Yes, that's what we heard in some previous witness testimony also. That's great to hear.
I'm also wondering this: When you're thinking about the program, how are you factoring in the risk and the changing risk over time? At the City of Halifax, we spent more than a quarter of a million dollars just to do updated, really detailed flood mapping using bathymetric and terrestrial lidar, and the whole thing took years. We had a consultant on board for a long time just to get that data, which was a snapshot in time, and then there was the whole issue of sharing the data. What's the thinking around providing the data for people's homes across this country, the perception that it'll decrease property values and how do you manage that whole conversation?
