House of Commons Hansard #55 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was c-14.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Criminal Code First reading of Bill S-228. The bill amends the Criminal Code to explicitly make forced or coerced sterilization without consent an aggravated assault, aiming to protect women, Indigenous women, and marginalized individuals in Canada. 200 words.

Extortion in Canada Pierre Poilievre requests an emergency debate on an "extortion crisis" across Canada, which he blames on Liberal border and justice policies. He proposes mandatory jail time, stronger borders, and clear self-defence laws. 600 words.

Bail and Sentencing Reform Act Second reading of Bill C-14. The bill [xnP89S] amends the Criminal Code, Youth Criminal Justice Act, and National Defence Act to tighten bail and sentencing rules. The government [X4TNeM] aims to strengthen public safety by expanding reverse onus provisions, adding aggravating factors for crimes against first responders, essential infrastructure, and retail theft, and restricting house arrest for serious sexual offenses. The Bloc [D0LKIk] supports sending it to committee but raises concerns about judicial discretion and the presumption of innocence. Conservatives [urGYcO] argue the bill is a "band-aid solution" that fails to repeal "soft-on-crime" policies [0kM28G] and restore mandatory minimums, attributing rising crime rates to past Liberal legislation. 49000 words, 6 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the government's costly budget and reckless credit card spending, with the Parliamentary Budget Officer and Fitch Ratings warning of deterioration. They highlight increasing tariffs on Canadian goods after the Prime Minister's trips, declining housing starts, and rising food costs due to the industrial carbon tax. Concerns about surging extortion rates and bureaucratic luxury spending are also raised.
The Liberals defend their generational budget, emphasizing investments in infrastructure, housing, and defence. They highlight Canada's strongest G7 fiscal position and efforts to boost trade and create youth jobs. They also address extortion with legislative measures and support healthcare and cultural initiatives.
The Bloc criticizes the government's inaction on TVA layoffs, lamenting the abandonment of private broadcasters and Quebec culture. They also condemn the lack of support for the forestry sector, citing Arbec layoffs despite calls for wage subsidies.
The NDP presses the government on funding for universal pharmacare and demands a search and rescue base in Nunavut.

Parliamentary Budget Officer Members debate a question of privilege regarding the government's delayed response to the Parliamentary Budget Officer's request for information on proposed savings, with the government citing process and employee relations for the delay. 700 words.

Corrections and Conditional Release Act Second reading of Bill C-221. The bill amends the Corrections and Conditional Release Act to require that victims of crime receive not only eligibility and review dates for offenders' temporary absences, releases, or parole, but also an explanation of how these dates were determined. This aims to increase transparency and support victims, who often feel unheard or uninformed by the justice system. The bill builds on previous legislation that received unanimous support. 7200 words, 1 hour.

Adjournment Debates

Rising Food Prices Warren Steinley argues that carbon taxes and packaging taxes drive up food prices, causing an affordability crisis. Wade Grant denies these claims, attributing higher prices to global forces and defending environmental policies as beneficial, not detrimental, to the economy. Steinley cites Sylvain Charlebois's disagreement with Grant.
Fuel tax and affordability Cheryl Gallant criticizes the Liberal government's fuel tax and spending policies, accusing them of corporate welfare and harming affordability for Canadians. Wade Grant defends the government's climate action policies, arguing that they are essential for economic security and a clean energy future.
Fentanyl and meth legality Dan Mazier asks if the Liberals believe smoking fentanyl and meth should be legal. Maggie Chi avoids a direct answer, stating provinces decide on safe consumption sites and the federal government supports communities through targeted investments and enforcement. Mazier repeats his question, but Chi again declines to answer directly.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Natural ResourcesOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Markham—Thornhill Ontario

Liberal

Tim Hodgson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, the Crawford mine will help anchor Canada's leadership in clean industrial materials. It will supply high-grade, low-carbon nickel for batteries in green steel, with projected emissions close to 90% lower than the global average, while creating 1,000 direct jobs and 3,000 indirect jobs over the 40-year mine life. This is an example of acting decisively, building a stronger, more reliant Canada and getting projects built faster with the Major Projects Office.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal government is the most expensive in Canadian history, and every dollar the Prime Minister spends comes out of the pockets of hard-working Canadians, driving up the costs of everything.

Food prices are 50% higher than the target rate, and experts have warned the Liberals that the industrial carbon tax is driving up the cost of fertilizer, farm equipment and food. The Liberals like to say this tax is imaginary, but they are increasing their own imaginary tax in the budget. Is what they tell parents of the 700,000 kids lined up at food banks that they are imagining things?

Why is the Prime Minister increasing the industrial carbon tax when food is already unaffordable?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Malpeque P.E.I.

Liberal

Heath MacDonald LiberalMinister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

Mr. Speaker, this budget meets the moment, speeding up national building projects and boosting trade diversification for agri-food and agriculture, for our economy and for the generations to come that the member speaks of.

There is $150 billion for infrastructure alone in the plan, including for trade corridors, AgriMarketing, AgriStability, the clean fuel regulations and biofuel incentives; CFIA funding for digital trade; and investments in CanExport, EDC and Global Affairs. This is all for trade diversification and growing agriculture. There is also the buy Canada plan, which is so important to all our agriculture farmers and ranchers out there.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:45 p.m.

Conservative

John Barlow Conservative Foothills, AB

Mr. Speaker, what this budget does is put intergenerational debt on Canadian families.

Here is a fact the minister just ignored entirely: Food inflation is rising 40% faster in Canada than it is in the United States. Canada is the only G7 country where food inflation has actually increased for four straight months. We have a record-shattering 2.2 million Canadians forced to go to a food bank in a single month.

Why is the Prime Minister breaking his promise to Canadians, increasing the industrial carbon tax and increasing food costs for Canadians who already cannot afford to put food on the table?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Malpeque P.E.I.

Liberal

Heath MacDonald LiberalMinister of Agriculture and Agri-Food

Mr. Speaker, we all know the Canadian Climate Institute's most recent research shows that industrial carbon pricing systems have essentially no impact on households.

Agriculture plays a significant role in their achievement to lead the G7 nations. We are going to stand alongside our growers, our ranchers and our farmers.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Rosemarie Falk Conservative Battlefords—Lloydminster—Meadow Lake, SK

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal government is the most expensive in Canadian history. Every dollar the Prime Minister spends comes out of the pockets of Canadians and drives up the cost of everything.

The cost of baby formula has jumped nearly 84% since 2017. The growing reports of parents going to desperate measures to feed their babies is truly alarming, yet when the Liberals had a chance to lower food costs, they chose to increase them.

Why is the Prime Minister increasing the industrial carbon tax and making food more expensive?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River Saskatchewan

Liberal

Buckley Belanger LiberalSecretary of State (Rural Development)

Mr. Speaker, I just want to point out that when it comes to the budget, Saskatchewan is watching. Saskatchewan is here.

For 10 years, the Saskatchewan Conservatives have voted against billions of dollars in project commitments and programs that would have helped my home province move faster and build stronger. They did this just for their petty and immature political games.

That ends today, because this Saskatchewan MP is voting for the budget and for the interests of Saskatchewan.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Rosemarie Falk Conservative Battlefords—Lloydminster—Meadow Lake, SK

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal budget and those initiatives are not working. Parents are still struggling to afford baby formula under the Liberal government's watch, and now StatsCan is reporting another year-over-year increase of 6% on the price of baby formula.

The Liberals had a chance to lower food costs for Canadians by scrapping the industrial carbon tax, but they chose to make food more expensive by increasing it, so I will ask this again: Why, when so many parents are struggling to feed their babies, is the Prime Minister increasing the industrial carbon tax and making food more expensive?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Desnethé—Missinippi—Churchill River Saskatchewan

Liberal

Buckley Belanger LiberalSecretary of State (Rural Development)

Mr. Speaker, I know the Conservatives have not developed a budget in the last 10 years, so they are a little out of practice. What part of this budget would they cut? Would it be the RCMP heritage project? Would it be the thousands of houses that we are going to commit to building in Saskatchewan? Would they shut down the nation-building mine in northern Saskatchewan, or take out the $370 million in biofuels to benefit our canola farmers? Would they vote against $257.6 million for firefighting aircraft?

Where would you cut? What would you sacrifice on Saskatchewan's behalf?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

Once again, go through the Chair, please.

The hon. member for Montmorency—Charlevoix.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Conservative

Gabriel Hardy Conservative Montmorency—Charlevoix, QC

Mr. Speaker, I was with a beef farmer in Château-Richer last week, and we were talking about the federal industrial carbon tax, which is driving up the cost of energy, transportation and processing throughout the supply chain. This has resulted in a 17% increase in the price of beef for his customers.

However, he is not the only one noting these increases. According to Statistics Canada, the price of apples, oranges, chicken, fruit juice, carrots and even coffee has risen by 35%. Food prices are rising 40% faster in Canada than in the United States.

Why do the Liberals keep raising the price of groceries for Canadians?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:50 p.m.

Toronto—Danforth Ontario

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin LiberalMinister of Environment and Climate Change

Mr. Speaker, perhaps I should begin with a reminder that industrial carbon pricing does not apply in Quebec. My colleague might want to familiarize himself with the issue. Furthermore, industrial carbon pricing is not what is making food more expensive in Canada.

Our government wants to continue fighting climate change while supporting families across the country. I hope the Conservatives will also decide to help families.

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Gabriel Hardy Conservative Montmorency—Charlevoix, QC

Mr. Speaker, there is another completely made-up tax: the fuel tax.

Yesterday, the Liberals had the opportunity to lower the cost of food by getting rid of the fuel tax, but they chose to keep making food even more expensive. Families and couples where both partners have jobs are coming to food banks in Quebec to get food because they have to choose between putting food on the table, a roof over their heads and gas in their cars to get to work. It will cost Canadian families 17¢ more per litre every time they go to the pump.

Why is the Prime Minister maintaining the fuel tax and continuing to make food even more expensive?

Carbon PricingOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Louis-Hébert Québec

Liberal

Joël Lightbound LiberalMinister of Government Transformation

Mr. Speaker, yesterday, my colleague had the opportunity to vote to lower taxes for 22 million Canadians. Yesterday, he had the opportunity to vote for a school food program for the most vulnerable children in Quebec. Yesterday, he had the opportunity to vote for investments in housing, infrastructure and the Espace Hubert‑Reeves. Yesterday, he had the opportunity to invest in defence to increase the salaries of the men and women in the Canadian Armed Forces, but he voted against all that.

Now, the good news is that he can redeem himself after question period by supporting the ways and means motion. If not, he can always take a walk behind the curtains, like some of his colleagues did.

The EconomyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Jagsharan Singh Mahal Conservative Edmonton Southeast, AB

Mr. Speaker, the Liberal government is the most expensive government in Canadian history. Every dollar the Prime Minister spends comes out of the pockets of Canadians and is driving up the cost of everything. The Liberals could have lowered food costs by scrapping the plastic packaging tax, which drives up the cost of produce by 34% and costs the average household $400; instead, they chose to keep it.

Why is the Prime Minister keeping the packaging tax and making food more expensive?

The EconomyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Toronto—Danforth Ontario

Liberal

Julie Dabrusin LiberalMinister of Environment and Climate Change

Mr. Speaker, why does the member opposite keep choosing to make things up? There is no plastic packaging tax. Does he want me to repeat it for him?

I wish the Conservatives would look at the facts, and I wish they would work with us to continue to work for Canadians.

The EconomyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Clarke, ON

Mr. Speaker, every dollar the Liberals spend comes out of the pockets of hard-working Canadians. Senior Liberal appointee Pierre Tremblay nearly doubled his former travel budget to allow him to spend thousands of dollars on unnecessary limo rides.

Instead of asking young Canadians to sacrifice their future, why does the Prime Minister not ask one of his top bureaucrats to maybe sacrifice a limo ride here and there?

The EconomyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Markham—Thornhill Ontario

Liberal

Tim Hodgson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, the government is spending less so we can invest more. We have invested $60 billion in the first tranche of major projects and $57 billion in the second tranche. This is creating jobs and making Canada stronger.

The EconomyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Conservative

Philip Lawrence Conservative Northumberland—Clarke, ON

Mr. Speaker, we have heard that tired line from the current government and the previous one: “Canadians have never had it so good”, but the reality is that Canadians are struggling, families are struggling and workers are struggling, yet the government keeps defending the indefensible. While Canadians are lined up in record numbers at food banks, Liberal bureaucrats are living the Liberal life of luxury.

Will the government take any disciplinary action against the individual and maybe even curtail his travel budget?

The EconomyOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Markham—Thornhill Ontario

Liberal

Tim Hodgson LiberalMinister of Energy and Natural Resources

Mr. Speaker, the agency is an independent agency. It does good work and is helping us build a nuclear future for this country. We are building at Darlington, we are building at Pickering and we are building at Bruce. We are building Canada strong.

Canadian Identity and CultureOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Liberal

Marianne Dandurand Liberal Compton—Stanstead, QC

Mr. Speaker, in regions like mine, the Eastern Townships, we have local media and cultural organizations, both anglophone and francophone, that play an essential role in keeping us informed and keeping our culture alive. Today, with the rise of digital technology and globalization, the ways we stay informed and consume culture are evolving.

I would like to ask the Minister of Canadian Identity and Culture how our government will protect and promote the rich culture and diversity that make our region so strong.

Canadian Identity and CultureOral Questions

2:55 p.m.

Laurier—Sainte-Marie Québec

Liberal

Steven Guilbeault LiberalMinister of Canadian Identity and Culture and Minister responsible for Official Languages

Mr. Speaker, in the face of global uncertainty, it is vital that we protect our identity and our cultural sovereignty. That is why budget 2025 invests historic amounts in culture, identity and media, including $38 million for local media across the country. The government made a strategic choice to strengthen our cultural and media sectors by investing $150 million in CBC/Radio-Canada. This sector accounts for $65 billion in GDP and nearly 670,000 jobs.

To invest in our cultural sovereignty is to invest in our future and preserve the stories told—

Canadian Identity and CultureOral Questions

3 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

The hon. member for Windsor West.

Public SafetyOral Questions

3 p.m.

Conservative

Harb Gill Conservative Windsor West, ON

Mr. Speaker, extortion is out of control. It is up 330% across Canada and nearly 360% in Ontario since 2015. Two weeks ago a home in Windsor got sprayed with bullets in an extortion attack. As a former police officer, I know that criminals are taking advantage of our weak bail laws and the lack of tools for law enforcement.

Canadians deserve safety, not excuses. When will the Liberals get serious and support our Conservative plan to crack down on rampant extortion and protect our communities? For God's sake, will they do something?

Public SafetyOral Questions

November 18th, 2025 / 3 p.m.

Brampton North—Caledon Ontario

Liberal

Ruby Sahota LiberalSecretary of State (Combatting Crime)

Mr. Speaker, we take extortion very seriously in Canada. Extortion with a firearm carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.

Extortionists think they are not going to get caught. Do members know why that is? It is because we have not given law enforcement the tools they need to catch extortionists. Those tools are in our Bill C-2, but Conservatives do not agree with the bill and will not give our police lawful access tools in order to catch extortionists, so they know they are going to get away with it.