House of Commons Hansard #53 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was investments.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Financial Statement of Minister of Finance Members debate the government's budgetary policy. Conservatives criticize high deficits, inflation, and taxes, arguing it harms small businesses and affordability. Liberals defend generational investments in social programs, infrastructure, and defence, claiming it builds a stronger economy. The Bloc Québécois criticizes insufficient provincial transfers and continued oil subsidies. The NDP raises concerns about mental health and veterans' support. 14500 words, 2 hours in 2 segments: 1 2.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives heavily criticize the government's record spending and largest budget deficit outside of COVID. They argue this fuels inflation and unaffordability, leading to 2.2 million Canadians using food banks. They condemn the industrial carbon tax for raising food costs and the luxury tax cut for private jets, while highlighting massive interest payments.
The Liberals focus on the 67,000 new jobs created and promote Budget 2025 as building a strong economy. They highlight investments in housing, healthcare, Indigenous services, and the military, alongside tax cuts and initiatives to fight climate change and support francophone immigration.
The Bloc criticizes the government's budget for failing to meet Quebec's needs in areas like health care and housing, accusing Liberals of pandering to Conservatives instead. They also raise concerns about lobster smuggling and political interference in fisheries enforcement.
The Greens raise concerns about the growing ecological deficit due to inaction on climate and nature for future generations.
The NDP criticize the Liberal budget's climate plan for ignoring future generations and demand renewed funding for Indigenous friendship centres.

An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to survivor pension benefits First reading of Bill C-256. The bill aims to eliminate a "gold digger clause" denying survivor pension benefits to spouses of veterans and federal civil servants who married after age 60, described as "archaic" and "sexist." 400 words.

Petitions

Jail Not Bail Act Second reading of Bill C-242. The bill, C-242, aims to amend the Criminal Code to prioritize public safety in bail decisions, especially for repeat violent offenders. It proposes repealing the principle of restraint, expanding reverse onus, and tightening risk assessment. Conservatives support it for safer streets. Liberals call it constitutionally questionable and redundant, citing their own Bill C-14 as a responsible alternative. The Bloc Québécois raises constitutional principles and prison capacity concerns. 8300 words, 1 hour.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Bill C-256 An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to survivor pension benefitsRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

moved for leave to introduce Bill C-256, An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to survivor pension benefits.

Mr. Speaker, it is an honour to introduce this bill just ahead of Remembrance Day next week. The bill seeks to eliminate the gold digger clause that penalizes the spouses of veterans who married after the age of 60.

As the law currently stands, these spouses are stripped of any survivor benefits. This archaic relic of the early 1990s is a sexist holdover of a bygone era. It was as sexist then as it is today. My hope is that we, as parliamentarians, and more broadly as a society, have evolved enough to agree that there is no excuse for continuing to accept the errors of the ways of the past by allowing outdated discriminatory policies to remain in place.

To that end, my bill would amend certain acts related to survivor pension benefits so that spouses of veterans, Canadian military, RCMP and federal civil servants who marry after the age of 60 are not punished for having found love later in life.

I want to thank the member for Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie for seconding this bill.

I would highlight that it was a decade ago when former prime minister Justin Trudeau mandated his then minister to address this archaic clause. It is shameful that it remains within our statutes today.

Lastly, on the eve of Remembrance Day, as we honour those who have bravely served our country with courage and dignity, I encourage the government to honour them and their families, not only with words but also with action, by finally eliminating this punitive and sexist policy, which is a remaining blight on the country our veterans have sacrificed so much to protect.

I want to thank former MP Rachel Blaney and former MP Irene Mathyssen for also tabling this bill in the past.

(Motions deemed adopted, bill read the first time and printed)

Bill C-256 An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to survivor pension benefitsRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

The other day the Speaker made a ruling on members standing up to address petitions, saying that they are supposed to be sticking to the essence of the petition. I would just ask that we review the comments for private members' bills and likewise have the Speaker provide guidance on what is expected when a private member's bill is introduced.

Bill C-256 An Act to amend certain Acts in relation to survivor pension benefitsRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

It is noted. I thank the hon. parliamentary secretary, and we will take it under advisement.

Public SafetyPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:15 p.m.

Conservative

Dan Mazier Conservative Riding Mountain, MB

Mr. Speaker, it is a privilege to present a petition to voice the concerns of the people of Riding Mountain.

Over the last two years, I have risen on behalf of the over 2,000 people who live in Swan River and the surrounding area who have signed this petition to voice their concerns about crime. The petitioners in Swan River have seen their petitions presented in the House over and over again, more than 75 times, yet the government has not addressed their concerns.

Unfortunately, citizens and business owners in the Swan River Valley continue to suffer. The petitioners say that Liberal policy has allowed violent repeat offenders to run free, instead of putting these criminals in jail, which is where they belong. Petitioners know that there is so much more action that could be taken to combat crime and make the streets in Swan River a safer place.

This is why the people of Swan River continue to demand jail, not bail, for violent repeat offenders. I will always support the good people of Swan River—

Public SafetyPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

The hon. member for York—Durham.

Invasive SpeciesPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Jacob Mantle Conservative York—Durham, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am presenting a petition today on behalf of the town of Georgina, specifically the residents in the community of Keswick, about a new invasive aquatic species known as water soldier.

It was discovered in Cook's Bay, in Lake Simcoe, in 2024 and confirmed by water soldier working group, particularly because of the efforts of the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters.

Water soldier, this invasive aquatic species, is a threat to human health because it is serrated and can injure people. It is also threat to our local agriculture because of its proximity to the Holland River, an important water source for agricultural operations.

The petitioners are calling on the government to do three things: list water soldier as an invasive species; nominate a single federal department to take responsibility; and allocate sufficient funding.

I would note that, instead, the government cut $700,000 from the Canada Water Agency.

Invasive SpeciesPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order.

The petition was going along so great until the last point, when the member decided to include his own personal commentary about the petition. He is a new member, so perhaps the Speaker could remind him of the rules for introducing a petition.

Invasive SpeciesPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

I thank the chief government whip for that reminder. Yes, the Speaker has made a ruling reminding both new and returning members to keep petitions short when tabling them and to not refer to whether they support the contents of the petition personally but to just report to the House the contents of said petition.

To the chief government whip, I was about to rise to interrupt the member because he was over time at that point.

The parliamentary secretary to the government House leader has the floor.

JusticePetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, it is with pleasure that I table a petition that was circulated by Debbie Johnson, who is a very strong advocate. The petition is asking Parliament to do more for families of victims. She had a personal tragedy with respect to her son Adam, who was murdered. She is hoping that we would see a more collaborative approach to ensuring that there is justice for all, including for her son and her family.

Electric VehiclesPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Ned Kuruc Conservative Hamilton East—Stoney Creek, ON

Mr. Speaker, today I rise on behalf of 23,576 Canadians to present e-petition 6790. Canadians have spoken, loud and clear, and have displayed their opposition to the Liberals' EV mandate, which is economically harmful and risks job losses and delayed investment in Canada's auto sector, which is already dealing with the crippling effects of tariffs coming from south of the border.

This petition calls on the government to repeal the federal EV mandate, ensure consumer choice, rather than government-imposed quotas, and adopt policies that improve EV affordability.

Friendship CentresPetitionsRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

NDP

Gord Johns NDP Courtenay—Alberni, BC

Mr. Speaker, I rise to bring forward a petition on behalf of Canadians who are calling for enhanced support for friendship centres. The petitioners highlight that friendship centres are vital community hubs that provide culturally appropriate services in health, education, housing, employment and youth programming. The petitioners note that governments have increasingly relied on these centres to respond to socio-economic conditions, climate emergencies and the toxic drug crisis, yet federal funding has not kept pace with inflation or the real cost of services since 2005.

The petitioners therefore call on the Government of Canada to provide enhanced, stable and predictable funding; invest in the modernization of facilities; and fully recognize the critical role that friendship centres play in reconciliation and in supporting indigenous peoples across urban, rural and remote communities.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Mr. Speaker, if the government's responses to Questions Nos. 349, 350, 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, 356 and 357could be made orders for returns, these returns would be tabled in an electronic format immediately.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

Is it agreed?

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Finally, Mr. Speaker, I ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

Is it agreed?

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

[For text of questions and responses, see Written Questions website]

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:25 p.m.

Conservative

Jacob Mantle Conservative York—Durham, ON

Mr. Speaker, on a point of order, in the previous portion of Routine Proceedings, the member for Kingston and the Islands suggested that I introduced my personal opinion while presenting the petition. I wanted to clarify that I did not do so. Instead, I simply recited a fact from the budget, so that was not my personal—

Questions Passed as Orders for ReturnRoutine Proceedings

12:25 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Tom Kmiec

This is a matter of debate. I took in what was mentioned by all members. Going back, there is a ruling from the Speaker on the length that petitions are supposed to be. That is definitely debate.

The House resumed consideration of the motion that this House approve in general the budgetary policy of the government and of the amendment.

Financial Statement of Minister of FinanceThe BudgetGovernment Orders

12:25 p.m.

Bloc

Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon, QC

Mr. Speaker, I have the privilege of sharing my time with my friend, the chief whip of the Bloc Québécois and member for Berthier—Maskinongé.

Before I begin my speech, I would like to take a moment to congratulate the 25 mayors in my riding who had the pleasure of being elected or re-elected. I would also like to congratulate all the municipal councillors who were elected on November 2 in Quebec's municipal elections. I want to assure them of my collaboration, as always. Together, we can achieve big changes and transform the world.

I am pleased to speak to the budget. As I was saying to one of my colleagues, I have no problem voting against the budget. In my riding, throughout the election, the voice of seniors was heard. In the riding of Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon, seniors aged 65 and over represent nearly 20% of the population. I can confirm that seniors got their message across. People who receive OAS and GIS get a little less than $2,000 a month.

I do not know what the situation is like in my colleagues' ridings, but in my riding, there is virtually no housing available for less than $1,100 or $1,200 per month. I would say that is a major obstacle for our seniors. That is what people talked to me about during the election campaign. They were saying how outrageous the situation had become. They asked me why our voices were not being heard when it comes to increasing OAS. We know that the Liberal government continues to discriminate against seniors between the ages of 65 and 74, whose pensions did not increase. Every year, their purchasing power diminishes because the cost of everything is going up, while their income remains the same. I find that unacceptable.

I often say that I spent my career helping seniors as a social worker and housing manager for seniors. I can say that there is absolutely nothing in this budget to support seniors so that they can get through the difficult times we are currently experiencing. There is nothing except the New Horizons for Seniors program. It is insulting to see that this is the only budget measure specifically for seniors. I find that really shameful.

Tax incentives could have been offered so that healthy seniors who want to work would not have to work for peanuts. If a senior wants to work, their income should increase, not decrease. Those who receive the GIS, who work and earn a certain income, have to pay taxes. That does not necessarily improve their living conditions. The tax rate is high for people who earn an income in addition to receiving the GIS. There is nothing for seniors and it really bothers me to see how insensitive the government is toward seniors, both in the Trudeau era and now.

The government also lacks sensitivity when it comes to infrastructure. Provincial finance ministers had requested $100 billion over 10 years to do major work on infrastructure related to health and social services and municipal infrastructure such as water and sewer systems.

Infrastructure is what allows municipalities to deliver more density in housing. It provides access to water and ensures proper water treatment, for example. That is expensive. There is a lot of catching up to do when it comes to all this municipal infrastructure. It was an important request, yet what do we see in the budget? It looks like there is an investment of $50 billion when we first read the budget, but then we realize that it is not really $50 billion in new money. Instead, it is about $9 billion.

I do not know if people are aware of this, but a hospital is being built in Vaudreuil, in my riding. Building a hospital costs at least $4 billion or $5 billion dollars. That is for a single hospital, so it is understandable that the provincial leaders are extremely disappointed with the budget. Quebec, for one, had high hopes of receiving at least a few billion dollars a year to be able to meet its significant infrastructure demands. Now, the Minister of Finance is telling us that Quebec will be getting approximately $375 million a year. To give an idea of the scale, Quebec spends about $19 billion on infrastructure each year. What they are offering is peanuts. It is not nearly enough to enable municipalities and provinces to meet the challenges of modernizing their infrastructure as well as meet infrastructure requirements for schools, hospitals and long-term care facilities.

What the budget tells Quebec and the provinces is that the federal government is going to aggravate their public finance crisis. That is extremely serious because we send part of our taxes to the federal government and Ottawa is supposed to redistribute them. What we are seeing is that the government is keeping that money for itself and choosing what it wants to invest in. The choices it is making are not in the best interests of Quebec and Quebeckers. I think that the Minister of Finance made that quite clear.

Members know that health transfers are something that I care a lot about. As I said, I worked in health and social services in Quebec, in both the independent community system and the public system, and I can tell you one thing: Right now, everyone is stretched thin because they are trying to do more with less and meet the desperate needs of citizens. They have less with which to respond to those needs because the money is in Ottawa. I heard the Minister of Industry say that the government increased health transfers in the budget, but if we look carefully, we see that it is not a real increase because the system costs are higher. They are at 6%. There is a 5% increase, but if we look at the fine print, we see that some programs will be done away with as of 2028 and that funding will be cut.

That is unacceptable. If the government is aware of the Quebec communities' needs, then it is aware that we need a massive injection of money. I think that Quebec is now on its sixth health and social services reform because we are trying everything we can to better meet the health and social services needs of Quebeckers with the money that we have, so I am sure the government will understand why I am so disappointed.

What also surprised me was how the small business sector reacted. I read that the Canadian Federation of Independent Business has said that, no matter how much its members read, they could not find anything for SMEs. Everything is going to the oil companies. There is loads of money for oil companies, but nothing really meaningful for our SMEs in terms of tax relief or support, especially for companies that are being hit hard by the tariff war with the United States. I am talking about small businesses involved in the secondary processing of aluminum, for example. There is very little on the table for them, or at least that is what the Canadian Federation of Independent Business is saying. It is the oil companies that really hit the jackpot with this budget. Oil companies are getting more than $100 billion in renewed and increased tax credits.

When I am sitting across from a vulnerable senior, I have to try to explain why this government decided to spoil the oil companies, which are already very well supported and have plenty of money. Directing those funds to oil companies means two things. It means the government is turning its back on seniors, municipalities and the provinces. It also means it is giving up on the fight against climate change. We in the Bloc Québécois are calling it climate capitulation. Everything related to climate change has been dropped, and I think that is shameful.

Financial Statement of Minister of FinanceThe BudgetGovernment Orders

12:35 p.m.

Liberal

Guillaume Deschênes-Thériault Liberal Madawaska—Restigouche, NB

Mr. Speaker, the budget contains a lot of good news for Quebeckers, especially those in the riding of our colleague from Gaspésie—Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine—Listuguj, with the extension of the Magdalen Islands airport runway. The Bloc Québécois has championed this project a number of times.

There are also investments for the Forillon shipyards in Gaspé. Montreal's Biosphere is going to receive $9 million over three years. Other investments are on the way for a sports centre in Montreal North. These infrastructure investments are priorities for Quebeckers.

I would like to know whether my colleague is going to vote in favour of the budget and support these important investments, some of which the Bloc Québécois has been calling for for quite some time.

Financial Statement of Minister of FinanceThe BudgetGovernment Orders

12:35 p.m.

Bloc

Claude DeBellefeuille Bloc Beauharnois—Salaberry—Soulanges—Huntingdon, QC

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my colleague, whom I appreciate, for his question. This gives me an opportunity to tell him that it is about time, since it has been quite a few years.

My colleague from Gaspésie—Les Îles‑de‑la‑Madeleine—Listuguj said that we have been asking for this money for the airport runway for years. It is about time. Yes, it is good, but is it enough? Is it enough to convince seniors and Quebec's finance minister to support the budget? I do not think so.

I believe that the Liberals have a duty to ensure that the infrastructure they are responsible for runs smoothly. It is great that they are doing this for the Magdalen Islands, but, honestly, there are other more pressing matters that are missing from this budget.

Financial Statement of Minister of FinanceThe BudgetGovernment Orders

12:35 p.m.

Conservative

Alex Ruff Conservative Bruce—Grey—Owen Sound, ON

Mr. Speaker, the question I have for my Bloc colleague is with respect to the question of privilege the Bloc raised earlier about the budget with the annexes only being presented in a digital format.

Within that, there is reference to about 75 legislative changes that would impact different demographics in Canada, particularly seniors. One of the things it is bringing back, which is currently in Bill C-2, is this restriction on $10,000 in cash. I just want to know if the member has similar concerns around seniors.

There are minority communities, like the Amish and Old Order Mennonites, who do not use phones or Internet and do not have access to technology. I have this concern about, basically, bringing things in through an omnibus bill and the impact it would have on seniors.