Debates of June 17th, 2010
House of Commons Hansard #65 of the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament's site.) The word of the day was prorogation.
Topics
- Question Period
- Commissioner of Lobbying
- Air India
- Government Response to Petitions
- Strengthening Aviation Security Act
- Royal Canadian Mounted Police Modernization Act
- Interparliamentary Delegations
- Committees of the House
- National Housing Act
- Forgiveness of Student Loans for Health Professionals Act
- Investment Canada Act
- Canada Elections Act
- Protecting Canadians Abroad Act
- Immigration and Refugee Protection Act
- Criminal Code
- Canadian Human Rights Act
- Cell Phone Freedom Act
- Fisheries Act
- Business of Supply
- Committees of the House
- Iran
- Petitions
- Questions on the Order Paper
- Questions Passed as Orders for Returns
- Business of Supply
- The Environment
- Robert Bruce Salter
- Ginette Lamoureux
- Stewart Memorial Church
- Justice Legislation
- Cupids 400
- Retirement Wishes
- Maureen Forrester
- Agriculture
- Public Safety
- Bloc Québécois
- Bombing of Air India Flight 182
- The Economy
- Education for All
- Robert Middlemiss
- Firearms Registry
- Air India
- G8 and G20 Summits
- Quebec Nation
- Securities
- Forestry Industry
- Air India
- G8 Summit
- International Co-operation
- Agriculture
- The Environment
- Quebec Nation
- Copyright
- Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
- Sydney Harbour
- Justice
- Tax-Free Savings Accounts
- Poverty
- Firearms Registry
- Young Offenders
- Lighthouses
- G8 and G20 Summits
- Jazz Air
- Foreign Affairs
- Job Creation
- Business of the House
- Bill C-23--Instruction to the Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security
- Celebrating Canada's Seniors Act
- Points of Order
- Privilege
- Points of Order
- Committees of the House
- Business of Supply
- MAIN ESTIMATES, 2010-11
- Business of Supply
- Main Estimates, 2010-11
- Supplementary Estimates (A), 2010-11
- Business of the House
Agriculture
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Battlefords—Lloydminster
Saskatchewan
Conservative
Gerry Ritz Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
Mr. Speaker, I am happy to report that I have working in close contact with industry in Saskatchewan as well as the minister of agriculture in Saskatchewan, Bob Bjornerud. We have putting our numbers together. We have been doing our assessments. We have extended the time frame on crop insurance. I know the crop reports that come on June 25 will be very helpful in moving forward.
Agriculture
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Liberal
Wayne Easter Malpeque, PE
Mr. Speaker, just like the Minister of Agriculture fails farmers, the Minister of Transport fails them even worse. He allows the railways to gouge farmers with excessive freight rates. A study released yesterday shows farmers are overcharged by the railways on an average $200 million per year. That is $17,000 to $32,000 per farm, ripped off by the railways, condoned by the minister.
Why no costing review and why does the Minister of Transport allow the railways to gouge farmers?
Agriculture
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Battlefords—Lloydminster
Saskatchewan
Conservative
Gerry Ritz Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food and Minister for the Canadian Wheat Board
Mr. Speaker, the only thing more hypocritical than the member for Malpeque standing on this issue is the Wheat Board buying into this crazy logic. Certainly farmers are involved when it comes to transportation. They rely on the Wheat Board to set the best price for them. The Wheat Board constantly brags it is doing that, now it is crying that it is not able to do it. Someone has the figures wrong.
We are not hearing any concerns from canola and pulse growers, we are hearing concerns from Wheat Board growers because they cannot value add. They are forced to do buybacks, which costs them far more than this supposed increase in freight.
I know the minister from Alberta in charge of transport is doing a great job on this review and it will be good news for farmers.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Bloc
Bernard Bigras Rosemont—La Petite-Patrie, QC
Mr. Speaker, the issue of fighting climate change illustrates the Conservatives' bias in favour of Canadian oil companies to the detriment of Quebec's green economy. By refusing to implement an effective plan to fight greenhouse gas emissions, the federal government is protecting the oil sands but damaging Quebec's economy, which would benefit from having a carbon exchange in Montreal.
When will the Conservative government realize how much harm it is causing to Quebec and its economy by refusing to address climate change?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:35 p.m.
Calgary Centre-North
Alberta
Conservative
Jim Prentice Minister of the Environment
Mr. Speaker, the opposition is attacking the government while respected international organizations are applauding our efforts. For instance, the March 2010 Pew report ranked Canada sixth for investment in green energy. In April 2010, the International Energy Agency congratulated Canada on its commitment to increase its clean electricity production. Yesterday, the same agency recognized the major efforts Canada is making to develop carbon storage.
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Bloc
Paule Brunelle Trois-Rivières, QC
Mr. Speaker, the federal government has signed an agreement with Newfoundland and Nova Scotia regarding mining the seabed in the Gulf of St. Lawrence. The Government of Quebec has been calling for a similar agreement for 12 years. The government's stubbornness is preventing Quebec from making decisions under its own environmental assessment system, which is one of the best in the world.
Why is the government refusing to give Quebec the same advantages it is giving to Newfoundland and Nova Scotia?
The Environment
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Cypress Hills—Grasslands
Saskatchewan
Conservative
David Anderson Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Natural Resources and for the Canadian Wheat Board
Mr. Speaker, Quebec is continuing its evaluation of the opportunity presented by the hydrocarbon potential in the Gulf of St. Lawrence and adjacent onshore. The federal government is ready to work with the province of Quebec as we are with provinces all across the country to ensure the responsible and sustainable development of our natural resources across Canada.
Quebec Nation
Oral Questions
June 17th, 2010 / 2:40 p.m.
Bloc
Pierre Paquette Joliette, QC
Mr. Speaker, this House recognized the Quebec nation but stubbornly refuses to give expression to that recognition. To strengthen its identity and protect its national culture, the needs of Quebec include having Bill 101 apply to enterprises under federal jurisdiction, a telecommunications and broadcasting commission of its own and an exemption from the multiculturalism act.
Is the refusal of the Canadian parties to adopt our bills on these matters not proof that Canadian nation building is done at the expense of Quebec?
Quebec Nation
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam
B.C.
Conservative
James Moore Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages
Mr. Speaker, we have a good understanding of the Bloc Québécois' policies. It is just not in the interest of Quebeckers or Canada. Our government has programs, investments and laws that protect the identity of Quebeckers and also the national unity of Canada.
Copyright
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Bloc
Carole Lavallée Saint-Bruno—Saint-Hubert, QC
Mr. Speaker, groups of Quebec's artists, creators, authors, publishers and even consumers are opposed to Bill C-32 on copyright because the bill ignores the consensus of the Quebec cultural community concerning the remuneration of artists through levies on digital audio recorders and through making Internet service providers more accountable.
Will the Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages admit that everyone in Quebec is opposed to his copyright vision, which benefits neither creators nor consumers?
Copyright
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Port Moody—Westwood—Port Coquitlam
B.C.
Conservative
James Moore Minister of Canadian Heritage and Official Languages
Mr. Speaker, the only thing the Bloc Québécois has proposed in this regard is a massive new tax directed at consumers, which would also affect artists. This is what the president of the Canadian Recording Industry Association had to say, “I do not think that is the solution. I do not think the artists will benefit. ...No one will benefit.”
Here is what Loreena McKennitt, who is a Juno Award winning songwriter, said, “I too would oppose the itax. I would rather have a strict and predictable business model in which I can conduct my business as an artist”.
That is what they need. They do not need an itax from the Bloc Québécois.
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Brian Murphy Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB
Mr. Speaker, yesterday, in the House, the ACOA minister attacked the credibility of the member for New Brunswick Southwest. However, the member took it one step further that evening, confirming the very damaging discussions he had had with the Prime Minister.
When will this government stop trying to interfere in New Brunswick's provincial politics? And when will the Prime Minister reprimand the ACOA minister?
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Fredericton
New Brunswick
Conservative
Keith Ashfield Minister of National Revenue
Mr. Speaker, fairness and equity, not politics, are the basis for all funding announcements as part of Canada's economic action plan in New Brunswick and in all of Canada.
The member opposite talks about funding. His riding alone, under RInC and CAF, recreational infrastructure and the community adjustments fund, received $7 million worth of federal funding in projects, with no input from him.
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Oral Questions
2:40 p.m.
Liberal
Brian Murphy Moncton—Riverview—Dieppe, NB
Mr. Speaker, the mayor of Moncton was here yesterday. He was asking for a lot more.
There are allegations of the transport minister meddling in the Ottawa mayor's race. We had the Conservatives breaking election rules in the in and out scandal. Now the Prime Minister is withholding building Canada funding in New Brunswick Southwest until his former director of communications, John Williamson, has the riding nomination and can take credit on his own.
What is wrong with the member for New Brunswick Southwest? Will the prime minister of prorogation admit and confirm that funding for the St. George civic project, which the member for New Brunswick Southwest wanted, will be confirmed and will be paid?
Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency
Oral Questions
2:45 p.m.
Ottawa West—Nepean
Ontario
Conservative
John Baird Minister of Transport
Mr. Speaker, we have had a great relationship with this New Brunswick government, with the previous New Brunswick government. We have concluded literally dozens and dozens of projects, creating a lot of jobs in every corner of New Brunswick.
We have been incredibly fair and incredibly decent. In fact, the project that the hon. member speaks of was one of the ones we considered last year, when the member for New Brunswick Southwest was the political minister, and regrettably we chose to fund other projects.
