If that's directed at me, I think the general suggestion is yes, we're seeing that China and Russia have invested heavily in all sorts of weapons, and not the conventional sort. We're looking at what they can do in terms of cyber-meddling and cyber-offensive action. Both are investing heavily in what we call hypersonic weapons, which then allow for missiles to skip along the atmosphere and come at us at Mach 5 or 6.
They're putting a lot of effort into capabilities, but the other side of that, of course, is intention. We're still trying to understand the intentions. That's why I might differ a bit from Dr. Perry, in that I see opportunities when it comes to conversations on the Arctic about search and rescue, the Arctic fishing moratorium. This is an avenue of diplomacy where we can talk about shared interests and perhaps have side conversations that might give us a clear indication of exactly what the intentions are.
I know right now, concern for Russia is the GIUK gap. We have certainly dropped the ball on monitoring that. However, with regard to the Canadian Arctic as the specific target, I don't think that's the concern.