Build Canada Homes Act

An Act respecting the establishment of Build Canada Homes

Sponsor

Gregor Robertson  Liberal

Status

This bill has received Royal Assent and is, or will soon become, law.

Summary

This is from the published bill. The Library of Parliament has also written a full legislative summary of the bill.

This enactment establishes Build Canada Homes as a Crown corporation. The purpose of Build Canada Homes is to promote, support and develop the supply of affordable housing in Canada and to promote innovative and efficient building techniques in the housing construction sector in Canada. The enactment, among other things,
(a) sets out the powers of Build Canada Homes and its governance framework;
(b) authorizes the Minister of Finance to make payments out of the Consolidated Revenue Fund to fund the operations and activities of Build Canada Homes; and
(c) provides that the Governor in Council may transfer to Build Canada Homes the property, rights, interests and obligations held by any Crown corporation or subsidiary of a Crown corporation and may issue directives for measures to be taken in relation to the reorganization of Canada Lands Company Limited or any of its subsidiaries.
It also includes transitional provisions, makes a consequential amendment to the Financial Administration Act and contains coordinating amendments.

Elsewhere

All sorts of information on this bill is available at LEGISinfo, an excellent resource from Parliament. You can also read the full text of the bill.

Bill numbers are reused for different bills each new session. Perhaps you were looking for one of these other C-20s:

C-20 (2022) Law Public Complaints and Review Commission Act
C-20 (2021) An Act to amend the Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador Additional Fiscal Equalization Offset Payments Act
C-20 (2020) Law An Act respecting further COVID-19 measures
C-20 (2016) Law Appropriation Act No. 3, 2016-17

Votes

June 10, 2026 Passed 3rd reading and adoption of Bill C-20, An Act respecting the establishment of Build Canada Homes
June 9, 2026 Passed Time allocation for Bill C-20, An Act respecting the establishment of Build Canada Homes

Debate Summary

line drawing of robot

This is a computer-generated summary of the speeches below. Usually it’s accurate, but every now and then it’ll contain inaccuracies or total fabrications.

This bill establishes "Build Canada Homes" as a new federal Crown corporation tasked with consolidating housing initiatives, leveraging federal lands, and partnering with stakeholders to accelerate affordable housing construction. Debate focuses on whether the measure will improve administrative effectiveness or merely create unnecessary government bureaucracy.

Liberal

  • Establishing Build Canada Homes: The party supports establishing Build Canada Homes as a Crown corporation to provide the operational autonomy, financial tools, and flexibility needed to address the housing crisis at scale.
  • Fostering multi-sector partnerships: This legislation centralizes federal housing initiatives, allowing the agency to act as a developer and financier while streamlining collaboration between government levels, private developers, and non-profit stakeholders.
  • Prioritizing Canadian industry: The bill integrates the "buy Canadian" strategy by prioritizing domestic materials like lumber and steel, while supporting the skilled trades to ensure that housing investments also strengthen the national economy.
  • Addressing diverse community needs: Speakers highlight that the agency addresses unique regional challenges by tailoring affordability to local incomes and supporting specific projects for rural centers, seniors, and indigenous communities.

Conservative

  • Oppose redundant housing bureaucracy: Conservatives oppose Bill C-20, arguing it creates a redundant fourth federal housing bureaucracy that adds administrative layers and executive costs without providing clear targets, timelines, or performance indicators for home construction.
  • Minimal impact on housing supply: Members highlight Parliamentary Budget Officer findings that the new Crown corporation would only contribute 5,000 homes annually, representing just 1% of the government's promised targets and failing to address the true scale of the crisis.
  • Critique of rebranding existing projects: The party criticizes the government for using the legislation to rebrand existing Canada Lands Company projects, asserting that substantive progress is stalled by regulatory delays, permitting bottlenecks, and a focus on promotional aesthetics over actual construction.
  • Proposed alternative housing solutions: The Conservatives advocate for cutting the GST on new homes under $1.3 million, tying federal infrastructure funding to municipal building targets, and removing capital gains taxes on reinvestments in new housing construction.

NDP

  • Criticizes private sector reliance: The NDP argues the bill over-relies on private developers and market incentives, claiming that billions in funding should instead support public community housing to ensure true affordability for Canadians.
  • Demands accountability and targets: Jenny Kwan highlights the lack of measurable targets and performance benchmarks, criticizing the government for rejecting an amendment that would define affordability as 30% or less of a person's income.
  • Favors non-market housing: The party advocates for large-scale investment in public and co-op housing, calling for policies to end the financialization of housing and protect renters from renovictions and market-driven price hikes.
  • Focuses on accessibility: The NDP stresses that increasing housing supply must specifically address the needs of vulnerable groups, including people with disabilities, rather than assuming that generic market units will solve the accessibility crisis.

Bloc

  • Conditional support for the bill: The party supports the bill due to the severe housing crisis and a specific agreement with Quebec that respects its legislative framework and jurisdictional priorities.
  • Concerns regarding jurisdictional encroachment: Members express concern that a new federal structure may encroach on Quebec’s jurisdiction over housing, arguing instead for direct funding transfers without federal interference or conditions.
  • Criticism of administrative inefficiency: The Bloc questions the need for a new entity alongside the CMHC, arguing that replacing functioning programs with new structures has delayed the construction of essential housing.
  • Promotion of the forestry sector: The party advocates for the prioritization of Canadian wood in construction projects to support the forestry sector, which faces significant challenges from international tariffs and a lack of support.

Green

  • Administrative focus over action: The bill merely transitions a special operating agency into a Crown corporation without establishing concrete targets or timelines to solve the housing crisis, rendering it largely ineffective in its current form.
  • Redundancy of new corporation: The party questions the necessity of creating a new entity, arguing that the government should instead properly fund and utilize the existing Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) to deliver housing.
  • Lack of clear accountability: Concerns remain regarding the absence of a designated minister responsible for the project, which risks creating an opaque governance structure without direct accountability for housing outcomes.
  • Failure to treat emergency: Stressing that the housing crisis is a national emergency, the party calls for greater political will and immediate action to house vulnerable citizens instead of focusing on legislative reorganization.
Was this summary helpful and accurate?

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:05 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Madam Speaker, there is a great need for a full range of housing, and that includes supportive housing. The truth of the matter is that building housing in and of itself is insufficient. We have to have the supports in place as well for a certain segment of the community, for example, those who are faced with multiple health issues, including addictions issues, mental health issues and so on. Supportive housing is what helps ensure people are successful in that housing, and that is what we need as well. We do not have enough supports from the federal government in that regard.

By the way, the spring economic update did not renew mental health support funding, and that is going to create greater problems for communities like Nanaimo and mine, and across the country.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:05 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Speaker, I confess that I have been struggling as to whether I vote for or against the bill.

Of course, building homes for Canadians is a great goal. I would vote for that. I kept trying to figure out why it is that I am having trouble figuring out whether I would vote for it or against it. I guess it is because, when I really study the bill and think it through, it does absolutely nothing, even if fully implemented. That is troubling.

I am just going to get to the bare bones. To Canadians who may be watching, what does Bill C-20 do? It is called an act respecting the establishment of Build Canada Homes. That is a familiar-sounding announcement because it was made on September 14, 2025, when the government created Build Canada Homes as a special operating agency.

That is something it has done a couple of times since the new government came in. Special operating agencies operate under the Treasury Board in an opaque environment where nothing is particularly visible or transparent or included in legislation. We already created Build Canada Homes on September 14 of last year. We are creating Build Canada Homes but not as a special operating agency. The bill deals with that. It would now be a Crown corporation. The bill would set up a Crown corporation. That is what it would do. It does not talk about the housing crisis. It does not give tools to address the housing crisis. It sets no targets. It has no timelines. It does not talk about the housing crisis. The purpose is:

...to promote, support and develop the supply of affordable housing in Canada and to promote innovative and efficient building techniques in the housing construction sector in Canada.

The rest of the bill is devoted to how many people are on the board of directors, what it can borrow and what it can lend. My favourite part of the bill, which, again, is a bill about setting up a corporation, is that this new corporation, Build Canada Homes, can actually take money from the federal government and give it to the federal government. It is lacking, shall we say, in ambition.

The bill misses the point. If it is going to take us through the process of passing legislation in this place, it ought to have accountability. As the member for Vancouver East just pointed out, there is no minister of housing named in the bill as responsible. The minister shall be appointed by someone in the Privy Council at any given time, who will say, of the people around the cabinet table, this week it will be Joe. That is the kind of accountability we have here. That worries me.

We also have the fundamental reality that since the end of the Second World War, since 1945, we have had the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, CMHC. Was there something wrong with CMHC? It has been massively cut. It is not being scrapped. We will still have CMHC. The Minister of Housing is responsible for CMHC. That is an entity we understand. Are there endless delays? Are there things that should be done better at CMHC? Yes, but for a government that wants to, as we always hear from the Prime Minister, move fast, why not use, fit for purpose, the institution we have already? It has in it fewer people who know what they are doing, but it still has a goal and a principle and a practice that understands that housing is a human right.

We have two kinds of housing crises in Canada right now. I want to make sure that this is explicit in the rest of my remarks. We have a crisis of affordability in market housing. People earning good incomes cannot afford a good home. A lot of that is due to industry speculation, things like real estate investment trusts, corporations owning housing and making money out of speculation. That hurts, and so does the supply of housing not being adequate to our population.

The first housing crisis, I will underscore, is a market housing supply problem for affordable housing in rental and ownership. The second housing crisis we have is acute, cruel, grinding homelessness and it is on the rise. What do we do about that?

I want to share an inspiring example. I was so honoured to tour a little place called 12 Neighbours outside Fredericton. It was a few years ago now. I met Marcel LeBrun of Fredericton, a young man. He would maybe not think he is so young now. He is a multi-millionaire because of his own entrepreneurial instincts and because he got involved in an Internet company he built up and then sold. At a sermon in a Baptist church one day, he was called upon to do more.

He made a big donation to a local homelessness group. Then he thought that was not quite enough and the homelessness problem was growing in Fredericton. Long story short, this is what Marcel LeBrun decided to do. He realized that one of the critical obstacles for building affordable homes and social, non-market housing was the cost of land, so he bought a bunch of land. Then he said, “I'm going to build 99 tiny homes on this land, 240-square-foot homes. This will give a person dignity, a home of their own. They can lock the door. It will be their home.”

He applied to CMHC for funding. He was prepared to pay one-third of the cost of this project out of his own pocket. He was putting $12 million of his own money into it. CMHC told him it would take about two weeks to process. He built 35 homes before he heard from CMHC that his project was approved, because it took CMHC about a year and a half. He got it done. Not only did he get it done, but then he saw that these problems were acute. We cannot take someone who has been homeless, living in a tent or in an encampment in the woods, put them in their own home, and magically everything is good for them, because they lack community and they lack social skills. They are still wondering how they are going to make a living.

He created a whole network of social enterprise around the housing development he built himself, for the people in his community, things like a local restaurant that people could come to, where the people who lived in his tiny homes could learn how to work in that restaurant. There is a trade shop, so people can learn how to use a Skilsaw. What Marcel LeBrun has done goes on and on. With supports for mental health and addiction, he did not just build homes. He built a community with love, care and compassion. That can be done in every community if we mandate CMHC to see if it can follow the model of what Marcel LeBrun did on his own to create sustainable long-term housing with strong mental health supports and built-in dignity and community. That is what we should be building.

This Build Canada Homes bill is not about building homes. I am not being mean about it. If colleagues read it, they will see that the Build Canada Homes act is about setting up a Crown corporation, full stop. Build Canada Homes, Bill C-20, is about replacing a special operating agency set up last year with a Crown corporation this year. There are no goals, no timelines, no accountability, no listening to the briefs that the government got from the Assembly of First Nations about engaging indigenous people and no listening to the brief that it got from the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, where the rubber really hits the road at the municipal housing level. That is where people have to figure out what we are going to do.

The government is not listening to the co-operatives in this country. The Co-operative Housing Federation of Canada gave a great brief to the committee that studied this bill. Since the bill does not include timelines or goals, I think that, if we were to actually put meaning into this bill, the clerk of the committee would have said it was outside the scope of the bill, because the scope of the bill is to set up a Crown corporation. After that, well, I wish the current Minister of Housing a great deal of luck. I hope he becomes the designated minister. Maybe he can make something out of this, but this does nothing more than set up a Crown corporation.

We need to do so much more. There will be money thrown at this Crown corporation, for sure. There will be chief executive officers and board members and it will function as a Crown corporation, but will it do more than what Marcel LeBrun did for the people of Fredericton?

The first social housing ever built in this country was in the early part of the 1900s, after the Halifax explosion, when that devastating collision in Halifax Harbour wiped out homes for thousands of people and the government had to build housing for people. The government did it, and did it fast. Nobody froze that winter. Everybody was gotten into housing fast.

We need to act like this is an emergency, because it is an emergency. Women my age in my riding are living in their cars. This is driving me to distraction. Why can we not find the housing, build the housing? There are so many delays. They are unintentional in many cases, but they show a lack of political will, which has to come from the top down. Yes, there are multiple levels of government involved, but the federal government, in Build Canada Homes, should set the standard and set some goals.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:15 p.m.

Winnipeg North Manitoba

Liberal

Kevin Lamoureux LiberalParliamentary Secretary to the Leader of the Government in the House of Commons

Madam Speaker. I understand the member has not decided how she is going to be voting on the bill. I think it is important to recognize, as she has, the purpose of the bill. The bill is there, in a way, to clearly demonstrate that working collaboratively with provinces, indigenous peoples, territories and the many other stakeholders is the best way for us to address the multitude of issues facing Canada's housing situation.

The federal government is stepping up. Here we are talking about legislation, but we have also made serious dollar commitments through the budget to support Build Canada Homes. I think we have to take a holistic approach to dealing with it.

Could the member provide her thoughts in regard to how important it is to work collaboratively with others? This, at least, helps set that stage.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:15 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Speaker, I know I cannot ask the member a question in response, but if he could show me the sections of the bill that talk about partnership, collaboration, working together and the things he just posed to me in the question, I would be fascinated to know where they are, because it is not that long a bill and they are not in here.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:15 p.m.

Conservative

Ziad Aboultaif Conservative Edmonton Manning, AB

Madam Speaker, I agree that this bill is not going to do anything. What is scary in this whole process is this: Is the government losing direction? Is it losing focus? The focus has to be on building more homes for Canadians to fix the problem. Is the government only interested in building bureaucracies? I would like the hon. member to comment on that.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:15 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Speaker, for my friend from Edmonton Manning, I want to be clear. The act would not do anything. I am not saying the government will not do anything. The act is kind of pointless, because the Liberals created a special operating agency. I would agree that there is a titch more transparency when we shift from an agency operating under the Treasury Board to a Crown corporation, but not much.

I would demand that the government act and respond to the housing crisis with non-market housing and market housing. The bill does not do it by itself. It does not do anything.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:20 p.m.

NDP

Jenny Kwan NDP Vancouver East, BC

Madam Speaker, in Canada we have CMHC specifically designed to deliver housing. Now the government is coming forward with an act for Build Canada Homes, another Crown corporation, to deliver housing, yet in this bill there are no accountability measures, no targets and no affordability requirements. Meanwhile, the Parliamentary Budget Officer projects that Build Canada Homes would only build around 50 to 100 units per year, a fraction of the annual 500,000 units, at least, that are required to address the housing crisis.

My question for my colleague is this: If there are no accountability measures, what is the point of creating yet another Crown corporation?

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:20 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Speaker, without intending to sound snarky or partisan, I guess the point of establishing yet another Crown corporation is to have an excuse for another set of press releases.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Kronis Conservative Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Madam Speaker, as the member pointed out in her speech, there is already the CMHC. Ottawa does not lack agencies with housing powers. On top of that, there is also the Canada Lands Company, which already has the power to develop federal land. There is Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada, which already manages federal housing funding and agreements. There is the Canada Infrastructure Bank, which already has the power to finance infrastructure that unlocks housing. The last time I checked, it was a minister's job to knit all of that together and to find co-operation, so I am as baffled as she is that there is yet another Crown corporation being created. I wonder whether or not the issue here might be the minister.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:20 p.m.

Green

Elizabeth May Green Saanich—Gulf Islands, BC

Madam Speaker, I would say to my hon. colleague from Nanaimo—Ladysmith that I cannot speculate. I have known this minister a long time, so forgive me for trespassing into my personal history. I am terribly fond of him. I do not think it is the minister. I think it is the government.

Build Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 5th, 2026 / 1:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Kronis Conservative Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Madam Speaker, when it comes to housing, bureaucrats count starts. They count units. They count dollars. They count funds, programs, agencies and promises, but in Nanaimo—Ladysmith, we count something different. We count the months our adult children have been living in the spare room because rent has eaten the down payment they were trying to save for. We count the number of graduates who cannot find a job that pays enough to cover rent. We count the number of people with no home at all as we pass them on the way to work.

Before I forget, I will be splitting my time.

On a more serious note, we count the graves of friends lost to addiction, the treatment beds that are not there, and the people who make it through detox only to be sent back to the same chaos they were trying to escape. We continue to measure the distance between the government's language and our reality. That distance is the distance between a young person with a diploma and a job and having no real path to owning a home in the community they grew up in. It is the distance between a person who is coming out of detox trying to stay clean and housing where drug use is not happening down the hall. Those are not separate crises. They are part of the same failure of government. We have lost the link between housing and hope.

Canada does not lack for housing announcements. In the last decade, we have had strategies, accelerators, funds, agencies, accords and photo ops, including some that have their own complete purpose-built backdrop. What we do not have is enough homes that people can afford. In Nanaimo—Ladysmith, we do not have enough of the right homes for people who are trying to rebuild their lives.

Now we have Bill C-20, which would create Build Canada Homes to promote, support and develop the supply of affordable housing. From the speeches, it sounds ambitious. The question is whether it will be useful once the media has packed up and gone home and the sets have been dismantled. All this bill does is create the skeleton. It creates the framework and the corporation itself.

The government is presenting Build Canada Homes as a generational housing investment, but the Parliamentary Budget Officer says it will only have a modest impact. The headline number is $13 billion, but the Parliamentary Budget Officer says the actual planned spend is $7.3 billion over five years on an accrual basis. The projected result is about 26,000 homes over five years, or roughly 5,200 homes a year across the entire country. This would increase housing completions by only 2.1% above the baseline and address just 3.7% of the estimated housing gap. Even with Build Canada Homes included, planned federal housing spending is set to fall by 56%, from $9.8 billion in 2025-26 to $4.3 billion in 2028-29. The Parliamentary Budget Officer has put the scale of the new housing gap plainly: Canada needs 3.2 million net new housing units by 2035, which means an average of 290,000 units a year for a decade.

The PBO also warned that this would still not fully solve affordability in every region, because income, interest rates, regional gaps and the kind of housing built all matter, as my colleagues have pointed out in their speeches. That last point matters the most to growing communities like mine, because we do not just need more housing; we need the right housing in the right places for the people who need it. Housing experts have made this same point over and over again. Mike Moffatt's report says, “Canada needs to build millions more homes, but not just any homes.” They have to be homes built for today's needs, and getting there is going to require bolder reforms, in our opinion, than those that have been put forward so far.

Bill C-20 would not speed up local approvals. It would not give our provinces and municipalities the infrastructure they need. It would not service land, and it would not set binding targets for how many homes will be completed by when, for whom, at what price.

What Bill C-20 would do is create another federal bureaucracy on top of at least four others in this space. There is CMHC, which already has the power to finance housing, lend, guarantee loans, invest and run federal housing programs. The Canada Lands Company already has the power to develop federal land. Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada already manages federal housing funding and agreements. The Canada Infrastructure Bank already has the power to finance infrastructure that unlocks housing.

In other words, the functions are already there, and Ottawa does not lack agencies with housing powers. What it lacks is results. Building another bureaucracy means time spent setting it up. Offices need to be set up, executives hired, mandates written, files moved around and programs reorganized, and that is time and money that could be spent getting homes built. That is the problem. The government is using language that Canadians want to hear, but the structure does not match the urgency of the moment.

Young Canadians understand this instinctively. We tell them to study, work, save and be patient. Then they graduate into a labour market where entry-level jobs are harder and harder to find, where rent consumes too much of their income and where ownership feels less like a goal than a memory from someone else's Canada.

This week, a recent software engineering graduate came to a committee of the House to say that he could still not find entry-level work in his field. When asked whether he was working, he said yes, but not as a software engineer. The Liberal MP's reply was, “At least you're employed.” That answer reveals something deeper than one exchange. It shows a government that has lowered the bar.

I will continue my speech when the House resumes next week.

The House resumed from June 5 consideration of the motion that Bill C-20, An Act respecting the establishment of Build Canada Homes, be read the third time and passed.

Third ReadingBuild Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 9th, 2026 / 12:30 p.m.

Surrey Centre B.C.

Liberal

Randeep Sarai LiberalSecretary of State (International Development)

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of Bill C-20, the Build Canada Homes act—

Third ReadingBuild Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 9th, 2026 / 12:30 p.m.

The Speaker Francis Scarpaleggia

I have to interrupt the hon. member.

In fact, the hon. member for Nanaimo—Ladysmith has three and a half minutes remaining. She is now in the House, so I will ask the secretary of state to wait until the hon. member has finished her speech.

Third ReadingBuild Canada Homes ActGovernment Orders

June 9th, 2026 / 12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Tamara Kronis Conservative Nanaimo—Ladysmith, BC

Mr. Speaker, Bill C-20 aspires to help Canadians build more homes faster and promote innovative and efficient building techniques for the housing sector. The goal matters deeply in communities like Nanaimo—Ladysmith.

As I said at the beginning of my original speech, I am splitting my time today.

Across the mid-island, families are facing the same housing pressures we see across the country.