The House is on summer break, scheduled to return Sept. 15
House of Commons photo

Crucial Fact

  • His favourite word was cultural.

Last in Parliament April 1997, as Liberal MP for Laval West (Québec)

Won his last election, in 1993, with 46% of the vote.

Statements in the House

Average Income Of Francophones March 24th, 1994

Mr. Speaker, we are of course looking at these figures with great interest. As a francophone myself, I care a great deal about my economic future.

I think we should not jump to conclusions too quickly. Language is one thing, and the economic status of individuals is another, although the two can sometimes be linked. Many factors come into play in determining our economic conditions.

The main thing we can do, in my opinion, is to continue to monitor the situation, gather data and eventually draw conclusions which will be well-informed.

Parks Canada March 24th, 1994

Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 32(2), I have the honour to present to the House, in both official languages, the report entitled "Guiding Principles and Operational Policies for Parks Canada".

Following the tabling of this document, I will make a ministerial statement to inform members of this House of the government's vision regarding the future of national parks and historic sites, as well as the promotion and development of our identity and national heritage.

Madam Speaker, this is a special day for all Canadians. With the tabling of the Parks Canada "Guiding Principles and Operating Policies", yet another step is taken in entrenching and securing the national heritage of Canada.

It is a rare day in any democracy when a minister can table principles and policies for a nation in the full knowledge that two other colleagues now sitting on the side opposite have participated in their formulation.

I would like to acknowledge the roles played by the Leader of the Opposition, the hon. member for Lac-Saint-Jean, and the hon. member for Sherbrooke, now the leader of the Progressive Conservative Party. To have such a consensus regarding a policy is a rare occurrence indeed.

As Canadians, we value our freedom, our clean environment, the beauty and natural wilderness and the paths of human endeavour which have brought us to where we are today. The sense of wonder and reverence we feel as we learn about past human activities that have laid the foundation of our country stimulate a profound concern for ensuring the survival of historic places, artefacts and structures.

Despite pressures on our environment and on our heritage resources Canadians should be assured that our national parks and national historic sites will be protected and well managed for future generations to enjoy. Our national parks and national historic sites will not be worn down or worn out through overuse or neglect.

Of course since the last policy statement in 1979 there has been a greater sense of urgency in the Canadian public on environmental, ecological and heritage matters. There has been a swell of public sentiment nationally and internationally creat-

ing an expectation of leadership in the care of the environment and preservation of natural and cultural heritage.

According to recent surveys, 90 per cent of Canadians want to have more information about our country's history. The national historic sites and related heritage programs go a long way toward filling this knowledge gap.

Each year, one-third of Canadians travel to participate in heritage activities across the country. Canada's national parks and national historic sites are cornerstones of our domestic and international tourism industry. More than 30,000 jobs are associated with Canada's national parks and historic sites. They make a contribution to our national economy in excess of one billion dollars per year.

Parks Canada, through its application of the principles and policies, will maintain the integrity of natural and cultural heritage, while ensuring that parks and sites continue to play a major role in the local, regional and national economy. It will do this by ensuring that the management decisions affecting these special places are made on sound and scientifically based knowledge.

The programs administered by Parks Canada will continue to have positive impacts on local communities. They will create jobs and assist sustainable land use and ecotourism.

Highlights of the new Parks Canada policy include:

First, an update of the Parks Canada mandate to include its responsibilities for national parks, national historic sites, historic canals, heritage railway stations, Canada's heritage rivers, marine conservation areas and federal heritage buildings;

Second, guiding principles stressing that natural and historic qualities will be maintained, that Canadians will be involved and consulted, and that an orderly framework is provided for the addition of new heritage areas; and

Third, a renewed emphasis placed upon partnership and co-operation with other levels of government, communities and the private sector.

This does not mean shifting the responsibility for preserving and creating Canada's heritage to others. Our history, traditions, and the environment require partnerships for implementation of successful heritage programs and, ultimately, a stronger leadership role for Parks Canada, nationally and internationally, that will demonstrate and advocate environmental and heritage ethics and practices.

National parks and national historic sites are symbols of the Canadian identity and make all Canadians proud. In fact, I am making this speech in what is designated as one of Canada's national historic sites. And next to the Parliament buildings is one of the ends of the Rideau Canal, one of Canada's heritage waterways, administered by Parks Canada and subject to these new policies.

On that positive note I conclude my remarks on the Parks Canada guiding principles and operating policies.

Publishing Industry March 23rd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I realize the hon. member has trouble following me, because since I became responsible for Amateur Sport, I have learned how to do some pretty fancy footwork.

I do not appreciate words being put into my mouth. What I said is that, to my knowledge, no firm and specific offers had been made for Ginn. That is what I said.

Publishing Industry March 23rd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I am not sure whether the applause is in anticipation of my answer. I never changed my mind, and I never changed my position. The comments I allegedly made outside the House referred to the period which followed the transaction, not to the period prior to the transaction. Anyone who has followed this debate will understand what I mean.

La Francophonie March 22nd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to say that we have managed to spare communities such as the one he just mentioned from existing cuts in my department.

Publishing Industry March 22nd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I am very happy to know that the lawyers in question are Canadians but I believe that they serve an American master.

As for the legal opinion, I am pleased to be asked this question in this House after being asked the same question outside the House, as this opinion contains quotations from Cabinet documents which, according to the settlement negotiated between a previous government and this one, cannot be presented in this House. I abide by this rule.

Publishing Industry March 22nd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I am surprised to discover that our colleague's advisors are Americans. Mine are Canadians and I believe what they tell me.

Publishing Industry March 22nd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I am not the manager of the CDIC. I do not have the financial skills to take on that job. Moreover, I do not think it is up to the Minister of Heritage to start doing some advertising outside his field.

My area of responsibility is Canadian cultural policy. Regarding this matter, I have stated clearly on several occasions that I consider Ginn to be an exception. While admittedly this may not have been a particularly fortunate transaction, the policy itself is sound. It calls for supporting and protecting the Canadian cultural industry, including the publishing industry.

Publishing Industry March 22nd, 1994

Mr. Speaker, yesterday we were fortunate to have a few documents tabled. They clearly indicated that certain Canadian publishers were interested in buying Ginn. However, I did not see a specific purchase offer in these documents.

We are not so much concerned about events which took place nearly 10 years ago as we are about what has happened since this government took office. And I have seen no direct offer to purchase Ginn since this government has been at the helm.

Publishing Industry March 21st, 1994

Mr. Speaker, I find it interesting that this subject is generating so much interest. There is always the possibility of putting questions before the standing parliamentary committees. We see no good reason for putting a lot of effort and work into an investigation, the effect of which would be to honour previous government ministers who are politically dead, thank God.