Very well.
I know you're a little apprehensive. I want to take this slowly with you and I want you to relax. I know that anybody who comes before a committee for the first time is wondering about the process and what's going to happen here. You were here a little while ago to hear some of the proceedings with Mr. Luc Lavoie, who has been involved in this matter for many years. He knows how things work. He was obviously very comfortable.
I want you to understand that this isn't a court. We're not trying to find anybody innocent or guilty. We are conducting a study and we're trying to find out some information and some facts, which will help us to better understand a pretty complicated situation.
Your position, working at 24 Sussex and having an occasion to see and to hear things, to meet people, to know who was there and who came around, may be helpful to us to understand the relationships that exist among a variety of people. You are one of many witnesses, and I don't expect that you're going to help us in broad ways, but I have a feeling that the kinds of things you can tell us will give us a better sense, so that we better understand as other people tell us about what's going on.
I want to affirm to you that any testimony or evidence you provide to us it is protected by parliamentary privilege. That means that none of what you say here can be used against you by anyone for any proceeding, whether it be a court proceeding or an inquiry or anything. It's here, and it's protected here, and it can't be used at all.
As I said, because you were an employee—and from all we know, you did a very good job on behalf of the Prime Minister at the time—we've asked you here to help us. And that's exactly why you're here: to express freely your opinions, your views, your observations, your speech.
Having said that, I know you will try to answer the questions to the best of your ability, and we will work together to make sure we have the time to properly explain ourselves.
Do you have any questions to ask before we start?