Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Thank you to all for coming. My questions will be directed toward Mr. Aubie and Mr. St-Amour.
Congratulations on your election victory.
Listening to your testimony, I think there is actually quite a bit of overlap and connection with some of the challenges the Canada Post strike inflicted on rural communities as well as urban communities. There may be varying degrees of differences, but there are some similarities. In my riding of Eglinton—Lawrence, very much an urban Toronto riding, there was in-person pickup for elderly people who were sick and who couldn't get, for example, medicine delivered to their homes. So there's 100% empathy coming from me as an urban member of Parliament on some of the challenges you laid out, sir.
Balanced with this is that Canada Post has a burn rate of about $10 million a day. You've seen massive decreases in postal usage. It is difficult to see a path for high-risk revenue sources like online banking. I come from that world. It is not realistic to say that Canada Post can become a banking hub. There are costs around investments in technology and costs around staffing people who have expertise in risk management and treasury services. It is an incredibly complex business. Canada Post just isn't positioned and will not be positioned to do it. When it comes to any suggestion that Canada Post should transition to banking, we've seen examples from other jurisdictions that have failed miserably. We need to try to be realistic.
My question is open-ended. If I want our kids and grandkids to have a functioning Canada Post, what do you see as realistic changes that can be implemented? I know that this is sort of outside your scope, but what suggestions do you have for Canada Post as a corporation where we can reduce the burn rate from $10 million a day to something that is sustainable while we also try to get services delivered to your constituents and mine?