House of Commons Hansard #92 of the 45th Parliament, 1st session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was iran.

Topics

line drawing of robot

This summary is computer-generated. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Export and Import Permits Act Second reading of Bill C-233. The bill aims to amend the Export and Import Permits Act to close dangerous loopholes in Canada's arms export regime, particularly the exemption for exports to the United States. Supporters argue it ensures Canada's international obligations and prevents human rights violations. Opponents, including the Bloc and Conservatives, warn it is too rigid, could harm Canadian industry, and strain alliances and the crucial defence relationship with the U.S. 6900 words, 1 hour.

Government Business No. 6—Proceedings on Bill C-9 Members debate a motion to expedite Bill C-9, which aims to combat hate propaganda, hate crimes, and protect access to religious sites. Liberals and the Bloc Québécois support the motion, citing Conservative filibustering and the urgent need to address rising hate-motivated violence. Conservatives oppose limiting debate, arguing the bill, particularly the removal of the religious exemption, threatens freedom of religion and expression, and that the government is censoring discussion on a "censorship bill." 15800 words, 2 hours.

Statements by Members

Question Period

The Conservatives criticize the Liberal government's economic policies, including the fuel standard and industrial carbon tax, for driving record inflation and shrinking the economy. They demand action on rising food costs. The party also raises concerns about national security, calling for the deportation of IRGC members and supporting energy development.
The Liberals emphasize Canada's strong economy and its role as an energy superpower, citing record oil production and critical mineral investments. They promote affordability through tax cuts, social programs like child care and the Canada groceries and essentials benefit, and modernizing benefit delivery. The party also addresses national security and the removal of IRGC members.
The Bloc criticizes the Cúram software for its cost overruns, impacting 85,000 seniors, and demands an independent public inquiry. They also seek social licence for rail expropriations.
The Greens criticize Canada's foreign policy for supporting illegal attacks by the United States and Israel against Iran.

Canada Post Corporation Act First reading of Bill C-262. The bill aims to modernize and standardize direct-to-consumer shipping of Canadian wine, beer, and spirits across provincial borders, creating a national framework to replace current provincial rules. 300 words.

Petitions

Build Canada Homes Act Second reading of Bill C-20. The bill aims to establish Build Canada Homes, a Crown corporation, to increase affordable housing supply and promote efficient building techniques. The Liberal government states it will fast-track construction, use federal lands, and leverage partnerships, backed by a $13 billion investment. Conservatives criticize it as a fourth bureaucracy that will not solve the housing crisis, citing past Liberal failures and proposing tax cuts and reduced red tape instead. The Bloc Québécois argues housing is provincial jurisdiction and advocates for unconditional federal transfers to Quebec. 26100 words, 3 hours.

Iran and the Middle East Members debate the hostilities in Iran and the Middle East and their impact on Canadians abroad. The Liberals emphasize de-escalation, civilian protection, and consular support for Canadians, while Conservatives criticize the government's "incoherent and contradictory" position on U.S. air strikes. The Bloc Québécois stresses the importance of consulting allies and preparing contingency plans, and the NDP condemns the strikes as illegal under international law, urging a return to diplomacy. 31600 words, 4 hours.

Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Mr. Chair, I respectfully disagree with my colleague on the issue of international law. I would put to her three points. First, the right of sovereignty is properly understood to be invested in the Iranian people, not in their oppressors and occupiers, the Iranian people who have taken to the streets, demanded change, been brutally slaughtered and are asking for action to protect them. Second, we have a responsibility to protect people who are being slaughtered by the regime that occupies them, people who have done everything they can but do not have the means to displace this regime without outside intervention. Third, the member would have us go to the UN Security Council where Russia, in the midst of its slaughter of civilians in Ukraine, could veto interventions against its ally and enabler, Iran.

What does the member offer in response to these points that, practically, would help the Iranian people get out of this?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:25 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Mr. Chair, it is not possible to rewrite the United Nations Charter from a desk in this place. It is the case that sovereign nation-states are recognized for their sovereignty as nation-states.

I will agree with the hon. member. I, myself, dislike the Iranian regime, but the sovereignty of that nation does not rest in its people, unfortunately, any more than the sovereignty of any nation can be determined by public opinion polls.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:25 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

Madam Chair, I have a simple question for my colleague. Humanitarian support absolutely has its place and must be deployed because the situation over there is extremely serious. However, does she agree that, at this point in time, not one soldier should be deployed over there for military purposes?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:25 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Chair, I agree with my colleague 100%. The Government of Canada must not support illegal wars.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:25 p.m.

Liberal

Anthony Housefather Liberal Mount Royal, QC

Madam Chair, there is a rogue regime that promotes terrorism abroad, threatens communities across the world, is on the verge of getting a nuclear weapon and has an ally in the Security Council that would veto any action the United Nations would take against it. Is the hon. member saying that the world should then do absolutely nothing and allow that country to get a nuclear weapon and destroy the world?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:30 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Chair, the member for Mount Royal knows that is absolutely not the position Greens would take. We do believe that there can be multilateral diplomatic efforts, and we have always supported that the people of Iran deserve to be protected.

Unfortunately, the responsibility to protect doctrine was wrecked when Canada went along with bombing Libya until Libya became a failed state and we destroyed the opportunity to use responsibility to protect. It is a nascent notion in international law. We must defend it, and we should be able to use it, but only within the constraints of those things that are legal.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:30 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

Madam Chair, I have a follow-up to my previous question. The member's answer, as I understood it, was that we have to respect the existing recognition of sovereignty for an autocratic regime that is slaughtering its people, because apparently the UN charter says we have to. I disagree with that interpretation. There are plenty of legal bases for believing we can and should respond, including the fact that we have been attacked.

However, more fundamentally, does the member not think we have a moral obligation to stand with the innocent, and that when we see before our eyes thousands of people being slaughtered simply for peacefully protesting, do we not have at some point a moral obligation to say that the processes at the United Nations are not working, that we will not allow Vladimir Putin to veto action and that the moral, the just and the right thing is to stand with those people who are being slaughtered rather than to look away on the basis of a legal technicality?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:30 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Chair, the United Nations Charter is not a legal technicality. If we did not have it, this world would be in a great deal more trouble.

However, I do agree with the hon. member. We should not turn away. We should never have turned away. We should not have allowed what happened in Syria to happen, with the butcher al-Assad killing his people. We turned away because it was difficult, but a community of nations working together can take action, and we need to revive the doctrine of the responsibility to protect.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:30 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk, QC

Madam Chair, we have come together this evening to talk about the war currently in progress in the Middle East. My late father was a Second World War veteran. He was decorated with the Legion of Honour and wounded twice on the battlefield. He always told me that nothing was uglier in life than war. As a small child, I asked my mother, if war is so ugly, why did Dad go? My mother told me that my father fought during the war so that I would not have to.

My reason for bringing this up is that, as we speak, millions of people from this great nation are experiencing the insecurity of war. When I say “great nation”, I want to call attention to the words of my colleague from Calgary Heritage, who mentioned just a few minutes ago that Iranians do indeed represent a great, millennia-old nation that has played a major role in our lives today and whose achievements benefit us to this day.

We support the Iranian people, who have been struggling for 47 years with the dangers of living under the regime of the ayatollahs in Tehran. I can never talk about this people without remembering that, for 47 years, they have suffered under the yoke and terrifying violence of the Ayatollah regime. That has been going on since 1979. Keep in mind that we Canadians, in late 1979, 1980, helped Americans escape Tehran when the Ayatollah regime let terrorists enter the U.S. embassy. This was one of the most illustrious pages in Canada's diplomatic history. For 47 years, a repressive, tyrannical, theocratic dictatorship has held sway in this country. That dictatorship is the main source of terror in Iran, in the Middle East and across the world, even here in Canada. I will come back to that a little later.

My colleagues also mentioned that the country really does present a nuclear threat. They mentioned that, unfortunately, these people could indeed be prepared to build nuclear weapons, that they have massacred their own people for not sharing the views of the Ayatollah regime, that they shot down a civilian aircraft carrying 55 Canadian citizens and some 30 permanent residents, Canadians who were targeted by the Iranian regime. They orchestrated the attacks of October 7, 2023, and, yes, they are a daily threat here in Canada. Our intelligence service informs us that there are hundreds, even up to 700 people, in our country currently acting under the orders of the Iranian regime. We can talk about this with the great Irwin Cotler, who fortunately was not targeted, but who was targeted by the Iranian regime.

As strange as it may sound, the one good thing in times of war is that political partisanship is set aside, although maybe not entirely. Just because partisanship lessens does not mean we should turn a blind eye to the actions of our government, and I mean our government as Canadians. Canadians have noticed that, since this event, the Prime Minister has had a varied attitude, to say the least and to put it politely.

Initially, the Prime Minister expressed full support for the action taken by Israel and the United States. The next day, he said that he reluctantly supported it, but that he was not giving carte blanche. First flip-flop, second flip-flop, third flip-flop. He then called for de-escalation. Finally, he raised the possibility of military involvement. That is four flip-flops in a short period of time for such a serious situation. With all due respect to the Prime Minister, with all due respect to the office he holds, there can be no denying that he was unclear. In times of war, it is essential to be clear. I urge the Prime Minister to pull himself together.

We support the initiatives of both Israel and the United States, because we believe that the Ayatollah regime must indeed come to an end. The crimes, murders and atrocities it has been perpetrating for 47 years are completely unworthy of a civilized society, especially one as rich and as inspiring as the Iranian nation. That is why we support the military initiative while, of course, hoping for an end to hostilities.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:35 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Madam Chair, I am surprised to see that the Liberals are not really participating in the debate, even though they are the ones who requested it, but these things happen.

My question for my colleague is simple.

Canada is blindly supporting the offensive currently being waged by Donald Trump and the Israelis. However, according to Donald Trump, the logical next step would be for him to personally choose the next regime and the next leader of Iran.

Does my colleague not believe that there is a danger in blindly supporting this offensive, knowing full well that it should be up to the people of Iran to choose their future and their political regime? I am sure my colleague agrees with me on this. That is clearly my position. Those who support Donald Trump are also supporting his desire to decide who will lead Iran following the offensive he has launched.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:35 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk, QC

Madam Chair, I want to thank my colleague for always asking relevant questions. I was talking about Irwin Cotler earlier. I know that my colleague knows him well, that Mr. Cotler knows him too, that my colleague has a lot of respect for him and that Mr. Cotler has a lot of respect for him too. Mr. Cotler is currently being targeted by the tyrannical regime of the ayatollahs and by the regime in Tehran. I was careful not to say “by Iran”, because it is really the regime in Tehran and the regime of the ayatollahs.

As I said, there is nothing nice about war. What we want is for this terrorist regime to be wiped out and replaced by honest people who will serve their nation and their people. That is what the Iranian people are demanding, and that is what they are entitled to. Unfortunately, that was taken away from them 47 years ago.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:40 p.m.

Conservative

Shuv Majumdar Conservative Calgary Heritage, AB

Madam Chair, I want to take a minute to congratulate my colleague for his incredible speech and for his clarity of moral conviction and our national interests. He has been a powerful voice in Parliament for the people of Quebec, and they must be confused about what the Prime Minister and the foreign minister have said over the past week: four positions over four days, and still no clarity in tonight's take-note debate.

I would ask my friend and hon. colleague this: What do Quebeckers think of the confused, equivocating and unprincipled Liberals?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:40 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk, QC

Madam Chair, in Quebec and across Canada, people are wondering where the Prime Minister is. Where is the Prime Minister in this debate? Where is the Prime Minister in this arena that we call the House of Commons?

Davos is all well and good. Travelling around the planet is all well and good. Visiting with the leaders of parties and countries is all well and good. This, however, is the reality. The reason he is the Prime Minister of Canada today is because millions of Canadians exercised their right to vote and wanted this Prime Minister to take action for Canada in Canada.

He is not even here in the House of Commons.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:40 p.m.

Liberal

The Deputy Chair Liberal Alexandra Mendes

The hon. member knows that we are not permitted to mention whether members are present or absence in the House. I would ask him to withdraw that comment.

The hon. member for Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:40 p.m.

Bloc

Simon-Pierre Savard-Tremblay Bloc Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton, QC

Madam Chair, my colleague is of course talking about this regime change, which is a good thing in itself.

Here is my first question. When has it ever worked? In Iraq, for example, did a regime change imposed by an attacking force go well?

Second, during the Obama era, an agreement was reached to limit Iran's nuclear capabilities and control its ballistic missile program. China was there, Russia was there and the United States was there. The United Kingdom, Germany, France and Iran signed it, and it led Iran to relinquish 95% of its uranium stockpile, while providing inspectors with free access to its nuclear power plants.

Is that not a sign that diplomacy does work when an effort is made?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:40 p.m.

Conservative

Gérard Deltell Conservative Louis-Saint-Laurent—Akiawenhrahk, QC

Madam Chair, absolutely, when diplomacy is done well, it works. It is no coincidence that Canada invented the concept of peacekeepers. However, we cannot rewrite history. We can write it, though.

For 47 years, this tyrannical regime has been imposing its abhorrent dictatorship on a nation that does not deserve it. It is time to take action; there are clearly countries that feel directly threatened by its nuclear program. Also, here in Canada, there are citizens who are threatened by hundreds of people scattered across the country who are controlled by the Tehran regime and want to impose their law here.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:40 p.m.

Conservative

Costas Menegakis Conservative Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Madam Chair, I would like to begin by reminding members from the governing party what it is we are actually speaking about today. We are talking about the oppressive and brutal Iranian regime, the very regime that for 47 years has perpetrated atrocities on its own people and supported and wreaked havoc throughout the whole Middle East region and other places around the world.

Let me bring up a couple of examples. Justice 88 is a group that commemorates, on an annual basis, what happened in 1988, when this very brutal Iranian regime decided to arbitrarily murder 30,000 people it claimed to be political prisoners in its prisons in one shot.

Majid Reza Rahnavard was a very vibrant young man who dared to speak truth to power and wanted democracy in his own country. Not only did the Iranian regime murder him, but hanged him from a crane in Mashhad so that anybody driving by could see that, if they dared speak one word against the regime, they would hang there dead for their fellow citizens to see.

Mahsa Amini was a 22-year-old young lady who was wearing a hijab, but it was not to the liking of a particular IRGC monster who wanted it lowered to her eyebrows. When she questioned why, she was brutally murdered. Many members stood up and made statements in the House about Mahsa Amini, I want to remind the hon. members in the House.

Another atrocious monster programmed the machine, pushed the button and fired not one, but two missiles into a civilian plane, flight PS752, murdering 55 Canadians, 30 permanent Canadian residents and a total of 176 people, including children.

This is who we are talking about when we are talking about de-escalation and diplomacy. We cannot have diplomacy with people who behave like this. These are not normal human beings.

Here in Canada, Iranian communities are living in fear that someone is in our community who is going to squeal on them and something is going to happen to their families back home or they will live in danger in their own homes in the communities that we represent. I represent an area of the York region that is the heart of the Iranian Canadian community in Canada.

Repeatedly, we have seen these things, yet we see a Prime Minister who has decided to be radio silent in Parliament on this issue. He has not stood in his place, he has not addressed Parliament and he has not voiced any opinion except when someone puts a microphone in his face wherever he is travelling around the world doing his own things. Four different times, he has changed his mind on how he sees the effort of the United States and Israel and the incursion into Iran. What they are doing is trying to help the Iranian people get their country back and to have their own voice. It is a very inconsistent and incoherent message coming from the Prime Minister of Canada. It is unfair to Iranians. It certainly is unfair to all Canadians, especially Canadians in a very vibrant, dynamic Iranian community.

Flip-flopping on issues like this is not advisable at any time, but especially in this particular instance.

Today, I gave notice of a motion at the citizenship and immigration committee that would, amongst other things, do a few things to address the abysmal record of the immigration file of the Liberal government's seven ministers in the last 10 years. In a nutshell, in the interest of time, I asked to expedite the deportation of non-citizens known to be IRGC operatives and to release the name of the individual reported on February 6, 2026, who asked and obtained the right for his name not to be revealed, who is known to be an IRGC operative. The names of all IRGC operatives and all people threatening people in our communities in Canada must be disclosed expeditiously so people in Canada can live safely.

Iranian Canadians and Canadians across our nation deserve to live in safe communities. Canadians have a right to live in safety. It is the responsibility of the Prime Minister and the government to ensure that we unequivocally support the overthrow of the brutal Iranian regime and return the beautiful country of Iran back to its people.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:45 p.m.

Conservative

Shuv Majumdar Conservative Calgary Heritage, AB

Madam Chair, I remain a huge fan of your work and your stewardship in this chamber. I am pleased to speak before you today.

I would like to take a minute to congratulate my colleague, the member for Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill. He has been a powerful voice for the great people of his communities. We are so honoured to have him in this Parliament to champion their cause and be such a clarion voice for their interests, their values and their dignity.

I would like to ask the hon. member for his assessment of what his constituents are advising him, with respect to the confusion they have heard from Liberal leaders giving four different messages over four days in the period of a week. Even during tonight's take-note debate, we do not have a clear sense of what the government's actual position is. That must cause a great deal of grief and pain.

I am curious what the hon. member thinks.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:45 p.m.

Conservative

Costas Menegakis Conservative Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Madam Chair, in fact, not only the community itself but friends of the community gathered together with hundreds of thousands of people gathering over roughly the past 10 days. There were 350,000 people who gathered in Richmond Hill with one voice, asking for the overthrow of the regime, asking for support of the American and Israeli effort to overthrow the Iranian government.

People are fed up. They are fed up because they are living in fear. They are fed up because of what is happening to their families back home. Their loved ones are being taken out of their homes, beaten to death because they dared to say, “We want to have a voice in how we are governed”. That is what we are dealing with. It is a brutal regime. With people that behave like that, we cannot have diplomacy. We cannot have de-escalation talks. They are not people who have de-escalation talks. Their way of resolving problems is by hanging people from cranes in Mashhad in the square.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:50 p.m.

Bloc

Andréanne Larouche Bloc Shefford, QC

Madam Chair, my colleague talks a lot about this coming war and their support for it. However, one of the aspects my leader mentioned in his speech earlier is the impact this conflict would have here, such as inflation, when the economic situation is already unstable.

Is my colleague aware that this conflict is escalating? Earlier, I attended a meeting with farmers who fear this conflict will continue to escalate and who are particularly concerned about the inflation it could cause here.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:50 p.m.

Conservative

Costas Menegakis Conservative Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Madam Chair, it is hard to put a dollar sign on this, monetize this, or speak in financial or economic terms when talking about people's lives.

I will share with my hon. colleague the following story of a constituent of mine in Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill who came to me and told me their first cousin was taken from his bed, in his bedroom where he was with his parents. The young man was taken from there. He disappeared for three days, only for the family to be informed three days later to go pick up his body at a specific corner on two streets in Tehran. When they went to find the person, their loved one, he still had a pulse, but he was near death with a note on him that said, “If you dare take him to the hospital or dare call a doctor, we will not only kill him, but we will kill all of you as well.”

I find it very difficult to sit here and talk about what will perhaps have an economic effect on Canada and, at the same time, say it does not matter what happens to people living in Iran because they are living there and we are living here. That is not human. I cannot participate in a discussion at that level.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:50 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Madam Chair, no one on the Conservative side seems to want to answer my question. However, it seems like a valid question to me.

It has to do with support for a military offensive launched by Donald Trump, who said that following this offensive, he would choose the next regime in Iran, because the United States was going to win this war. That is what Donald Trump said.

However, anyone who blindly and unconditionally supports the American and Israeli offensive is also supporting Donald Trump's desire to choose the next regime. I sincerely and firmly believe that it is up to Iranians to choose the next political regime.

Is this not something the Conservatives should consider and factor into their position? I say this in all sincerity and friendship. Is this not a way for them to distinguish themselves based on their current position?

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:50 p.m.

Conservative

Costas Menegakis Conservative Aurora—Oak Ridges—Richmond Hill, ON

Madam Chair, the brutality of the Iranian regime knows no bounds. The country will never return to the people of Iran until the regime is overthrown. A democratic government must be chosen by the Iranian people, and today that is not possible without intervention—

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Deputy Chair Liberal Alexandra Mendes

We are way over time.

Resuming debate, the hon. member for Lac-Saint-Jean.

Iran and the Middle EastGovernment Orders

8:50 p.m.

Bloc

Alexis Brunelle-Duceppe Bloc Lac-Saint-Jean, QC

Madam Chair, I want to start by saying that I will be sharing my time with the member for Saint‑Hyacinthe—Bagot—Acton.

I want to go back to what was just said. Let us remember that, in 1953, there was a gentleman in Iran, Prime Minister Mossadegh, who was overthrown so that the shah of Iran could take his place. This was done by the British and the Americans. However, what people often forget is that Canada provided logistical and diplomatic support for the overthrow of Mr. Mossadegh, who wanted to nationalize oil resources. Members must remember that it is always a little dangerous to change one regime by imposing a new one on the people.

I want to come back to the Liberals' position on the debate we are having tonight. This is the first time the Prime Minister has faced an international crisis of this magnitude. Unfortunately, he failed rather embarrassingly in his first response when he gave his unreserved and, once again, blind support to Donald Trump's and Israel's military offensive. Sadly, he made that statement without first consulting our allies. It is not okay to blindly support such an offensive. It is not okay to fail to consult key allies before making such a statement. It is not okay to not have a consular contingency plan in place before a conflict erupts. All of Canada's allies had already prepared contingency plans. The writing was on the wall. The Americans have been sending ships to the Persian Gulf for weeks. Several of our allies already had a plan to repatriate people in case a conflict broke out. Unfortunately, Canada did not have one, which explains why it is so difficult for Canadians and Quebeckers who are stuck there to return as quickly as French, German or Romanian citizens. The Romanians have deployed consular services that are much more effective and faster than Canada's.

It is not okay that no measures have been announced to deal with the consequences this conflict will have on our constituents. It is extremely distressing to see the results we are facing and the way this government is managing the situation. They call this their new government, and this is their first major international crisis. That is the Liberals.

It is no different on the Conservative side. I just talked about that. They support the Americans. They were even proud of the Prime Minister's first statement. They have said so. The Leader of the Opposition told us earlier that he was proud of the Prime Minister when that statement was made. I sometimes wonder whether this Prime Minister is a Conservative dressed in red and vice versa. In short, for one day, everyone was on the same page, Conservatives and Liberals alike. However, it is not right to support someone like Donald Trump, who has clearly stated publicly that once the conflict is over, he plans to choose the next regime or the next leader in Iran, in Tehran. It is just wrong to take such a position. I invite all parties to think more carefully when dealing with an issue as complex as the one we are discussing this evening.

It is also not okay for the NDP to hold a press conference in the foyer of the House to call for an emergency debate and then not participate in the debate. I see the Prime Minister nodding his head and seemingly agreeing with me. As I said, the NDP is not currently participating in the debate, even though it held a press conference calling for an emergency debate on this issue.

All this is to say that none of the positions heard today in the House are worthy of a G7 country, yet all of the parties here, except ours, aspire to govern Canada. I believe that, from the outset, we have been in the best position to see what should have been done. I hope my colleagues are taking note.

First, the government should have consulted our allies. Second, it should have prepared a contingency plan for consular services before the conflict erupted. Finally, it should have taken steps to deal with the consequences unfolding here at home.