Liberal catch-and-release.

Since 2015, violent crime is up 55%, gun crime is up 130%, extortion is up 330%, sexual assault is up 76% and homicide is up 29%. This is not random; it is the direct, predictable and preventable result of the Liberals' Bill C-75 and Bill C-5. Bill C-75 codified the toxic principle of restraint, a directive that forces police and judges to release accused persons at the earliest possible moment and under the least onerous conditions, no matter how dangerous they are. Bill C-5 gutted mandatory minimums and handed out house arrest for serious sexual assault, robbery, firearms trafficking and kidnapping.

For four long years, Conservatives have stood in the House and demanded one thing: jail not bail, repealing the principle of restraint and restoring mandatory minimums and presumed detention for repeat violent offenders. All the while, the members opposite blocked us, voted against us and mocked us.

Now, after heartbreaking murders, with families having paid the ultimate price, the Liberals finally copy us with Bill C-14 and call it sweeping reform. This is surgical PR, a patchwork of press releases and photo ops that nibble at the edges while the revolving door keeps spinning.

Let us be crystal clear about what Bill C-14 would not do. It would not repeal the principle of restraint. It keeps the very words that created catch-and-release; it merely adds a redundant sentence saying that restraint would not require release. That sentence is already in the Criminal Code twice, in sections 498 and 501. The bill is not reform but press release footnotes. It would expand reverse onus for some offences: violent car theft, home invasion, choking assaults and extortion. That is good, but reverse onus would still be just a procedural speed bump. The accused could still talk their way out.

What Canadians need is a brick wall. They need presumptive detention for every serious violent offence and every repeat offender.

The bill would add aggravating factors and a few consecutive sentences, but only in narrow combinations. Break and enter would count only if it is paired with gang-related auto theft, and only on the sentence offence. Extortion would run consecutive to arson only from the exact same event. Meanwhile, mass murderers like Alexandre Bissonnette would still get to stack parole eligibility because the government will not touch the Supreme Court's rulings.

The bill would ban house arrest for major sexual assault under two years. That sounds tough, until we remember that the Liberals were the ones who made house arrest possible, in Bill C-5. They fixed one hole that they punched in the boat, while robbery, firearms trafficking, kidnapping and chronic violent offenders would still get to serve their time in their living room.

The bill would do nothing to restore the mandatory minimums the Liberals repealed. Sentencing would remain a judicial lottery: uneven, uncertain and unsafe. It would add no new judges, no new courtrooms and no funding to clear the backlogs.

We see 50% of charges in the Waterloo region dropped because the system is clogged. Waterloo Regional Police told us personally that one in five people on Liberal release orders is caught breaching conditions. More than half of those breachers are repeat violent offenders caught multiple times on the same toothless conditions, and because of the Liberal backlog, half of the charges those officers lay never see a courtroom. In one in five breaches, half the charges are dropped. This is not justice. This is a subscription service for crime.

Just last month in Richmond Hill, a 53-year-old predator allegedly groomed a child online, arranged a meeting at Lake Wilcox and sexually assaulted them. Bill C-14 would do nothing for that child. There would be no reverse onus, and house arrest would still be on the table if the sentence is under two years. That is playing Russian roulette with our children's lives.

Bill C-14 is a half measure dressed up as a victory. Canadians deserve the full Conservative plan, the real jail not bail plan we have been fighting for since day one.

Here is what real reform looks like. We should repeal the Liberal principle of restraint and replace it with a public safety clause. Public and community safety should be the governing principle in every bail decision. We should presume detention, not just reverse the onus, for every major violent offence, such as the use of firearms, sexual assault, kidnapping, human trafficking, home invasion, robbery, extortion with a firearm and arson, and for every repeat violent offender. We should restore mandatory minimums for those exact crimes, the ones the Liberals repealed with Bill C-5. We should end house arrest for robbery, firearms offences, trafficking and chronic violent offenders, with no more living room sentences. We should mandate judges to consider the full criminal record, every conviction, every breach and every outstanding charge, and lower the risk threshold from “substantial likelihood” to “reasonably foreseeable”. We should bar anyone with an indictable conviction from acting as a surety, with no more criminals vouching for criminals, and require non-residents to surrender their passports. We should also fund courts, hire judges and clear backlogs so officers' work is not wasted and victims see justice.

This is what police chiefs from coast to coast are begging for. This is what victims' families are pleading for. This is what Savannah Kulla and Bailey McCourt deserved but never got.

We will move amendments to make Bill C-14 live up to its promises. We will fight to turn Liberal redundancy into Conservative reality. However, if the government refuses, if it clings to its failed ideology, then Bill C-14 will fail the only test that matters: keeping Canadians safe tonight, tomorrow night and every night after.

Canadians have had enough of Liberal clarifications and half measures. They want Conservative convictions. It is past time to jail, not give bail, and keep our streets safe.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

Noon

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, I noticed the member indicated that the Conservatives are going to move amendments. They have changes they want to make to the legislation.

Surely to goodness members realize that that is what we do at the committee stage. Members have to allow the legislation to get through second reading. The Conservatives say they want to make changes, so they should allow it to go to committee.

Why will the Conservatives not allow, at the very least, the legislation to go to committee today so they can see if they have majority support for their amendments? After all, the Liberals are in the minority, even at committee. Why will the Conservatives not allow the legislation to go to committee today?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

November 18th, 2025 / 12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly DeRidder Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, we are continually being told that we are attacking, that we are not being non-partisan with these issues and that we are not working with the government to pass bills on these issues, but the truth is that it is the other way around. We believe in democracy, and we believe the public needs to know what is in this legislation and what the Conservatives are doing to protect them and to make sure these criminals end up in jail.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:05 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Simard Bloc Jonquière, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have been listening carefully to my Conservative colleagues' speeches today, and what I am hearing is actually quite surprising. I get the feeling that, rather than wanting to move this legislation forward, the Conservatives are trying to stir up discontent among the public by giving examples that, although deserving of discussion, should not be overblown. I do not know what their objective is here.

This morning, the Leader of the Opposition was calling for an emergency debate on a somewhat far-fetched issue by saying that the Liberals are now responsible for certain crimes in society. This is, of course, political, but I am not convinced that it is helping to advance the current debate. Perhaps my Conservative colleagues should reframe their comments if they want them to be relevant.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly DeRidder Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, it really unfortunate for the member opposite to say that these are exaggerated things happening in this country. These are real things. These are real lives being lost. These are the real consequences of what the Liberals have done to our justice system.

We are not trying to block anything. We are trying to show Canadians how we are working to protect them and make sure these criminals go to jail.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Anna Roberts Conservative King—Vaughan, ON

Mr. Speaker, it was an excellent speech. The hon. member mentioned human trafficking. Yesterday, York Region, along with Hamilton police, arrested a man for the human trafficking of children under the age of 18.

Could the hon. member please tell the people watching today that our children are our future? Canada has no future without them. Would she agree?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly DeRidder Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, first off, these things are absolutely devastating. Our children are our next generation and our children are not safe.

I have no words to say other than that these offenders should not be on our streets. They should not be victimizing our children. Our children are our legacy. We need to, as a country, keep them safe.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:05 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I have news for members of the Conservative Party. At the end of the day, there are murders. Even children are murdered. There have been all sorts of violent crimes, even when Harper was the prime minister of Canada. This is not something new. What is new is we have a Prime Minister who has made an election commitment to Canadians to have bail reform.

Will the Conservatives agree to allow bail reform to take place this year?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:05 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly DeRidder Conservative Kitchener Centre, ON

Mr. Speaker, yes, there was crime before the government came in, but since then, violent crime is up 55%, gun crime is up 130%, extortion is up 330%, sexual assault is up 76% and homicide is up 29%. We need to keep these criminals in jail.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:10 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon South, SK

Mr. Speaker, I have been looking forward to this debate all day on Bill C-14, an act to amend the Criminal Code, the Youth Criminal Justice Act and the National Defence Act.

For the last 10 years in this country, crime has been going one way, and that is straight up. In fact, even in my home province of Saskatchewan and my city of Saskatoon, in the last decade under the Liberals, there have been pathetic soft-on-crime policies, and serious crime has gone up everywhere.

I just looked at the Saskatoon Police Service website, and the crime stats are amazing. I am going to share some of them with members here today.

If we compare today's crime stats to those of 10 years ago, assaults in my city are up 35%, kidnapping and hostage-taking are up 33%, sexual violations are up a massive 66%, and stalking and break and enters with firearms are both up 300%. That is over the last 10 years.

My riding has the highest concentration of seniors in this country. In reading these numbers, I was reminded of an incident that took place in my riding of Saskatoon South this summer. I have to share it with everyone.

A 75-year-old senior woman was taking her dog for a walk, as she normally does every day in the morning. They were walking by one of the beautiful community gardens we have in the riding, and as she was walking by, she noticed someone in the garden moving around from plot to plot. The senior then asked this lady if she actually had a plot in this garden and what she was doing. She said that if the person did not have a plot, she should leave, as some had spent hours with their garden.

That was all it took for this 27-year-old to attack the 75-year-old senior walking her dog. The victim was grabbed by the hair, thrown to the ground and then attacked, believe it or not, with a gardening tool. We are grateful that this did not end as badly as it could have, but the victim lost a chunk of hair. There were no broken bones, but just think of the trauma this 75-year-old had while walking her dog and then getting into an incident with a 27-year-old.

The attacker was apprehended thanks to the Saskatoon city police a short time after. The police found her hiding in a nearby bush and took her into custody. Guess what. She was charged with aggravated assault, assaulting a peace officer, breach of undertaking and breach of probation. Police say the woman punched a female special constable in the face while she was being booked into custody. No one is surprised that she was wanted elsewhere in the province. She ended up in Saskatoon South, and because of this gardening incident, she was finally caught.

After hearing about this attack, I sent a sympathy card to this senior, and after receiving it, she showed up at my constituency office. She laid out the whole story in front of us about what happened that day: leaving her place with her dog, going through this community garden and finding this 27-year-old rummaging row by row. Then, of course, she talked about the crime that is happening in our city. Crime is, in fact, out of control after a decade of Liberal soft-on-crime policies.

These are real stories. A 75-year-old woman, who normally feels safe in my city and my constituency, was attacked for no reason whatsoever. I will give a few more examples, if I can.

Earlier this month, there was a big drug bust in my riding; it was in Stonebridge. According to the Saskatoon Police Service, on November 6, police seized over $22,000 in cash, 750 grams of fentanyl, over half a kilogram of meth, 362 grams of cocaine, multiple mobile phones and assorted paraphernalia consistent with the illegal drug industry.

During the election, I specifically remember door knocking on that block. It is unnerving to think that I most likely knocked on that door in Stonebridge, completely unaware of what was happening on the other side. I wonder how many of us in the House have been in similar circumstances in their communities, when there have been incidents reported and later convictions. Members may have kind of wondered and said, “Oh yeah, I did door knock that area.”

I wish I could tell members that was an isolated incident in my city, but the truth is I cannot. Just last year, police concluded a nine-month investigation that saw the arrests of five high-level drug dealers, three of whom were operating in my riding. The total amount of everything seized was as follows: 4.2 kilograms of cocaine, almost three kilograms of meth, $16,000 in cash, a nine-millimetre carbine rifle, a prohibited handgun, ammunition, cell phones, various other equipment, and multiple vehicles.

In May, police arrested two men in Saskatoon for more drug trafficking. They conducted search warrants in a few locations in and around the city. They again seized a number of drugs, drug paraphernalia and over $400,000 in cash.

During the summer, my colleague, the member for Barrie—Springwater—Oro-Medonte, and I met with the Saskatoon chief of police, Cam McBride. In fact, we met for over an hour. We discussed how soft-on-crime bail laws have allowed our cities to be taken over by violent repeat offenders. It was a fascinating conversation in my office.

During this meeting, Cam McBride, the city police chief, said that officers who are on the streets arrest the same people so often that the officers know them by name, saying they catch them on Monday, they are released, back on the street, and then they catch them again on Tuesday night. This is a result of disastrous catch-and-release policies and lax liberal laws, such as Bill C-5 and Bill C-75.

Earlier this year, I sent out a questionnaire to constituents asking what their views are on crime in our city. Overwhelmingly, the response was that the justice system needs to change in this country. The Liberals need to scrap their useless justice policies and adopt Conservative policies that actually are tough on crime.

I have gone to many ride-alongs in my city with paramedics and police. The first thing I noticed is that they know people by name. Repeat offenders are picked up early in the day and, unfortunately, released in the afternoon or night.

Last week in our city, the city police held a news conference to talk about a couple of issues. There are two hurdles that need to be navigated in my city for a full complement of officers to be realized: number one is recruitment and number two is the backlog. The provincial government is trying to help out. It has offered $8 million to pay for dozens of officers, but the public will unfortunately not see the impact any time soon.

The city police in my city have asked for an increase of $158 million in the city budget. That will be debated next week in Saskatoon. Every community is under pressure for new hires. It is a growing challenge, with fewer people today interested in a career of policing. That is disappointing.

I look at the RCMP in our province. We have had some major incidents, unfortunately, in our province over the last number of years. Hundreds more RCMP, if not thousands, are needed in our municipalities and cities to have the full complement of RCMP officers, which the government has promised. We are well short of that. In Saskatchewan right now, where we have the home of the RCMP Depot Division in Regina, we are short more than 100 RCMP officers in our communities.

I just wanted to say, in wrapping up, that this is an important bill. We know that there are lots of shortfalls. We look forward to further debate on Bill C-14.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

Will Greaves Liberal Victoria, BC

Mr. Speaker, everybody agrees that the government has a responsibility to continue to reduce crime in this country. We have heard from several Conservative colleagues just this morning about the high rates of crime, in particular in the province of Saskatchewan. Indeed, unfortunately Saskatchewan does have the highest crime rate of any province in Canada, according to data released by Statistics Canada earlier this year. To that end, I wonder whether the member has spoken with his colleagues in the Government of Saskatchewan, who have been in power for nearly 20 years, about what they are doing to address crime in their province.

More to the point, Conservatives are keen to talk down this country at every available opportunity. In doing so, they miss the good news. Crime is down in Saskatchewan by 5% over the previous year and nationwide by 4%. Will Conservatives help maintain that trend by supporting the government's bail and sentencing reforms?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon South, SK

Mr. Speaker, it is ironic that the member is from the city of Victoria, as there have been many encampments and lots of crime over the last number of years in Victoria. As we have noticed, many people from Saskatchewan are not travelling to the United States of America these days, for one reason or another. We would like to be hosted in B.C., but the crime in his city of Victoria is as bad as anywhere else in the country.

We are saying what the public wants to see right now, and we have been talking about this for three or four years. The Liberals have had 10 years to fix this, and now they are coming in with a band-aid approach to Bill C-75.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Bob Zimmer Conservative Prince George—Peace River—Northern Rockies, BC

Mr. Speaker, my colleague from Saskatchewan gave a great speech. I think all Canadians are asking this about this particular government: Are we confident that the same Liberals who broke our current justice system, the reason we are dealing with all this crime across Canada, are going to fix the problem? Are you confident in this government?

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

The Speaker is not going to answer that question, but the member for Saskatoon South will.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon South, SK

Mr. Speaker, no, of course we are not confident. I mean, over the last 10 years, this has been a disaster. The Liberals have finally woken up and realized that Bill C-5 and Bill C-75 were a joke. We on this side of the House have been talking about it for years.

We need tougher action on bail and release. We need to get criminals behind bars. In downtown Calgary, 75 people were charged for most of the assaults and what is going on in the city. A small number of people in Calgary are causing the biggest headache for the police service in that city.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

Bloc

Mario Simard Bloc Jonquière, QC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to issue the same warning that I gave my colleague earlier. This is a very serious matter. We must be careful not to undermine public confidence in our institutions. It seems to me that, since this morning, the Conservatives have been trying to stir up discontent among the public by saying that everything is broken, criminals are being set free and the system is not working.

It is surprising, nonetheless, that this morning the Leader of the Opposition said that we need an emergency debate on Liberal extortion, that the Liberal Party is responsible for extortion.

I am asking my Conservative colleagues to bring the discussion back—

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

I must give the member for Saskatoon South time to answer the question.

Bill C-14 Bail and Sentencing Reform ActGovernment Orders

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kevin Waugh Conservative Saskatoon South, SK

Mr. Speaker, the problem right now is being soft on crime. It is just wicked in this country.

I give credit to my leader, who went coast to coast hearing from individuals across the country about extortion, which is why we wanted the emergency debate. The incidents are happening in Calgary, in Edmonton, in Vernon, in Surrey and in Ontario. There is a 330% increase in extortion, and nobody in the House, other than our leader and our Conservative Party of Canada members, are talking about it.