—building codes, innovation, that sort of thing.
The last one around CEAA will be informed by their coming to the committee with their report.
I think Ed's right. Some of these you can dive into for the entire session, and while increasingly engaging you start to saw sawdust after a while if you're not careful. The committees can get so into the minutiae, and every single group wants to comment on something like climate, or CEAA, or any of these. Any of these committee studies can go, not off the rails, but so deep as to be not increasingly effective.
I don't know how you want to handle this, Chair, but I think when you get down to brass tacks, it starts to be about what the priority is for each of the committee members and where the consensus is. If there's a consensus or a near consensus, then what comes first, what comes second, third, and so forth, and then what amount of time is available to us in this session until the summer, and how much time we want to spend on each. Do you want to try to get all...what I have here is five. There may be more or less depending on how you break it up. It would be probably unlikely to do all five, I would guess, based on previous experience, because it's not that heavy a sitting schedule.
