I will do my best to assist.
Again, without trying to be too specific, as Marc-Yves was saying, the tool that is available to the government under the Special Economic Measures Act essentially has the two different.... We call them triggers, the two different triggers. One is the association of states, of which we're a member, and that really is quite broad. That could potentially be used in a number of different circumstances, as long as it's an association, which Canada is a part of, that has agreed that it's appropriate to impose sanctions. As I was saying, that was the case with the former Yugoslavia. That was a G7 statement or resolution that was made at the time.
The second trigger is the one that most are probably familiar with, and that is the grave breach of international peace and security. There can be situations of gross violations of human rights that might be such that they would be considered by the Governor in Council to be a grave breach of international peace and security. That was the case in Burma. It was the case with Syria, as well, and Zimbabwe was the other situation.
I guess it's very much a contextual analysis. It depends on the circumstances that the Governor in Council views as being sufficient to be considered a grave breach of international peace and security. But under that second trigger, if you meet that threshold, it could very well be a situation of gross violations of human rights that might lead you to that particular conclusion. It's contextual. It's going to depend on the situation.