Refine by MP, party, committee, province, or result type.

Results 105676-105690 of 105812
Sorted by relevance | Sort by date: newest first / oldest first

Defence Policy  How can we say that, on one hand, we are cutting spending by the Department of National Defence and that, on the other hand, we are keeping military bases which should no longer be in use open for peacekeeper training. This contradictory message deserves to be challenged by the Bloc Quebecois. Fourth, Quebec's military bases, Valcartier in particular, play a very important role in preparing Canadian troops for international peacekeeping missions.

February 17th, 1994House debate

Jean-Marc JacobBloc

Business Of Supply  Creative new funding opportunities must include the third sector contribution, charitable organizations and all those involved in the area of meeting the housing needs of Canadians. Housing policy can no longer be considered as something by itself isolated in a vacuum, the responsibility of a government agency, body or ministry. It cannot simply be measured in terms of public expenditures. It must be linked to other public policies and co-ordinated with them to get the most from available resources.

February 16th, 1994House debate

Jean AugustineLiberal

Business Of Supply  It is astounding to me that the incidence of family violence continues to increase. I look forward to the day when we no longer need to build and maintain shelters for women and their children fleeing domestic violence. For now we need to address this critical issue in the best way we can. We will continue to provide funding for shelters and other housing commitments under the family violence initiative.

February 16th, 1994House debate

David DingwallLiberal

Cfb Moose Jaw  Beyond that the member and the other members of the House will just have to wait a little bit longer until we make our statement.

February 16th, 1994House debate

David CollenetteLiberal

Prince Edward Island Fixed Link  We do not want it lowering our credit rating, increasing the cost of borrowing all these dollars that we need if governments are going to continue funding megaprojects when we are past the half-trillion dollar bench mark. I do not want to carry on too much longer in sort of a gloom and doom approach. I do not think it is time to be down on ourselves but I do believe it is time to make wise decisions as Canadians. As Reformers we talked to Canadians and said that we feel governments have to cut spending and one area is megaprojects.

February 15th, 1994House debate

Elwin HermansonReform

Prince Edward Island Fixed Link  Madam Speaker, I have not done any studies but I am aware that water transportation is much cheaper for much longer distances. However I would say that anyone who has waited for a ferry as opposed to crossing a bridge knows one is a great deal easier and more efficient than the other. We heard personal accounts from some hon. members who have had to wait for ferries.

February 15th, 1994House debate

John EnglishLiberal

Prince Edward Island Fixed Link  The fishermen have another real concern: if the bridge delays the ice moving out of the strait it would have an impact on the lobster fishery in terms of the waters remaining cooler and the lobsters therefore remaining dormant for a longer period of time. It would have an impact on lobsters. Studies have clearly shown that the ice delay would be very limited and would have minimal effect, if any, on the lobster fishery.

February 15th, 1994House debate

Wayne EasterLiberal

Prince Edward Island Fixed Link  We believe a link will change that. When we look at the truckers, the fuel they are burning, the hours, taking a day longer to get to market in terms of scheduling and so on, it is a disaster for them and for the agricultural industry as well. What does the hon. member mean by first class ferry service? I hope this is not an example.

February 15th, 1994House debate

Wayne EasterLiberal

Prince Edward Island Fixed Link  Is the hon. member saying to Canada's smallest province, to that group of individuals, that they no longer have that right as other Canadians in British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba and across this country have that right? Is the hon. member suggesting in a code that because one comes from a small province, because one comes from a small population base, one does not enjoy the rights that other provinces have?

February 15th, 1994House debate

David DingwallLiberal

Prince Edward Island Fixed Link  I would like to add that, if this is good for Prince Edward Island-and it is-and if the federal government is able to make financial commitments that I would describe as reasonable to ensure substantial economic development in Prince Edward Island for the 125,000 residents of the island, one can wonder why the federal government no longer conducts this kind of projects which in the past have prompted massively enthusiastic responses in terms of economic development. I am thinking of the HST, the high speed train, in particular.

February 15th, 1994House debate

Lucien BouchardBloc

Criminal Code  It would be quite unfair if the guard decides there is a person who would pose a problem, who may cause bodily harm, and he decides he can fire at that person who is escaping and then finds out that that person was released during the day and is no longer in the jail. All of a sudden the provision does not apply to him. It could be just as unfair the other way. If the intent of that subsection is to allow a peace officer to cause death or grievous bodily harm through an escaping inmate when no other reasonable means that are less violent are possible then it should be said in that clause rather than having the cumbersome procedure that is available.

February 14th, 1994House debate

Morris BodnarLiberal

Criminal Code  For the owners of these vessels, profit comes first and conservation is never considered. They simply do not care. The Government of Canada will no longer stand by and watch this happen. These vessels will not be allowed to take the last of the breeding stock of cod or flounder before moving on to overfish somewhere else in the world. For too long these vessels have hidden behind obscure technicalities in international law.

February 14th, 1994House debate

Herb DhaliwalLiberal

Criminal Code  To those who protested that this amounted to a so called execution before trial, the answer could be well made that the fleeing suspect could not have been terribly interested in his trial or he would not have fled in the first place. In any event this rationale for the rule no longer exists in civilized societies where no crimes are punishable by death in Canada. It is said that the bulk of academic and law enforcement opinion is that the deadly force justification found in subsection 25(4) is quite simply too broad.

February 14th, 1994House debate

Paul ForsethReform

Criminal Code  After all the twists and turns we have been through, scientists now tell us that seals are only one predator among many. Since the scapegoat is no longer there, another one must be found! What better than foreigners? Let us gladly hide the real problems behind the wicked foreigners. In the meantime, we do not talk about what will happen to the fishing industry after May 16.

February 14th, 1994House debate

Yvan BernierBloc

Criminal Code  May I observe, as I introduce debate at second reading, that this bill will maintain and reaffirm the ability of peace officers to protect themselves and the public from serious harm or death; will clarify when peace officers can use deadly force to stop suspects who are fleeing arrest, or inmates attempting to escape from penitentiaries; will justify a police response to the threat posed by a fleeing suspect that is in proportion to the seriousness of that threat; and, will modernize the law by updating an archaic provision of the code that is inadequate and no longer fits the reality of present day Canada. The bill provides that force that is intended or is likely to cause death or grievous bodily harm to arrest a fleeing suspect may only be used when reasonably necessary for the protection of any person from imminent or future death or grievous bodily harm, and only if the flight cannot be prevented by reasonable means in a less violent manner.

February 14th, 1994House debate

Allan RockLiberal