Thank you so much, Madam Chair.
To come back—and these are just my personal thoughts—you're saying the board acted coherently and competently when it decided to settle the 2018 claim. I find that odd.
Number one, again, it was not minuted.
Number two, the whole discussion about settling a claim revolves around the legal risk of Hockey Canada. You have to understand the legal risk of Hockey Canada, your affiliates and the players in order to understand whether or not you settle a case, yet we were told by Hockey Canada at repeated hearings that they didn't know any of the individuals involved and they didn't know whether the underlying facts were true. To me, that means you would settle every single case, if the position is you settle the cases because you want to protect the plaintiff, whether you have investigated or not.
Finally, it seems that you didn't even have the actual agreement in front of you when you were authorizing it.
In any case, I find it odd. I wanted to explain to you why I was so categorical in my previous round of questions.
I want to move to another issue. You've talked about moving forward. You've talked about the oversight committee—