I don't think there are a number of models that have worked well, but at least in the fisheries—and I think most of the recovery strategies that are ongoing right now are in the fisheries—we have had some good ones come forward in Atlantic Canada, wherein we've had good cooperation between industry members and environmental NGOs, and also with Department of Fisheries and Oceans personnel, who have all come together. The essential point is that they came together and identified what they felt was a recovery target. A recovery target in that instance was simply to get the species back up to a level at which it would be deemed no longer a species at risk. Just that simple type of agreement got people to start working together and trying to figure out what would be a recovery plan to meet the target.
On the other hand, for example, we've had issues in British Columbia on which there's absolutely no meeting of minds concerning what recovery is. Is it as the previous questioner put it, to bring that species back to the highest level that's recorded in history? Unless you get over those types of humps and come to an agreement as to what a target is, then the recovery team seems to wander quite extensively.