Evidence of meeting #17 for Government Operations and Estimates in the 43rd Parliament, 2nd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was institutions.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Caroline Maynard  Information Commissioner of Canada, Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada
Clerk of the Committee  Mr. Paul Cardegna

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

I don't think that's required in a matter at hand motion, Mr. Clerk.

7:20 p.m.

The Clerk

It's actually not.... You can move the motion, but unfortunately, I can't distribute it because it's only in English.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

Right.

7:20 p.m.

The Clerk

I'm saying that, from my part, I can't distribute it.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

[Inaudible—Editor] confusion about whether it's a valid motion.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

Do we have unanimous consent for the clerk to distribute to everybody what he has received from Mr. McCauley in one language?

7:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

No.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

Okay, we don't have that.

Thank you.

Are there any other questions?

I see Mr. Kusmierczyk.

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Irek Kusmierczyk Liberal Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

Mr. Chair, building upon what my colleague Mr. Drouin asked, can you please rule on the appropriateness of this motion? Normally you require 48 hours' notice in advance.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

Not in a matter at hand motion.

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Irek Kusmierczyk Liberal Windsor—Tecumseh, ON

This seems.... Matter at hand.... I think there's a very tenuous link here, if at all.

I'm wondering if the chair could rule on whether this motion is appropriate. It seems like we're debating two different acts, two different issues.

7:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

In looking at it and as we move forward on it, we have had the whistle-blowers here presenting to this committee on this study. We have also heard today from the witness and, therefore, I see this as valid. Again, we will further continue debate.

Mr. Drouin, I see your hand up.

7:20 p.m.

Liberal

Francis Drouin Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON

Mr. Chair, I cannot believe that we are debating a motion when, as a parliamentarian, I do not have it in French. The House just passed a unanimous motion to ensure that the interpreters can do their job, and I know that they are doing so. But now I don't even have the text in French.

Can you repeat the motion? Can I have the text of the motion in French? I don't want to tell Mr. McCauley what to do, but he's been here for a number of years so he should know that a motion has to be moved in both official languages.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

They're in the rules—

No, Francis.

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

Francis Drouin Liberal Glengarry—Prescott—Russell, ON

Mr. Paul-Hus cannot accept that.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

No, not in a matter at hand motion that can be read in—

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

I will get the clerk to—

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

—and translated at the same time.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

Order.

I will have the clerk reread the motion, which will then be translated so that everyone can hear it in English and French.

Mr. Clerk.

7:25 p.m.

The Clerk

Thank you, Mr. Chair.

The text of the motion is this: “That, in light of testimony heard in relation to the committee's study on the government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the committee retable the committee's 2017 ninth report, titled “Strengthening the Protection of the Public Interest within the Public Servants Disclosure Protection Act”, and call on the government to immediately implement, or undertake to implement, the report's recommendations, and that the President of the Treasury Board appear to provide an update on the progress since the initial tabling of the report.”

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

Thank you, Mr. Clerk.

Next we have Mr. MacKinnon.

7:25 p.m.

Liberal

Steven MacKinnon Liberal Gatineau, QC

Mr. Chair, I am also trying to see the connection.

We are doing a study on COVID-19 for which we have called the Information Commissioner to look at the government's response to the pandemic while public servants are away from their workplaces. That was the purpose of our meeting today. Suddenly, we receive a motion that does not deal with COVID-19 or the Access to Information Act, which is the topic on the agenda of our meeting today.

Mr. Chair, I would like to ask you formally whether you believe this motion is related to the topic being discussed today and whether you believe it is in order.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

Thank you, Mr. MacKinnon. I appreciate your comments. I have ruled on this, and we did have the witnesses today talking about this very subject.

We have Mr. Drouin.

No? Are you done, Mr. Drouin?

Okay. We'll go to Mr. McCauley.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

Kelly McCauley Conservative Edmonton West, AB

I'm sorry. I've lowered my hand.

7:25 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Robert Gordon Kitchen

Mr. MacKinnon?

Okay. I see no [Technical difficulty—Editor]

We'll call for the vote on the question, Mr. Clerk.

(Motion agreed to [See Minutes of Proceedings])