Finance committee  I think that's a fair assessment about not being necessary. The authorities set out in clause 302 before the amendment do not preclude a review process that could be set out at the time of regulatory development.

Finance committee  The authority in the clause is an enabling authority that is broad enough in scope that a review process could be put in place at the time when the administrative monetary penalty scheme is put in place in regulations.

Finance committee  It's not for me to say.

Finance committee  Again, it's not for me to say.

Finance committee  Absolutely. The details of those penalties are set out in the regulatory scheme.

Finance committee  We don't call them fines. They're administrative penalties.

Finance committee  Fines would be in a criminal proceeding.

Finance committee  There's a distinction there.

Finance committee  The range would be set out when regulations are developed.

Finance committee  They haven't been set out yet.

Finance committee  Administrative monetary penalties. There are a number of different regimes that the federal government has in place under different pieces of legislation for monetary penalties. Some of those will be a guide to what the amounts will be, but it's difficult to say at this point in

Finance committee  The regulations now stipulate that any employer found non-compliant gets published on the list, gets posted publicly.

Finance committee  And the amount, that will be set out at the time when regulations are developed, but it will be the employer's name, the reason they're non-compliant. It would be posted on the Web, similar to the same compliance regime we have now. We'll just build on that.

Finance committee  It could be determined, but it could be.

Finance committee  Yes.