Evidence of meeting #54 for Procedure and House Affairs in the 40th Parliament, 3rd Session. (The original version is on Parliament’s site, as are the minutes.) The winning word was document.

A recording is available from Parliament.

On the agenda

MPs speaking

Also speaking

Nicolas Auclair  Committee Researcher
Andre Barnes  Committee Researcher

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

Yes, I think the same problem exists in English. It wasn't a supplementary report, it was a dissenting report.

I'm not sure if Mr. Lukiwski probably had the same thing I was going to talk about.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Mr. Lukiwski.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

My point is that we have to amend this because the report states that the dissenting report—this is called a “supplementary” report—is “prepared by the Conservative Party of Canada”. It was not. It was prepared by the government members on the committee, not the Conservative Party of Canada.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

The report states it as “a supplementary report prepared by the Conservative Party of Canada”, attached to the report.

So I know where they got the words. It may not be correct, but that's where the words came from.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

It's not the end of the world.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

No.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

[Inaudible—Editor]

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Scott Reid Conservative Lanark—Frontenac—Lennox and Addington, ON

I know, but that's what it says, so I'm not worried about it.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

It would be the government members sitting on the committee who prepared the report, would it not?

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Yes, it would be.

12:20 p.m.

An hon. member

It doesn't matter.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

Well, that's my understanding.

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

Whatever suits you.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

I believe it says that too.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

If it's factual, it's fine.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

So that's paragraph 11. As written, or any changes?

12:20 p.m.

Liberal

Marcel Proulx Liberal Hull—Aylmer, QC

There are a few changes in French.

12:20 p.m.

Bloc

Pierre Paquette Bloc Joliette, QC

Opinion“ has been changed.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

Okay, so we've gone to “opinion”.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Harold Albrecht Conservative Kitchener—Conestoga, ON

There's the question about “supplementary” or “dissenting”.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

It says “supplementary”, so we're going to sit there, I think.

All in favour of paragraph 11, as changed?

12:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

The Chair Conservative Joe Preston

(Paragraphs 12 to 15 inclusive agreed to)

All in favour of paragraph 16?

12:20 p.m.

Some hon. members

Agreed.

12:20 p.m.

Conservative

Tom Lukiwski Conservative Regina—Lumsden—Lake Centre, SK

Sorry, did you say paragraph 16?