I heard the couple of examples that you cited. We talked about the G-20 security expenses. Frankly, the government was beaten up over it. We came forward. We said where we spent money. It came in well under $300 million, the amount budgeted, and the story went away. There had been so many rumours out there about misspending and abuse, but the Auditor General came in and looked at it and everybody agreed that it was consistent with how we spend money. We may not want to host another G-20. In my opinion, though, I think it's a responsibility if you're going to belong to the G-20. But the bottom line is, once the Auditor General looked at it and said the spending was consistent, the story went away.
You said that you believe the CBC must open its books. That's not an attack on the CBC, is it?