Yes, exactly.
In its New Emerging Fisheries Policy, Fisheries and Oceans Canada defines new fisheries as, “Fisheries involving new species and/or stocks that are not utilized or not fully utilized, and not currently covered by a management plan.”
I'm not a legal expert, but obviously redfish meets all of those criteria. So Fisheries and Oceans Canada did not have to respect the principle of historical shares. This is obviously a new fishery.
This is a choice that the government has made, that Fisheries and Oceans Canada and the minister have made, for reasons that, frankly, we have no idea about. In our minds, this defies all logic and practically all the criteria and policies that Fisheries and Oceans Canada has established.
It is indeed in that sense that we were talking about a new fishery. It's not just our opinion; it's actually a new fishery, so it should be treated as a new fishery. Once this fishery starts, we'll have to review, rethink and redefine the way we do things.