Well put. I was going to state similar points.
We're not writing a report that we would typically do here. It's simply submitting a point that a privilege has been compromised and asks that there be certain facets of statement of fact from what occurred at this committee to be included in that report and then have the Speaker rule. I really don't think we need two hours, frankly, to look that over.
What I was asking for is to paraphrase what was discussed here at committee, certainly, but that we look to the facts as they were presented by the minister herself through the testimony on December 9. It's fairly straightforward. We're not making recommendations, as was mentioned. We're putting forward, as we've okayed, the motion to have the privilege noted and sent to the Speaker.
I concur. I don't think it would take two hours at all. In fact, we should give ourselves a limit of not more than 45 minutes to an hour to look that over.