Well, actually, it's on that point, Chair, now that you mention it. If, for instance, the government doesn't want to hear from a witness--I'm not saying you would ever do that, but conceivably that could happen. I guess that's the concern.
The fact that the rules were written the way they were before was to avoid that. In effect, you're saying that if you don't want to hear from a witness, and you as the chair and the government don't want to hear from whatever group, you could easily shut it down--not that you would ever do that. It's not in any book, I'm sure, but it's something you could do, the way it's written. I know that's not what anyone is contemplating here, but by design, if you decided you didn't want it, you could have a veto on it.