Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1 (Targeted Tax Relief)

An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (temporary enhancement to the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax credit)

Sponsor

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is, or will soon become, law.

Summary

This is from the published bill.

This enactment amends the Income Tax Act in order to double the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax (GST/HST) credit for six months, effectively increasing the maximum annual GST/HST credit amounts by 50% for the 2022-2023 benefit year.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-30s:

C-30 (2021) Law Budget Implementation Act, 2021, No. 1
C-30 (2016) Law Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement Implementation Act
C-30 (2014) Law Fair Rail for Grain Farmers Act
C-30 (2012) Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act

Votes

Oct. 6, 2022 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-30, An Act to amend the Income Tax Act (temporary enhancement to the Goods and Services Tax/Harmonized Sales Tax credit)

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

Bill C-30 proposes amending the Income Tax Act to temporarily double the Goods and Services Tax (GST) credit for six months, aiming to provide financial relief to low-income individuals and families. The increased credit would be delivered as a lump-sum payment through the existing GST system. Concerns have been raised regarding its limited scope and effectiveness in addressing the broader structural issues contributing to the rising cost of living, including inflation, housing affordability, and supply chain challenges.

Liberal

  • Supports GST credit increase: The Liberal party supports Bill C-30, which would double the GST credit for six months to provide targeted support to Canadians struggling with the rising cost of living. This measure aims to provide additional disposable income to help Canadians deal with inflation.
  • Investing in middle class: The party emphasizes its commitment to supporting Canada's middle class and those aspiring to join it, viewing a healthy middle class as essential for a healthy economy. They believe in providing necessary supports to build a stronger middle class and improve the quality of life for Canadians.
  • Criticizes Conservative economic policies: The Liberal party criticizes the Conservative Party's economic policies, particularly their stance on the carbon tax and CPP contributions, accusing them of flip-flopping and prioritizing tax cuts for the wealthy over support for vulnerable Canadians. They contrast their targeted support measures with what they see as the Conservatives' detrimental approach.
  • Supports dental care benefit: Liberals support the Canada Dental Benefit, emphasizing the importance of providing dental care to vulnerable children. They express concern over the NDP's proposal for a fully federally administered program, suggesting that provinces and territories are better suited for delivery.

Conservative

  • Supports immediate relief: The Conservatives support the GST rebate as a form of immediate relief for Canadians struggling with the rising cost of living, but they also believe the government is not addressing the underlying structural issues of the Canadian economy.
  • Criticizes government spending: The Conservatives argue that the government's overspending and inflationary policies have led to the current affordability crisis. They criticize the government's approach of borrowing money to provide relief, stating that it will only exacerbate inflation.
  • Proposes alternative solutions: The Conservatives propose alternative solutions such as eliminating the ArriveCAN app and scrapping the Infrastructure Bank to find cost savings and reduce the burden on taxpayers. They also suggest cancelling planned tax hikes and providing tax relief to stimulate the economy.
  • Highlights affordability struggles: Conservative speakers emphasize the struggles of Canadians to afford basic necessities like groceries, gas, and home heating. They share stories of constituents who are cutting back on food, unable to enroll children in activities, and worried about the rising cost of living.

NDP

  • Supports immediate financial relief: The NDP supports Bill C-30 and Bill C-31 as immediate investments in the well-being of people. They are using their power to get the government to send financial support out to people. They view these bills as something that would never have come from the government without the pressure from New Democrats.
  • Need for systemic change: NDP speakers noted that consecutive Liberal and Conservative governments have eroded the social safety net by putting corporations above everyday people. While the NDP is acting on the immediate need, longer term change is needed. Canada needs a fair taxation system that would close corporate loopholes in order to recover the reported $30 billion lost due to corporate tax avoidance.
  • GST rebate welcomed, but insufficient: The NDP has been calling on the government to double the GST credit for over six months. They welcome this move, but state that it is insufficient, and that this rebate should have come a lot sooner. The NDP will always put people first, but the Liberal government needs to start making real investments in people and their well-being in Canada.
  • Corporate greed is the problem: While fossil fuel companies and big corporate grocery chains are bringing in billions of dollars in profits, people are falling further and further behind. Speakers accuse corporations of using inflation as cover to drastically increase their profits and prices, and taking advantage of the current situation. The NDP believes corporations need to pay for their excess profits so that the money can to go to the government and it can use that money productively for Canadians.

Bloc

  • Support for Bill C-30: The Bloc Québécois supports Bill C-30, as it aligns with their earlier budget expectations. They see it as a small but necessary measure to address the current inflationary crisis and provide financial relief to those who need it most.
  • Need for comprehensive solutions: While supporting the bill, the Bloc emphasizes that a one-time GST-HST cheque is not a comprehensive solution to the broader problem of inflation and rising poverty. They advocate for a more strategic and sustainable approach that includes long-term measures to address the root causes of economic instability.
  • Targeted and intelligent measures: The Bloc calls for government intervention and support that is properly targeted, well thought out, and intelligent to avoid negative effects and waste. They suggest using government surpluses to rebuild the economy, insulate it from future crises, and invest in sectors facing challenges like labor shortages.
  • Focus on vulnerable populations: The Bloc Québécois expresses particular concern for seniors and low-income earners, who are disproportionately affected by inflation due to their fixed incomes. They advocate for measures to help seniors meet their basic needs and enable experienced workers to remain in the workforce.

Green

  • Supports the bill: The speaker supports Bill C-30 because Canadians need help, and the GST rebate will reach 11 million Canadians. The speaker also notes support for Bill C-31, which includes a one-time payment to low-income renters and the beginning of dental care coverage.
  • Bill is a band-aid: While supporting the bill, the speaker characterizes it as a "band-aid" solution that does not address larger economic problems or the potential for a recession. The speaker notes that a band-aid is good when one is bleeding, by the way, but it is not a long-term solution.
  • Global problems: The speaker believes both Conservatives and Liberals oversimplify the problems of inflation and cost increases, and that these problems are global in nature. They also highlight the impact of climate change and international crises like the war in Ukraine on the Canadian economy.
  • Need long-term solutions: The speaker believes that instead of short-term fixes, long-term solutions are needed, such as a wealth tax or a windfall tax on oil and gas profits, anticipating a potential recession.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, you are always going to get a lot of noise from that side when I am speaking, regardless of what I say. I will leave it to you and to chair occupants to rule, because you do a very good job of that. I have a lot of respect for you, but I do not think it is unprecedented that we describe the actions of people in this room based on terms like that. As a matter of fact, probably the one who is the most egregious—

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

The member for Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo is rising on a point of order.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Mr. Speaker, now the member for Kingston and the Islands is justifying what he is doing. That is not relevant to the bill at hand. He should be sticking to what is relevant.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

We have relevancy called. We are running out of time. We want to get at least one more person in here.

The hon. parliamentary secretary.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, as I was saying, nobody is more egregious with regard to calling people names based on actions that they do than the leader of the official opposition during his 22 years or however long he has been in the House.

Nonetheless, the reality is that what we discovered in the House today, thanks to the member for Simcoe North, is that the Conservatives are actively encouraging Canadians to hedge against the Canadian dollar by investing in cryptocurrency.

I do not think this is responsible for any member of Parliament to do, let alone the leader of the official opposition in the House.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

Ottawa Centre Ontario

Liberal

Yasir Naqvi LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the President of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada and Minister of Emergency Preparedness

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the member for Kingston and the Islands for his timely comments about the need for this legislation and how it is going to help hard-working Canadians who are suffering as a result of inflation.

I have also heard from a lot of people who took the advice of the Leader of the Opposition on cryptocurrency because somehow they thought it was a legitimate way of investing their money. They have, unfortunately, lost a lot of money.

Can the member for Kingston and the Islands tell us why that advice was so dangerous and how it has impacted the lives of so many Canadians?

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, I would note, for starters, that this is the second time in a row that I have given a speech and both this time and the last time I spoke, no Conservative got up to ask me a question. As we know, the first opportunity to ask a question goes to the Conservatives. I just want them to know that I certainly take that as a compliment.

To the question that the member asked me about those who may have taken the advice, the Leader of the Opposition is seemingly unaware of the fact that his words have consequences. When he says something in the position that he is in or in the position that he was seeking to be in at the time, people will listen.

Those who did listen to him and chose to invest in cryptocurrency at the time will have seen their life savings absolutely diminish, and he does not recognize that his words can transpire into those actual actions, but it does happen.

For those who did take his advice and invest, I feel sorry that they were put in that position, and I deeply regret that the Leader of the Opposition, who was at the time the candidate seeking to be the leader, made those comments.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:40 p.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Mr. Speaker, it is always a pleasure to rise on behalf of the people of Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo.

My colleague made a point about leadership and people listening to leaders. A motion was put forward in this very House yesterday, on which we should all have shown leadership, with respect to declaring an organization as a criminal or terrorist organization. That was shot down and given a nay by the Liberals, so it is a bit rich for them to talk about leading by example when that just happened yesterday.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:45 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, I am so glad the member asked me that question because it gives me an opportunity to once again talk about the games the members on that side of the House play. They brought forward a motion with three parts to it. This is what the Conservatives do. They insert a poison pill into it, knowing that we cannot vote in favour of it. In this case, the second clause was to chastise the government over an issue. They did this just so this member could get up later on and ask the exact question he did.

The Conservatives know exactly what they are up to. They know the games they play in this House. If the member actually cared, like he says he does, the Conservatives would have brought forward a straightforward motion that did not include a poison pill, and he probably would have seen a lot—

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:45 p.m.

The Deputy Speaker Chris d'Entremont

I believe we have a point of order from the hon. member for Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:45 p.m.

Conservative

Frank Caputo Conservative Kamloops—Thompson—Cariboo, BC

Mr. Speaker, if we are going to be in this place, we must use parliamentary language. Imputing thoughts of not caring on another member is completely unparliamentary.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:45 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, the truth certainly hurts. We can see the number of times the Conservatives get up to try to interrupt me when I am speaking. What they do not understand, and it has been going on for three years now, is the more they do it, the more it encourages me, so they really have to reassess their position on this.

With respect to the member's point, had the Conservatives brought forward a simple motion that addressed exactly what he just said, I am sure it would have gone over much better on this side of the House than the way they introduced it, and he knows that.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:45 p.m.

NDP

Bonita Zarrillo NDP Port Moody—Coquitlam, BC

Mr. Speaker, hopefully we can bring the debate back to Bill C-30 and the income support gaps that are hurting people right now in Canada.

These are short-term emergency income support gap measures that the New Democrats support. We know people need help with rent and food. I want to ask the member specifically about the long-term measures that need to be taken, because more Canadians are falling into poverty and homelessness. I speak specifically about persons with disabilities right now. Is this House going to see Bill C-22 come back this week?

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:45 p.m.

Liberal

Mark Gerretsen Liberal Kingston and the Islands, ON

Mr. Speaker, over the last few decades the disparity between the haves and the have-nots has certainly been growing, and it is incumbent upon us to find ways to try to reduce that. That is why we increased taxes on the richest 1% when we were first elected and reduced taxes for the middle class. That is why we brought in $10-a-day child care. That is why we continue to strengthen the various social programs we have.

With respect to the member's question, I would like nothing more than to see that bill, which is intended for the disabled communities in Canada, move expeditiously through this House, go to committee and come back here so that we can implement it and bring it into law. I hope and have faith that all members in this House can put partisanship aside for one issue like this.

Cost of Living Relief Act, No. 1Government Orders

October 4th, 2022 / 1:45 p.m.

Some hon. members

Oh, oh!