I have a couple of quick questions.
One is with regard to that engagement you speak of. I agree it's a balancing act, really. It's about having the smart sanctions—and I couldn't agree with you more about what we've learned and why we should apply them in the way you've suggested—but also figuring out ways that we can stay engaged.
Would you send our ambassador back to Moscow to stay engaged and to keep our voice heard directly by the government there?
You had mentioned recently that you don't want to back a bear into a corner, an apt metaphor. What did you mean by that?
Also, there's that balance I spoke of between on the one hand very clear language, absolute clarity in terms of the transgressions as not acceptable, but on the other hand, this form of engagement that we require.