So there's an attempt to do that.
I want to also note that as helpful as my friend, Mr. Obhrai, has been in telling you what we were proposing, it turns out we can do that ourselves. What I think we were saying at the briefing is clear. He's right on one count: I did suggest that we'd like to see a five-year review.
I think there is an opportunity here for compromise, and I suggest there is a way—I think we can work on this after, and I want to see what you might think of this—of doing both, and that is to focus the mind. You could have a sunset with a review. A review would happen before to decide whether or not you have a sunset.
I'm just thinking of your response to that, albeit you might be seen as an interested party, Mr. Nicholson, but that is a possibility. I'm just helping my friend, Mr. Obhrai, with the idea that it doesn't have to be either/or; it can be with that provision. I'll leave it for us to decide after.
If in fact then we have the resources of FINTRAC.... Maybe to you, Minister Nicholson, there's a concern, generally speaking, on how to track assets of people who have dubious human rights records. I'm just wondering. Many people ask me, quite rightly, if we knew these things were happening, if we knew this regime wasn't stellar, if we knew they had assets here, did we actually have an idea of how many assets were invested in Canada by, say, Gadhafi or Ben Ali, and if not, why not?