Mr. Speaker, I want to continue this discussion in the House, a very important discussion for all of Canada, in particular for people living in rural communities. What we are talking about is the Liberal government's changes in budget 2025, which unfairly exclude career college students from federal grants.
This obviously undermines affordability and Canada's workforce needs. It also undermines skills training, which everybody in the House is talking about every day, and which we are going to need if we are going to build the housing and the infrastructure that our country needs imminently.
What this policy does is create two classes of students, based solely on where they actually study. It should not be up to us in the House to decide who gives a better education or what education anybody should have in the first place. I know that when my kids decided to go to school, I wanted them to be able to decide for themselves where they were going. As an institution, we are really promoting all types of education so that we have well-rounded communities in Canada.
With this policy, students are penalized for choosing hands-on, employment-based education. It is agreed on this side of the House, and I am sure that everybody in the House actually agrees with this, that many of the programs that are essential to moving forward as an autonomous country are only offered in career colleges. Public colleges are great, obviously. We have some of the best institutions in the world, but when people live in smaller communities, rural communities, such as Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay, public colleges and universities are quite a drive away and not accessible to everyone. They do not offer some of the very important programs that are needed.
I will give an example: dentistry or dental hygienists. Right now, I would like to go see the dentist myself and go see the hygienist, but it is a six- to eight-month wait in all of the dentists' offices in and around where I live. If we go to even more rural communities in Similkameen—South Okanagan—West Kootenay, it will be an even longer wait. That is just one example of what is happening.
Career colleges play a key role in rapid workforce training. Cutting grants for this particular segment of people who want to be able to further their education would obviously discourage enrolment, reduce the number of graduates and worsen the workforce gaps that we talk about every day in the House.
As for affordability, many students rely on these grants to afford career college programs. Many people understand that this is not a choice between going to a public school and going to a career college. It is not a choice. Many people do not have transportation, particularly in rural communities. We do not have a SkyTrain that we can take to a bigger city like Kelowna. We do not have mass transit. Sometimes the career college that happens to be down the street from one's house or nearby is really the only opportunity people have to further their education and then be able to put food on the table for their family. This is not a fun choice. This limits upward mobility and access to opportunity. I discourage this policy.