Debates of Oct. 9th, 2009
House of Commons Hansard #94 of the 40th Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was autism.
Topics
- Question Period
- Canada Post Corporation Act
- Bear Ball Hockey Tournament
- World Hospice and Palliative Care Day
- Help Line for Immigrant Women
- Afghanistan
- Champions of Mental Health Awards
- National Co-op Week
- Sergeant-at-Arms
- Bloc Québécois Plan
- Local Food Day
- Brazil
- Truth in Sentencing Legislation
- Tax Harmonization
- Liberal Party of Canada
- 2009 Nobel Peace Prize
- Mental Health
- Taxation
- Government Advertising
- Employment Insurance
- Tax Harmonization
- Afghanistan
- The Environment
- Agriculture and Agri-food
- Federal Appointments
- Pensions
- The Environment
- Nortel
- Biotechnology
- Canadian Heritage
- Federal Appointments
- Employment Insurance
- Canadian Heritage
- Post-secondary Education
- Canadian Heritage
- Justice
- Official Languages
- Museums
- Health
- National DNA Data Bank of Canada
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police
- Electronic Surveillance
- Committees of the House
- Foreign Affairs
- Government Response to Petitions
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
- Committees of the House
- Petitions
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Points of Order
- Canada-Colombia Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
- World Autism Awareness Day Act
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Question No. 279
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
Liberal
Judy Sgro York West, ON
With respect to the Veterans Affairs program for the compensation of those who were exposed to Agent Orange: (a) how did the government come to the decision on the years that would be covered for those who were exposed; (b) how did the government arrive at the compensation amount of $20,000; (c) why will the government not compensate the widows of those who were exposed and met the qualifying conditions, but who have since passed away; (d) how many applications for compensation has the government received to date; (e) how many of those applications have been approved; (f) how many applications have been denied; (g) how many of those denied were refused because the veteran has since passed away; (h) how many of the applications denied were due to a medical condition that was not deemed to meet the government’s criteria; (i) what mechanisms did the government use to determine which illnesses would be covered and which would not be considered for compensation; (j) how many cheques have been issued and delivered; and (k) was the departmental funding cut of $33.6 million completely due to a program criteria which resulted in lower than expected numbers of beneficiaries?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 317
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
NDP
Carol Hughes Algoma—Manitoulin—Kapuskasing, ON
With regards to the performance of the access to information system in the government for fiscal years 2005-2006 to 2008-2009, for each department and agency subject to the Access to information Act: (a) what was the number of requests received; (b) what was the number of requests answered within the 30 day time limit; (c) what was the number of requests answered within 60 days; (d) what was the number of requests answered within 90 days; (e) what was the number of requests answered within 120 days or more; (f) what is the number that were appealed to the Information Commissioner; (g) what is the number of deemed refusal complaints found by the Commissioner; (h) what is the number of request that have been referred to the courts; (i) what is the number of requests that have been ordered to be released by a court; and (j) what is the amount spent on administration of the Act?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 327
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
Liberal
Dominic LeBlanc Beauséjour, NB
With respect to Dorchester Penitentiary: (a) how many plans are there for renovating or completely rebuilding it; (b) what are the operating costs associated with each of these plans; and (c) is the government currently implementing any of these plans and, if not, why not?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 403
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
Liberal
Andrew Kania Brampton West, ON
With respect to federal infrastructure spending in the constituency of Brampton West, what was the total amount of government funding since fiscal year 2005-2006 up to and including the current fiscal year, itemized according to: (a) the date the money was requested in the riding; (b) the dollar amount requested; (c) the dollar amount received; (d) the program from which the funding came; (e) the department responsible; and (f) the designated recipient?
(Return tabled)
Question No. 405
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
Liberal
Andrew Kania Brampton West, ON
With respect to applications to sponsor family members for visitor’s visas and permanent residency, made by residents of the constituency of Brampton West: (a) what is the average processing time for applications made to sponsor family members from (i) India, (ii) Pakistan, (iii) all countries aggregated; (b) what is the approval rate for applications made to sponsor family member from (i) India, (ii) Pakistan, (iii) all countries aggregated; (c) what are the top five main grounds for denying claims and their rates of usage for applications made to sponsor family members from (i) India, (ii) Pakistan, (iii) all countries aggregated; and (d) what are the details of all refusals with the dates, names and reasons?
(Return tabled)
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
Conservative
Tom Lukiwski Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK
Madam Speaker, I ask that all remaining questions be allowed to stand.
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
NDP
Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
Routine Proceedings
12:20 p.m.
Some hon. members
Agreed.
Oral Questions
Points of Order
Routine Proceedings
October 9th, 2009 / 12:20 p.m.
Liberal
Gerard Kennedy Parkdale—High Park, ON
Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order in reference to a question I asked on October 1. Upon my review of Hansard, I used the word “deliberately”. On advice that it may be unparliamentary, I wish to withdraw the use of that word in reference to the Conservative efforts to cover up the failure of the job creation program.
I was not aware I used the word “deliberately” that day but after reviewing Hansard, I see it is there. I would like to withdraw it to ensure it is not in contravention of parliamentary standards.
