Evidence of meeting #94 for Finance in the 44th Parliament, 1st Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was chair.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Alexandre Roger
Philippe Méla  Legislative Clerk
Ariane Gagné-Frégeau  Legislative Clerk
Miriam Burke  Legislative Clerk
Jean-François Lafleur  Legislative Clerk

8:25 p.m.

Liberal

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

Yes, but the question was:

“Shall we carry clause...”, and then you have to add—

8:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

That's correct, but if we say, “Negatived on division”, that means it doesn't carry.

8:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

No.

MP Kmiec, are you accepting on division?

8:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

No. What I said was, “Negatived on division.”

8:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

You cannot do that.

8:25 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

That's done in other committees. Another House committee did it today.

8:25 p.m.

Liberal

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

The question is different. It's “shall it be carried?”, with a question mark. Then it's “with dissidence”.

May 29th, 2023 / 8:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

The answer to the question is, “No, it shall not carry: It shall be rejected on division.”

8:25 p.m.

Liberal

Sophie Chatel Liberal Pontiac, QC

Then you've changed the chair's question.

8:25 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

No, you're not changing the question. You're answering the question. “On division” means you're agreeing to proceed on the basis of a—

8:25 p.m.

An hon. member

This is a waste of time.

8:25 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

Yes.

Clerk, record the vote.

(Clause 100 agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4)

This is a good time, members, to suspend for about 15 minutes.

Thanks.

8:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

We're back. Everybody got a good stretch and some air.

Members, shall clause 101 carry?

8:45 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

I'd like a recorded vote.

(Clause 101 agreed to: yeas 7; nays 4)

8:45 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

Shall clause 102 carry?

8:50 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Kmiec Conservative Calgary Shepard, AB

I request a recorded vote, Mr. Chair.

8:50 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

I have a point of order, Mr. Chair.

8:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

MP Ste-Marie, you have a point of order.

8:50 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

Would you please confirm for me that clause 100 was carried before the break.

8:50 p.m.

Conservative

Garnett Genuis Conservative Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, AB

On a point of order, we didn't hear the point of order, because there was no translation.

8:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

MP Ste-Marie, we did not get the translation.

I did hear about the headset. MP Ste-Marie's headset was approved and is approved by the House, but we do need the translation.

MP Ste-Marie, can we try again and see if we can get translation?

8:50 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

Can you confirm for me that the interpretation is working?

8:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

Interpretation is now working, MP Ste-Marie.

8:50 p.m.

Bloc

Gabriel Ste-Marie Bloc Joliette, QC

All right.

I wanted to make sure that clause 100 had carried before the break.

8:50 p.m.

Liberal

The Chair Liberal Peter Fonseca

It had, MP Ste-Marie.