Evidence of meeting #54 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was document.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Nicolas Auclair  Committee Researcher
Andre Barnes  Committee Researcher

12:30 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

Can we have that wording?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Sure. You said something at the beginning that sounded to me as if it was exact. Go ahead and give it a shot.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

Actually, we have the date, so we could cite the date. I think it was actually March 18 or something. I gave in my copy.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

It is at the end of paragraph 30.

March 24th, 2011 / 12:30 p.m.

Andre Barnes Committee Researcher

At the very end of paragraph 30, it says: “On March 21, 2011, Ms. Biggs provided an example to the committee. The document showed that Ms. Biggs and another official had recommended a proposal...” and so on.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

In that case, let me withdraw. You've included the evidence. I thought it hadn't been included. I owe you an apology, because I was actually going to be critical and say that it should have been included. So let me apologize for something I almost said. There is no need to put this in here.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Thank you.

(Paragraphs 28 and 29 agreed to)

On paragraph 30, Mr. Young.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Chair, what the opposition coalition just voted to not accept in the committee were two documents, actually, that Mr. Reid proposed.

Is that correct, Mr. Reid?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

That's correct.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

They both showed that it was normal procedure at CIDA, between the minister and CIDA, to--

12:30 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Rae Liberal Toronto Centre, ON

We voted yes. We've agreed. We've accepted it.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

Thank you for doing that, because it's very important, colleagues.

The report should then therefore show that there were actually two documents. It indicates at the bottom of paragraph 30 that there was one document.

12:30 p.m.

Liberal

Bob Rae Liberal Toronto Centre, ON

It is the regime versus the coalition, is it?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Okay, where am I? It's 28. I'm sorry, I thought I was at 30. I'm holding my thumb where I thought I was.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Harold Albrecht Conservative Kitchener—Conestoga, ON

Mr. Chair, we jumped ahead to 30 because of the reference to 30 the analyst drew to Mr. Reid's attention.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

According to this, there is no opposition to paragraph 29.

Are all in favour of paragraph 30, as written?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

I'm proposing an amendment to 30.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

We still have more here. Go ahead.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Terence Young Conservative Oakville, ON

The last sentence says “The document showed that Ms. Biggs and another official...”. It refers to one document. In fact, there are two documents. There are two precedents. Can we make that correction?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

It's easy enough to say that there were two documents.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

For clarity, what it should say, if I may, Mr. Chair, is that “On March 21, 2011, Ms. Biggs provided two examples to the committee”--not “an example”, but “two examples”. And then, “These documents”--plural--“showed that Ms. Biggs and another official had recommended a proposal for funding and signed the documents on December 1, 2009”.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Are you okay with that?

I have Mr. Reid before you. We'll have Mr. Reid and then Mr. McGuinty.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

It's not my amendment. I'm suggesting it as an adjustment to the amendment, which I think Mr. Lukiwski will accept.

There may be a problem with the dates on the documents, because if you take a look at them, there are two documents, which are dated with two dates, if I'm not mistaken, both in March 2010.

Am I wrong? I'm doing this all from memory, because I don't have them. Can I have them back here for a second?

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Show those to Mr. Reid so he can get his dates.

12:30 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

There are two documents there. Where are the dates on these things? According to her cover letter, one is dated March 5, 2010, and the second one is dated March 8, 2010.