Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1 (Targeted Tax Relief)

An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (temporary enhancement to the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax credit)

This bill is from the 44th Parliament, 1st session, which ended in January 2025.

Sponsor

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is now law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment amends the Income Tax Act in order to double the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) credit for six months, effectively increasing the maximum annual GST/HST credit amounts by 50% for the 2022-2023 benefit year.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-30s:

C-30 (2021) Law Budget Implementation Act, 2021, No. 1
C-30 (2016) Law Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement Implementation Act
C-30 (2014) Law Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act
C-30 (2012) Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act

Votes

Oct. 6, 2022 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-30, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (temporary enhancement to the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax credit)

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-30 proposes amending the Income Tax Act to temporarily double the Goods and Services Tax (GST) credit for six months, aiming to provide financial relief to low-income individuals and families. The increased credit would be delivered as a lump-sum payment through the existing GST system. Concerns have been raised regarding its limited scope and effectiveness in addressing the broader structural issues contributing to the rising cost of living, including inflation, housing affordability, and supply chain challenges.

Liberal

  • Supports GST credit increase: The Liberal party supports Bill C-30, which would double the GST credit for six months to provide targeted support to Canadians struggling with the rising cost of living. This measure aims to provide additional disposable income to help Canadians deal with inflation.
  • Investing in middle class: The party emphasizes its commitment to supporting Canada's middle class and those aspiring to join it, viewing a healthy middle class as essential for a healthy economy. They believe in providing necessary supports to build a stronger middle class and improve the quality of life for Canadians.
  • Criticizes Conservative economic policies: The Liberal party criticizes the Conservative Party's economic policies, particularly their stance on the carbon tax and CPP contributions, accusing them of flip-flopping and prioritizing tax cuts for the wealthy over support for vulnerable Canadians. They contrast their targeted support measures with what they see as the Conservatives' detrimental approach.
  • Supports dental care benefit: Liberals support the Canada Dental Benefit, emphasizing the importance of providing dental care to vulnerable children. They express concern over the NDP's proposal for a fully federally administered program, suggesting that provinces and territories are better suited for delivery.

Conservative

  • Supports immediate relief: The Conservatives support the GST rebate as a form of immediate relief for Canadians struggling with the rising cost of living, but they also believe the government is not addressing the underlying structural issues of the Canadian economy.
  • Criticizes government spending: The Conservatives argue that the government's overspending and inflationary policies have led to the current affordability crisis. They criticize the government's approach of borrowing money to provide relief, stating that it will only exacerbate inflation.
  • Proposes alternative solutions: The Conservatives propose alternative solutions such as eliminating the ArriveCAN app and scrapping the Infrastructure Bank to find cost savings and reduce the burden on taxpayers. They also suggest cancelling planned tax hikes and providing tax relief to stimulate the economy.
  • Highlights affordability struggles: Conservative speakers emphasize the struggles of Canadians to afford basic necessities like groceries, gas, and home heating. They share stories of constituents who are cutting back on food, unable to enroll children in activities, and worried about the rising cost of living.

NDP

  • Supports immediate financial relief: The NDP supports Bill C-30 and Bill C-31 as immediate investments in the well-being of people. They are using their power to get the government to send financial support out to people. They view these bills as something that would never have come from the government without the pressure from New Democrats.
  • Need for systemic change: NDP speakers noted that consecutive Liberal and Conservative governments have eroded the social safety net by putting corporations above everyday people. While the NDP is acting on the immediate need, longer term change is needed. Canada needs a fair taxation system that would close corporate loopholes in order to recover the reported $30 billion lost due to corporate tax avoidance.
  • GST rebate welcomed, but insufficient: The NDP has been calling on the government to double the GST credit for over six months. They welcome this move, but state that it is insufficient, and that this rebate should have come a lot sooner. The NDP will always put people first, but the Liberal government needs to start making real investments in people and their well-being in Canada.
  • Corporate greed is the problem: While fossil fuel companies and big corporate grocery chains are bringing in billions of dollars in profits, people are falling further and further behind. Speakers accuse corporations of using inflation as cover to drastically increase their profits and prices, and taking advantage of the current situation. The NDP believes corporations need to pay for their excess profits so that the money can to go to the government and it can use that money productively for Canadians.

Bloc

  • Support for Bill C-30: The Bloc Québécois supports Bill C-30, as it aligns with their earlier budget expectations. They see it as a small but necessary measure to address the current inflationary crisis and provide financial relief to those who need it most.
  • Need for comprehensive solutions: While supporting the bill, the Bloc emphasizes that a one-time GST-HST cheque is not a comprehensive solution to the broader problem of inflation and rising poverty. They advocate for a more strategic and sustainable approach that includes long-term measures to address the root causes of economic instability.
  • Targeted and intelligent measures: The Bloc calls for government intervention and support that is properly targeted, well thought out, and intelligent to avoid negative effects and waste. They suggest using government surpluses to rebuild the economy, insulate it from future crises, and invest in sectors facing challenges like labor shortages.
  • Focus on vulnerable populations: The Bloc Québécois expresses particular concern for seniors and low-income earners, who are disproportionately affected by inflation due to their fixed incomes. They advocate for measures to help seniors meet their basic needs and enable experienced workers to remain in the workforce.

Green

  • Supports the bill: The speaker supports Bill C-30 because Canadians need help, and the GST rebate will reach 11 million Canadians. The speaker also notes support for Bill C-31, which includes a one-time payment to low-income renters and the beginning of dental care coverage.
  • Bill is a band-aid: While supporting the bill, the speaker characterizes it as a "band-aid" solution that does not address larger economic problems or the potential for a recession. The speaker notes that a band-aid is good when one is bleeding, by the way, but it is not a long-term solution.
  • Global problems: The speaker believes both Conservatives and Liberals oversimplify the problems of inflation and cost increases, and that these problems are global in nature. They also highlight the impact of climate change and international crises like the war in Ukraine on the Canadian economy.
  • Need long-term solutions: The speaker believes that instead of short-term fixes, long-term solutions are needed, such as a wealth tax or a windfall tax on oil and gas profits, anticipating a potential recession.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6 p.m.

NDP

Don Davies NDP Vancouver Kingsway, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is always a privilege to rise in the House to speak on behalf of the people of Vancouver Kingsway, to bring their voices to this place, to reflect their experiences and to express how we can, in this House, best support them and their families and the businesses that operate in the wonderful riding that I am fortunate to represent.

Tonight, I rise to speak on Bill C-30, called the cost of living relief act, no. 1. Bill C-30 amends the Income Tax Act to double the goods and services tax or harmonized sales tax credit for six months, effectively increasing the maximum annual GST/HST credit amounts by 50% for the 2022-23 benefit year. What that means is that doubling the GST credit would provide about $2.5 billion in additional targeted support immediately to roughly 11 million individuals and families who already receive the tax credit, including about half of Canadian families with children and more than half of Canadian seniors.

To give an example of the impact of this, single Canadians without children would receive up to an extra $234 and couples with two children up to an extra $467 this year. Seniors would receive an extra $225 on average immediately. I want to stop at this point to say that this is an interim stopgap measure. By no means will this measure adjust or improve the systemic problems of the Canadian economy or address the long-standing inequities that exist along with the poor distribution of wealth in this country. In fact, the distribution of wealth has gotten worse over the decades, as wealth is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands and more and more people struggle. That has been the unmistakable, undeniable trajectory of how wealth and income have been distributed in this country over the last 40 years.

Given the horrible impacts of very unusually high inflation, New Democrats have been pushing for urgent action to address Canada's cost of living crisis for many months. We did not just start this yesterday. We identified this problem and have been advocating, working hard and fighting for Canadians in this place for the last six months.

If the Liberals and Conservatives had supported the NDP's call last May to double the GST credit, which is when we did that in this House, eligible Canadians could have received up to $467 before the start of the summer. This money would already be in Canadians' hands if the two major parties in the House had the same commitment to working people and marginalized Canadians that the NDP has in this country. However, it is the fact that not six months ago both the Liberals and Conservatives voted against the very proposal before the House today to provide this essential relief to Canadians.

New Democrats are now proposing that all parties work together to fast-track Bill C-30 through Parliament to ensure that people receive their increased GST rebate as soon as possible. Last week, Canadians were told by the Conservatives that they will have to wait even longer for relief, because the Conservatives refused to work evenings to get this urgently needed support out the door and, again, opposed the NDP's offer to work on an expeditious basis because we recognize the urgency of the problem today.

New Democrats are delivering real results for Canadians beyond this. The Canadian dental benefit will deliver up to $1,300 to parents with children under 12 who do not have access to dental insurance. The top-up to the Canada housing benefit, again proposed by the NDP in the last election platform will deliver a $500 payment to 1.8 million renters who are struggling so mightily with the cost of housing. This more than doubles the government's original commitment reaching twice as many Canadians as originally promised. Of course, doubling the GST credit will provide $2.5 billion in additional targeted support, again, to some of the poorest and most needy Canadians in our country from coast to coast to coast.

Taken together, the result of these three NDP-driven proposals would mean that a family of two will receive between $3,000 and $4,000 due to NDP advocacy and hard work in this Parliament. That is the result of the NDP working for Canadians.

By way of background, the GST tax credit would help offset the financial impact of the GST for low- and modest-income people and families. That is the whole purpose of it. The credit is paid quarterly, in January, April, July and December, with benefit years beginning in July. The total annual value of this credit depends on family size and income. For the 2022-23 benefit year, eligible people can receive up to $467 for single people without children, $612 for married or common-law couples, $612 for single parents, plus $161 for each child under the age of 19.

I want to pause for a moment, because I have heard people in the House, mainly on the Conservative side, who have scoffed at the amount of money we are talking about here. They have said that this is not enough money, that these are crumbs and that this is an insufficient amount of money. I can tell them that to someone who is trying to live on $20,000 a year or $25,000 a year or $30,000 a year, $500 makes a big difference. I have said it before and I am going to say it again. It is easy for MPs, who make $185,000 a year minimum, to stand in this House, like the Conservatives have done, and tell Canadians that $500 does not mean much to them. That might mean a child's hockey; that might mean a child's school lunches; that might mean clothing for children for a year. That is what $500 means to people who are earning between $20,000 and $40,000 a year, and that is meaningful.

The GST credit is indexed for inflation on an annual basis using CPI index data, but of course, for this year, for the July 2022 to June 2023 benefit year, the value of that GST credit grew by only 2.4%, because it was based on the CPI from 2020 to 2021. Because those increases are based on the inflation rate from the prior year, the current GST credit does not reflect the unusually high inflation that Canadians are experiencing now. Depending on where they live, it is somewhere between 7% and 9%. That is why this money urgently needs to get into the pockets of these needy Canadians as soon as possible, and the NDP will work hard to do that.

I want to pause for a moment to speak a bit about why we are where we are, because there are different views on that in the House. Why are we experiencing inflation of 8% or 9%? New Democrats believe that this is inflation driven by prices, and of course the data and empirical evidence support that. This is not driven by wages. Wages have not gone up 8%. This is not driven by anything other than prices at the gas pump, in grocery stores and in insurance bills issued by companies in this country.

The other thing is that the Conservatives like to pretend that the inflation was caused by the deficit. That may play some role, but everybody who has been paying attention knows that when prices started to rise in this country, it started with the beginning of the COVID pandemic in 2020, when supply chains began to be interrupted around the world. Then we had the Ukraine-Russia war, which of course interfered with all sorts of supply chains and energy resources, and now corporations are clearly using the cover of this to drastically increase their profits and prices, taking advantage of the current situation. Whether it is the so-called FIRE industry, the finance, insurance and real estate industry, the oil and gas sector or major grocery stores, the data from economists is clear. Their profits, not their revenue, but their profits, are at dramatically higher levels.

In the case of the FIRE industry, it is up 24%. Nobody earning wages has received 24% more income. What would justify a 24% price increase? Oil and gas companies in this country are reporting record profits. They have never made more money. Then there are the financial institutions and grocery stores. Every Canadian who walks into a grocery store can see what is happening with prices.

The answer here is not to blame workers; it is not to attack politically. The approach here is to attack the source of the problem, and that means making corporations pay for their excess profits so that the money can to go to the government and it can use that money productively for Canadians, for things like dental care and other programs that will make such a huge difference to Canadians' lives.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:10 p.m.

Conservative

Jeremy Patzer Conservative Cypress Hills—Grasslands, SK

Mr. Speaker, as somebody who used to receive GST cheques, I understand how important it is to get that relief back. It is money that people paid and should get back, especially when they are below a certain income threshold.

It is a one-time payment, though. While getting people's money back into their hands is always a good principle, I wonder if the NDP would support increasing the GST payments in the longer term, so that rather than making a one-time payment, it would increase the amount of the GST rebates that people are receiving.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:10 p.m.

NDP

Don Davies NDP Vancouver Kingsway, BC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my hon. colleague, not only for sharing his experience but also for that thoughtful question.

When the GST was first proposed in this country, by Conservatives and Liberals, the New Democrats opposed it, because it is a regressive tax. By definition, the 7% tax, as it was at the time, applied to everybody. When a young single mother making $20,000 a year pays the same tax in a store as a billionaire walking into the same store and buying the same object, it is clearly regressive, so bringing in a tax credit was an attempt to try to inject some progressivity back into the tax.

In theory, the suggestion by my hon. colleague is a good one. We should be injecting progressivity into our tax system, so that the amount of money being paid in tax goes up commensurate with the amount of income being made.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:10 p.m.

Liberal

Ken Hardie Liberal Fleetwood—Port Kells, BC

Mr. Speaker, I appreciated the hon. member's comments, particularly on the notion of regressive taxation, whereby a tax applied to somebody earning $20,000 a year is a bigger hit than the same tax applied to somebody who is earning $200,000 a year.

However, I want to ask the hon. member to reverse that and talk about tax cuts that would affect individuals. If we follow the Conservative line and cut tax, which they have tried to do in the past, and we look at the relative income and the relative impact on people, who would benefit the most on a personal income tax basis from across-the-board tax cuts?

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:10 p.m.

NDP

Don Davies NDP Vancouver Kingsway, BC

Mr. Speaker, one of the benefits of being in the House for a period of time is that I have gotten to see different approaches to government.

I remember the Conservatives, when they were in power, being addicted to boutique tax cuts, which were essentially vote buying. They would appeal to a certain group of people and give them a tax cut to try to win their support. In my opinion, that is not the basis for sound tax policy.

The basis for sound taxes in any modern democracy should be based on a progressive system. I noticed that the Conservatives are talking a lot about the current economic system. They never talk about the massive profits made by large corporations. They never talk about the $30 billion that was left on the table last year in uncollected taxes from profitable corporations. What they do talk about is tax cuts, which benefit the rich and the wealthy. That is not an approach that could sustain a country like Canada, and it is unfair.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:10 p.m.

Bloc

Kristina Michaud Bloc Avignon—La Mitis—Matane—Matapédia, QC

Mr. Speaker, I know that the Parliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons stated that this bill and two others have measures to help people face inflation. That is fine. However, there may be other solutions available.

One of the solutions put forward by the Bloc Québécois was to enlist experienced workers. We know that some people who retire may be reluctant to return to the labour market to help out because the little income they would earn per year would be taxed. The Bloc proposed creating a tax credit for these people so this additional income would not be taxed. In addition to helping them cope with inflation, it could help alleviate the labour shortage.

Does my colleague agree with this proposal?

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:10 p.m.

NDP

Don Davies NDP Vancouver Kingsway, BC

Mr. Speaker, I would like to thank my hon. colleague for that creative solution. She is absolutely right that Canada is facing a labour shortage that is really unprecedented. As health critic I see this most acutely in the health care sector, where across this country, in every profession, we have a shortage of workers and they are facing a crisis.

Any measures and policies that are fair, that are targeted at getting people back in the workforce, and that encourage people to work are something we should be looking at. Any policy that discourages someone from entering the workforce is something that is unacceptable and should be changed.

I am happy to look at any proposal that the Bloc has in this regard.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:15 p.m.

Conservative

Gerald Soroka Conservative Yellowhead, AB

Mr. Speaker, before speaking to Bill C-30, I want to look at what got us here today. When we look back at the history of the current government, which started in 2015, we see that there has not yet been a single budget that it has put forward that has been balanced. Every year, the government keeps borrowing more and more money. That is not to mention the carbon tax, which I will talk about later as well, and how much that is increasing the cost of everything that we produce.

I would like to tell a little story. Many times, when I am going to the airport, the cab driver will ask what I am going to the airport for. I will say I am going home, and they ask what I am doing here in Ottawa, so I say I am an MP. He puts a big smile on his face and he asks if I am a Liberal. I say no, that I am from Alberta, so I am a Conservative. He says, “Oh, the party that cuts and slashes.” I tell him that is one way of looking at it, but the way to really look at it is that we live within our means. I see a look on his face as though he is wondering what that is supposed to mean.

I explain it to him. Every year, if a person is driving a cab and makes $50,000 a year, for instance, but spends $80,000, how long are they going to survive financially, with borrowing or spending over $30,000? He says, “Well, not very long.” I say that is actually what the government is doing, year after year after year. I can see this look on his face that says, “This is actually going to have an impact on me.” Unfortunately, though, he makes another little smirk to say that it is okay, and that because government finances do not work the same as personal finances, it is okay for the government to borrow because it is not going to have an effect on us. Canadians now are realizing the effect of this borrowing year after year after year.

I know the government will talk about how, during COVID, it had to borrow so much money to do this. However, out of all the billions that the government borrowed, half of that actually went to COVID measures, and the other half went to various programs that the government had initiated. Therefore, there is quite a disconnect in the information that the Liberals talk about.

The next thing is that with the inflation rate that we have, it is hard to believe that the Liberals say wonderful catchphrases such as that inflation is a global phenomenon. That is like saying, “Where did this come from? We have no idea. It is just shocking.” I can understand that, when we have a Prime Minister who says he does not think about the financial program here, that he does not even think about monetary policy. That is what we get from a Prime Minister who is trying to run a country, so it is no surprise that our inflation rate is growing year after year after year.

Now, Canadians are looking for a reprieve. What is there to offer? It is double the GST back. Yes, it is a one-time payment that is going to help families, but really the cost of everything is escalating. It is unbelievable how families are not able to survive at this rate.

It is not only families. I think about the seniors I have spoken about. So many of them come to me and say, “What can we do? We had money in the bank. We had money in investments and they are just continually dropping. How can we survive?” They tell me that they planned into their eighties and nineties with no problems, but have lost hundreds of thousands of dollars in the last while because of the inflationary prices that are going on to this day.

It is devastating what we are doing to Canadians here, and it is shameful what the Liberals have done to this country. That is what I am here to talk about the most: how they are not here to help Canadians. They love catchphrases. There is day care for $10 a day. It is great for young families; it is doing nothing for seniors, though. That is one of the things I really need to talk about.

I would like to thank the House for giving me this opportunity to speak to Bill C-30.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

It being 6:20, pursuant to order made on Monday, October 3, it is my duty to interrupt the proceedings and put forthwith every question necessary to dispose of the third reading stage of the bill now before the House.

The question is on the motion.

If a member of a recognized party present in the House wishes to request a recorded division or that the motion be adopted on division, I would invite them to rise and indicate it to the Chair.

The hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:20 p.m.

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux Liberal Winnipeg North, MB

Mr. Speaker, I would request a recorded vote.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 5th, 2022 / 6:20 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

Pursuant to order made on Monday, October 3, the division stands deferred until Thursday, October 6, at the expiry of the time provided for Oral Questions.

The House resumed from October 5 consideration of the motion that Bill C-30, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (temporary enhancement to the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax credit), be read the third time and passed.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 6th, 2022 / 3:10 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

It being 3:12 p.m., pursuant to order made on Monday, October 3, the House will now proceed to the taking of the deferred recorded division on the motion at third reading stage of Bill C-30.

Call in the members.

(The House divided on the motion, which was agreed to on the following division:)

Vote #188

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 6th, 2022 / 3:25 p.m.

The Speaker Anthony Rota

I declare this motion carried.

(Bill read the third time and passed)