What we have isn't a Brookfield problem. The reason you're here is that the Prime Minister has a financial interest in the performance of this company.
What we've said—what I've said—is that to restore Canadians' flagging confidence in democratic institutions and in their elected officials, there ought to be a regime in place whereby party leaders who are represented in the House of Commons divest by way of sale of their controlled assets. Then we avoid the perception and we avoid the risk, and then there isn't a need to manage conflicts.
That's why we're here. We're looking for information, because it's very opaque, and Canadians don't understand. It should be possible to hold two views at the same time: You want an investment in nuclear technology, but you also want to be certain that the decision was made because it's best for the country and it's not going to personally benefit any elected official.