Mr. Vacher, you're talking to a son of a fisherman here. Certainly, my father didn't have the good years of lobster fishing, but I think everyone knows that some catches are unreported in the lobster fishery.
Unfortunately, I think that not having good data on how the lobster fishery resource is doing is a factor that must be considered. That's my opinion, and it may be different from yours. However, I think we need to have an effectively managed fishery in order to have good scientific data, both on the indigenous side and on the commercial side. Both sides are talking about managing the resource with a sustainable fishery. However, how do you want us to have a sustainable fishery for years to come, for generations to come, if we don't have any data?
I understand your point of view, but now I'll ask my other questions.
Mr. Noël, you own a crab fishing licence. In the new Fisheries Act in 2017, it says that the owner-operator must be on the vessel. That was a long-standing request from associations and fishers, precisely because they wanted to avoid questionable funding agreements with plants, and so on. It was to avoid the takeover of a company like the one you worked very hard for, you and all the others who hold licences. That still creates problems, because, as you know, licences are very expensive. We're talking about millions of dollars, whether for the lobster fishery or the crab fishery.
Do you think mechanisms should be put in place in the act, or even on the financial side, to ensure that licences are kept in our regions? We know that permits are going to other regions because of questionable regulations. Given the price of these licences, would you agree to propose solutions to the government so that a group, family members, nephews, nieces, deckhands, whatever, can hold these licences? Would you be prepared to make a proposal to further facilitate access to these licences and keep them in our communities, instead of them being bought up by companies under agreements that are sometimes questionable?