To get a better idea of the motivation for this, Bob mentioned that the government wants parliamentary secretaries to be involved in steering. I get that, if that's the case, but I might not like it.
I'm wondering if there's a way to keep it as a tight formation that we wouldn't have too big a steering committee, and I'm wondering if we could go back. There is the chair, who obviously is a government member. There are representatives from two opposition parties. We don't make binding decisions at steering committee; it's simply to map out what to bring to committee. Let's be clear about that. I believe any concern the government might have or expertise from the parliamentary secretaries certainly could be communicated by the representative. Indeed, I'm not objecting to having a parliamentary secretary. If we had the language that there be a representative from the respective parties, which I was going to recommend, maybe that would be a compromise.
My concern, frankly, is that we don't get too top-heavy in the composition in terms of numbers. What Mr. Dechert has proposed is a fairly sound argument in terms of having input, but I don't see why that requires more members. I think that could be done through regular communication, and certainly the government has full access to the resources to make sure that's done. I underline the point that we have a chair who's from the government, and that the composition of the steering committee will be well representative of the interests of government, noting that you are very objective and fair, Mr. Chair.