Thank you.
Thank you to the witnesses for joining us here today. It's an interesting conversation.
I'll talk to the mayor of Princeton in terms of some of the comments that were made talking about nature-based solutions for flooding as well as possible infrastructure improvements like diking. I do agree that the solutions should be regionally based and community based, but that is not how the legislation works.
I've tried a number of times in my riding to help residential properties mitigate and remediate some damage from flooding but, to be clear, when it comes to properties in my riding especially, the priority is not residential use when it comes to diking or flooding. The priority is salmon, for example, and it's going to take a lot of time to change that. That's not mentioning Environment Canada's legislation and regulations and not mentioning provincial jurisdictions.
I do agree that this has to be all hands-on to talk about this, but it's going to have to be a really strong political and coordinated approach to convince government—any government—to say that, yes, we have to start prioritizing residential use versus, say, what's best for salmon.
Has the mayor come across any conversation in that context?